Organometallics
Communication
Scheme 3b revealed that complex 9b was the most stable among
complexes 5b−7b and 9b by the effect of silyl substituents. This
means that to move the two carbons back to the starting point in
complex 5, it is necessary that complex 5 should step out of the
equilibrium irreversibly by derivatization. Two hydrogen atoms
at the bridgehead carbons of complex 5 can be abstracted by
bridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cam-
bridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
2
6
azobenzene to give an indene derivative 11. Because
complexes 6, 7, and 9 do not have the two hydrogen atoms
capable of being abstracted, we expected that the reaction of
complex 9 with azobenzene gave indene derivative 11 through
the formation of complex 5.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
1
3
13
A
C-labeling experiment of complex 9b- C with
ORCID
13
azobenzene provided indene derivative 11b- C in a good
yield, as we expected (Scheme 3b). The 13C NMR study
demonstrated that three carbons in the five-membered ring and
traveling two carbons were in the same five-membered ring in
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
13
indene derivative 11b- C. This result clearly showed that
complex 9 was converted into complex 5 and then the two
hydrogen atoms of 5 were eliminated by azobenzene to produce
indene derivative 11. The two carbons, once moved to the
farthest positions as in complex 9 with the rotation of the six-
membered ring, came back to the starting point of complex 5.
The above results are summarized in Scheme 1b. The two
carbons starting from complex 5 traveled to the longest distance
position in complex 9 via complexes 6 and 7 because 9 was the
most stable complex among complexes 5−7 and 9 by the
substituent effect. The carbons that once moved to the longest
distance position, in turn, moved back to the starting position in
complex 5 with the effect of azobenzene. The hydrogen
elimination from complex 5 gave indene derivative 11, which
clearly showed that the two carbons came back to the starting
point. A different chemical drawing, as shown in Scheme 4,
REFERENCES
■
(
(
1) Bishop, K. C., III Transition Metal Catalyzed Rearrangements of
Small Ring Organic Molecules. Chem. Rev. 1976, 76, 461−486.
2) Crabtree, R. H. The Organometallic Chemistry of Alkanes. Chem.
Rev. 1985, 85, 245−269.
3) Murakami, M.; Ito, Y. Cleavage of Carbon−Carbon Single Bonds
(
by Transition Metals. In Activation of Unreactive Bonds and Organic
Synthesis; Murai, S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1999; pp 97−129.
(4) Rybtchinski, B.; Milstein, D. Metal Insertion into C−C Bonds in
Solution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 870−883.
(5) Takahashi, T.; Kanno, K. Carbon−carbon Bond Cleavage
Reaction Using Metallocenes. In Metallocene in Regio- and Stereoselective
Synthesis; Takahashi, T., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2005; Vol. 8, pp 217−
236.
(
6) Chen, F.; Wang, T.; Jiao, N. Recent Advances in Transition-Metal-
Catalyzed Functionalization of Unstrained Carbon−Carbon Bonds.
Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8613−8661.
(
7) Souillart, L.; Cramer, N. Catalytic C−C Bond Activations via
Scheme 4. Another Viewpoint on the Reaction: Traveling of
Three Carbons around the Six-Membered Ring and Coming
Back Home
Oxidative Addition to Transition Metals. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9410−
9464.
(8) Fumagalli, G.; Stanton, S.; Bower, J. F. Recent Methodologies
That Exploit C−C Single-Bond Cleavage of Strained Ring Systems by
Transition Metal Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9404−9432.
(
9) Watson, P. L.; Roe, D. C. β-Alkyl Transfer in a Lanthanide Model
for Chain Termination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6471−6473.
(
10) Crabtree, R. H.; Dion, R. P. Selective Alkane C−C Bond
Cleavage via Prior Dehydrogenation by a Transition Metal Complex. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 1260−1261.
(
11) Suggs, J. W.; Jun, C.-H. Directed Cleavage of Carbon−Carbon
Bonds by Transition Metals: The α-Bonds of Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
984, 106, 3054−3056.
12) Takahashi, T.; Fujimori, T.; Seki, T.; Saburi, M.; Uchida, Y.;
1
(
Rousset, C. J.; Negishi, E. Selective Skeletal Rearrangement by
Carbon−Carbon Bond Activation. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1
(
990, 182−183.
13) Gozin, M.; Weisman, A.; Ben-David, Y.; Milstein, D. Activation
of a carbon−carbon bond in solution by transition-metal insertion.
provides another viewpoint on the reaction where the three
carbons traveled around the six-membered ring and came back
home instead of the two carbons. This dual aspects are
important for the concept of “traveling of carbon atoms in
organic molecules: merry-go-round reaction”.
Nature 1993, 364, 699−701.
(14) Suzuki, H.; Takaya, Y.; Takemori, T.; Tanaka, M. Selective
Carbon−Carbon Bond Cleavage of Cyclopentadiene on a Trinuclear
Ruthenium Pentahydride Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
1
(
0779−10780.
15) Mitsudo, T.; Zhang, S.-W.; Watanabe, Y. Ruthenium Complex-
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
catalysed Dimerization of Norbornadiene to Pentacyclotetradecadiene.
■
*
S
Supporting Information
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 435−436.
(16) Chatani, N.; Morimoto, T.; Muto, T.; Murai, S. Highly Selective
Skeletal Reorganization of 1,6- and 1,7-Enynes to 1-Vinylcycloalkenes
Catalyzed by [RuCl (CO) ] . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6049−6050.
2
3 2
(17) Tillack, A.; Baumann, W.; Ohff, A.; Lefeber, C.; Spannenberg, A.;
Kempe, R.; Rosenthal, U. Intramolekulare Cyclisierung von terminal
disubstituierten α, ω-Diinen an Titanocen “Cp Ti” mit einer
2
C
Organometallics XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX