5
60
P.R. Sahoo et al. / Polyhedron 171 (2019) 559–570
diverse role in dioxygen transport, energy production and signal
transduction [33]. Imbalance in copper ion uptake during life pro-
cesses can lead to Menkes and Wilson’s disease [34]. Therefore,
development of robust and versatile ligands is the prerequisite
for monitoring and efficient removal of excess Cu2 ions.
Besides copper ion, nickel ion is an important element for cellu-
lar organisms and metalloenzymes. Nickel ion containing com-
plexes having nitrogen and oxygen atoms are found in active
sites of many enzymes such as hydrogenases and carbon monoxide
dehydrogenases [35,36]. Apart from its biological role, carboxylate
based nickel complexes are often used as potential candidates as
adsorption agents, catalysts, and molecular magnets [37].
2.2.3. Synthesis of 1–Cu complex
The ligand 1 (0.5 g, 1.66 mmol) and copper acetate (0.33 g,
1.65 mmol) were dissolved separately in 10 mL acetonitrile and
mixed in a 50 mL round bottom flask. Then the solution was stirred
for 2 h. It was filtered out and the solvent was evaporated under
reduced pressure. The crude product was dissolved in a small
amount of acetonitrile, which was subjected to vapor diffusion of
diethyl ether and kept inside the refrigerator. Blue colored crystals
+
were observed after one week. Yield: 42% m.pt. 182–187 °C. IR
À1
(KBr,
m
-cm ): 3468, 2952, 1644, 1456, 1322, 1212, 1114, 792,
+
666. HRMS C35
789.6478.
2
H36Cu N
2
O
2
10ÁH O calculated 789.75 found [M] :
In the present work, we have synthesized a fluorescent ligand,
2
+
2+
its Cu
and Ni
complexes by utilizing easily available 3-
2
.2.4. Synthesis of 1–Ni complex
The ligand 1 (0.5 g, 1.66 mmol) and nickel acetate (0.41 g,
.64 mmol) were dissolved separately in 10 mL acetonitrile and
hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid and morpholine precursors. The two
steps synthetic process involves methylation of 3-hydroxy 2-naph-
thoic acid followed by Mannich condensation in benzene to yield 1.
The morpholine moiety was anchored to the hydroxy naphthoate
system in order to achieve flexible functions such as chelation
and color generation.
1
mixed in a 50 mL round bottom flask. Then the solution was stirred
for 2 h. It was filtered out and the solvent was evaporated under
reduced pressure. The crude product was dissolved in a small
amount of acetonitrile, which was subjected to vapor diffusion of
diethyl ether and kept inside the refrigerator. Green crystals were
observed after two weeks. Yield: 34% m.pt. 152–158 °C. IR (KBr,
2
. Experimental
À1
m-cm ): 3456, 3252, 2958, 1686, 1594, 1440, 1320, 1212, 1114,
8
66, 792, 684. HRMS C44
H
55
N
2
Ni
4
O
22ÁC
2
H
4
O
2
Á2(H
2
2 3
O)Á5(C H N) cal-
2.1. Material and methods
+
culated m/z: 1322.1505; found [M+H] : 1323.8843.
All reagents and solvents for synthesis purposes were pur-
chased commercially and were utilized as received. H NMR and
C NMR spectra were recorded on 400 MHz Joel NMR ECX 400
1
2.3. NMR studies
1
3
1
The H NMR spectra of the ligand 1 and its complex with copper
NMR spectrometer. Mass measurements were performed using
an Agilent 6500 Series Accurate Mass Q-TOF Spectrophotometer.
IR measurements were performed using a Bruker FT-IR Spec-
trophotometer using a KBr pellet. X-ray diffraction was carried
out on an Oxford XcaliburS diffractometer. Differential Thermal
Analysis and Thermo Gravimetric Analysis were recorded on Per-
kin Elmer, Pyris diamond TGA/DTA instrument. PXRD spectra were
recorded on Bruker, Rigaku, High-Resolution X-ray diffractometer.
