Organic Process Research & Development 2005, 9, 479−489
Aqueous Kolbe-Schmitt Synthesis Using Resorcinol in a Microreactor
Laboratory Rig under High-p,T Conditions
Volker Hessel,* C. Hofmann, P. Lo¨b, J. Lo¨hndorf, H. Lo¨we, and A. Ziogas
Institut fu¨r Mikrotechnik Mainz GmbH, Carl-Zeiss-Strasse 18-20, 55129 Mainz, Germany
Abstract:
reaction time. The use of higher temperatures has been
The aqueous Kolbe-Schmitt synthesis using resorcinol to yield
2,4-dihydroxy benzoic acid was performed in a microreactor
rig. This small-scale plant was equipped initially with one
capillary reactor and one microstructured cooler only. Later,
two upgraded versions were constructed, having in addition a
microstructured cooler and a microstructured mixer, respec-
tively. The chemical protocol was significantly varied as
compared to standard laboratory operation as described in the
literature. Higher temperatures (up to 220 °C) and pressures
(up to 74 bar) were employed in a facile manner, termed high-
p,T processing. In this way, the reaction time could be shortened
by orders of magnitude, from about 2 hours to less than one
minute, in some cases to some seconds. This resulted in a
remarkable increase of the space-time yield by a factor of 440
at best. Productivity was in the L/h range and yielded at best
111 g/h product, corresponding to 4 t/a. Scale-out solutions are
indicated. Drawbacks of the microreactor operation were also
identified such as high sensitivity to fouling and delicate
regulation of the system pressure, leading to partly unstable
plant operation. Possibly even a considerable part of the product
was rearranged to 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid and then ther-
mally decomposed under the harsh reaction conditions. Solu-
tions to overcome or at least diminish these restrictions are
envisaged, and in the hope that this may be achieved, a process
innovation and business perspective for the high-p,T microre-
actor processing is depicted.
reported in a few cases. However, this typically does not
exceed a few 10 °C. Bearing in mind that most of the
protocols take into account the relatively slow mass- and
heat-transfer characteristics of batch reactors (even concern-
ing small laboratory ones), it stands to reason that a
purposefully drastic tailored change in the operating condi-
tions is once required to exploit the full potential of
microreactor technology.
Reactions in batch processes actually often have features
of “domesticated” processing14 (see also ref 15), e.g. as given
by the typical addition of reactants drop-per-drop to exert
control over heat releases of highly exothermic reactions or
the replacement of very harsh reactants by slowly reacting
ones. Actually, batch processing has been established for
centuries,16,17 and the chemistry is made “around the reac-
tor”,17 i.e., adapted; when needed, it is “domesticated”14 rather
than customising the reactor for a chemical process. Now
that expertise on chemical micro process engineering is
growing, it is time to change the chemistry in microstructured
reactors. A list of specific measures has been prepared to
explain what exactly this implies. Among such issues are:14
• operation at unusually high temperatures and pressure
• solvent-free or reactant-rich solution processing
• operation in the explosive regimes
• use of unusually harsh reactants or unstable intermedi-
ates
• combining multiple reactions in a row
In the following, one of the first applications of the first
item is reported, i.e., to change a chemical protocol by
operating at much higher temperatures to reduce reaction
times and, in turn, to increase productivity. Since this
includes setting the pressure much higher to maintain a
single-phase liquid processing, such an approach is termed
high-p,T processing in the following. The Kolbe-Schmitt
synthesis reported in this paper is actually one of the two
1. Need for Adapted Chemical Protocols for Chemical
Micro Process Engineering: Enabling instead of
Subduing Chemistry
Microstructured reactors are these days typically employed
for niche processes where conventional equipment fails or
the performance is much too low.1-15 Typically, in a first
run the batch experimental protocols are mimicked. Often,
the batch protocols are adapted slightly thereafter, the main
difference probably being the notable shortening of the
(6) Ja¨hnisch, K.; Hessel, V.; Lo¨we, H.; Baerns, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 406.
(7) Hessel, V.; Lo¨we, H. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2003, 26, 13.
(8) Gavriilidis, A.; Angeli, P.; Cao, E.; Yeong, K. K.; Wan, Y. S. S. Trans.
Inst. Chem. Eng. A 2002, 80, 3.
(9) Jensen, K. F. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 293.
(10) Jensen, K. F. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 2051.
(11) Jensen, K. F. Nature 1998, 393, 735.
(12) Haswell, S. T.; Watts, P. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 240.
(13) Fletcher, P. D. I.; Haswell, S. J.; Pombo-Villar, E.; Warrington, B. H.; Watts,
P.; Wong, S. Y. F.; Zhang, X. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4735.
(14) Hessel, V.; Lo¨b, P.; Lo¨we, H. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 765.
(15) Hessel, V.; Lo¨b, P.; Lo¨we, H. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2005, 28, 267.
(16) Acricola, G. De Re Metallica; Froben, Episopius: Basel; Vol. XII, p 1556.
(17) Stankiewicz, A. I.; Moulijn, J. A. Chem. Eng. Prog. 2000, 1, 22.
* Corresponding author. Telephone: ++0049-6131-990450. Fax: ++0049-
(1) Hessel, V.; Hardt, S.; Lo¨we, H. Chemical Micro Process Engineering:
Fundamentals, Modelling and Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004.
(2) Hessel, V.; Kolb, G.; Mu¨ller, A.; Lo¨we, H. Chemical Micro Process
Engineering: Processing and Plants; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005.
(3) Pennemann, H.; Watts, P.; Haswell, S.; Hessel, V.; Lo¨we, H. Org. Process
Res. DeV. 2004, 8, 422.
(4) Pennemann, P.; Hessel, V.; Lo¨we, H. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 4789.
(5) Kolb, G.; Hessel, V. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 98, 1-38.
10.1021/op050045q CCC: $30.25 © 2005 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/07/2005
Vol. 9, No. 4, 2005 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
479