UV–Vis spectra were recorded on Ocean Optics USB 4000 UV–Vis
Spectrometer. Fluorescence measurements were performed using
a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer.
or and nickel ions were recorded on a 400 MHz instrument in
3
CDCl . Solutions were prepared by dissolving 3 mg 1–Ni or 1–Cu
complex in 0.7 mL CDCl
3
.
2.4. Crystallography
Single crystals of 1, 1–Cu and 1–Ni suitable of X-ray diffraction
were mounted on an Xcalibur Sapphire 3 diffractometer. The crys-
tal data for 1, 1–Cu and 1–Ni were collected at 297 K. The detailed
crystal data, collection and structure refinement parameters for 1
are given in Table 1. OLEX2 [38] GUI was employed to get the solu-
tion of the structure with the help of SHELXT/direct method [39] and
refinement was accomplished using SHELXL/least square program
2
2
.2. Synthesis
[
39]. All the non-hydrogen atoms in all the structures were refined
anisotropically. The hydrogen atoms present in CAH (aromatic),
ACH and ACH groups of different crystal structures reported in
this paper were placed at their appropriately calculated positions
CAH = 0.93 Å, ACH = 0.97 Å, ACH = 0.96 Å and treated with a
riding model such that Uiso (H 4CAH and ACH ) = 1.2Ueq(C), Uiso
H 4-CH ) = 1.5Ueq(C). The ACH groups were treated as ideal
.2.1. Synthesis of 1 [methyl 3-hydroxy-4-(morpholinomethyl)-2-
naphthoate]
In a 100 mL round bottom flask, methyl 3-hydroxy-2-naph-
thoate (1.0 g, 4.94 mmol) was mixed with paraformaldehyde
0.3 g, 9.9 mmol) and morpholine (0.7 mL, 8.11 mmol) and was
refluxed in 15 mL of benzene for 24 h. The resulting reaction mix-
ture was filtered and yellow crystals were formed after 1 h. Yield:
2
3
(
2
3
(
2
(
3
3
rotary groups during refinement. The NAH and OAH atoms in all
the structures were refined freely. Mercury software [40] was used
to prepare the graphics material for publication.
À1
(
2
(
7
1.38 g) 93%. M.pt. 118–123 °C. IR (KBr,
m
-cm ): 3432, 3230, 2949,
1
806, 2847, 2768, 1686, 1440, 1304, 1169, 1113, 1091. H NMR
400 MHz, DMSO-d , d): 8.46 (s, 1H), 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 MHz),
.95 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 MHz), 7.61–7.57 (t, 1H), 7.39–7.35 (t, 1H), 3.95
6
13
(
brs, 9H, CH
d): 169.2, 153.9, 136.2, 132.0, 129.8, 129.0, 126.6, 123.7, 123.6,
15.9, 115.0, 66.2, 53.0, 52.8, 52.0. HRMS (m/z) calculated for
2
, CH
3
) 3.52 (4H, CH
2
). C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
6
,
3. Results and discussion
1
[
3.1. Synthesis
+
17 4
C H19NO +H]: 302.1314 found [M+H] 302.1386.
The ligand 1 was synthesized as per Scheme 1 that involved a
reaction between 3-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid and methanol in
the presence of catalytic amount of sulfuric acid followed by a
Mannich reaction to yield 1 in good yield. The ligand 1 was charac-
terized spectroscopically and single crystal X-ray crystallography.
The ligand 1 was treated with copper and nickel acetate in
acetonitrile to yield single crystals, which were also analyzed
2
.2.2. Preparation of metal complexes
Suitable crystals of copper and nickel bound complexes were
grown through vapor diffusion method. However, multiple efforts
in crystallizing other metal ion (such as Mn , Fe , Co , Cd , Zn
Pb , Hg ) complexes were remain unsuccessful.
2+
3+
2+
2+
2+
,
2
+
2+