J Fluoresc
functioning here as a base, giving rise to the deprotonation
upon interaction with the receptor L [20]. Based on the
above experimental evidences, the possible complexation
modes of the receptor L was shown in Fig. 8.
Conclusions
We have introduced a simple chemosensor L for bioactive
anions. Sensor L portrayed a colorimetric change from yellow
to orange on interaction with F , AcO and H PO in 1:1
2 4
−5
−
−
−
The anion binding behavior of the receptor L (1.0×10 M)
was also investigated by fluorescence titrations in acetonitrile
stoichiometry in pure CH CN. In mixed solvent 1%H O:
3 2
(
4
Fig. 9). The sensor L showed an emission band centered at
90 nm (λ =430 nm). Upon addition of fluoride, there was a
CH CN, sensor L exhibited selective recognition towards
3
fluoride anion. In addition, receptor L can be implemented
to develop test paper kit for analytical application (Fig. 8).
More importantly, the fluorescence of L was quenched by
fluoride but enhanced by acetate. The enhancement and
quenching of L fluorescence can be helpful to discriminate
ex
significant quenching in the emission intensity of L. The
fluorescence quenching may be due to the intermolecular
hydrogen bonding interactions between fluoride and L, where
the hydrogen bond acts as an efficient accepting mode for
radiationless deactivation processes from the excited state via
internal conversion (IC) [21]. Interestingly, under similar con-
dition the fluorescence of receptor L was enhanced upon
incremental addition of acetate presumably because of the
formation of rigid acetate-L complex through multiple hydro-
gen bonding that restricts tautomeric transformation at the
excited state and therefore, ceases non-radiative decay and
consequently the emission intensity was increased [22]. Fur-
ther study under competitive environment inferred that the
receptor L with equivalent amount of both acetate and
fluoride ions showed fluorescence enhancement as ob-
served only with acetate.
In order to complement our experimental findings, struc-
tural optimization of receptor L and its host-guest complexes
were performed at B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level by focusing on
the proposed 1:1 binding modes between L and anions
(
[
for the complexes formed between receptor L and an-
ions to provide a useful scale to assess the relative
strengths of these interactions. The calculated results
−
−
the two bioactive anions AcO and F .
Acknowledgment This work was made possible by a grant from the
DST, New Delhi under Fast Track Young Scientist Scheme.
References
1. Bianchi A, Bowman-James K, Garcia-Espana E (1997) Supramo-
lecular chemistry of anions. Wiley-VCH, New York
2
. Gunnlaugsson T, Glynn M, Tocci GM, Kruger PE, Pfeffer FM
2006) Coord Chem Rev 250:3094–3117
. Gale PA (2003) Coord Chem Rev 240:191–221
(
3
4. Rhee HW, So JC, Sang HY, Yong OJ, Hun HP, Pinto RM,
Cameselle JC, Sandoval FJ, Roje S, Han K, Chung DS, Suh J,
Hong JI (2009) J Am Chem Soc 131:10107–10112
5
. Qu Y, Hua J, Tian H (2010) Org Lett 12:3320–3323
−
−
−
F , AcO and H PO ). The interaction (or binding) energies
2 4
6. Duke RM, Veale EB, Pfeffer FM, Kruger PE, Gunnlaugsson T
(2010) Chem Soc Rev 39:3936–3953
ΔE=Eelec(complex)-Eelec(anion)-Eelec(L)] were computed
7
8
9
. Dieng PS, Sirlin C (2010) Int J Mol Sci 11:3334–3348
. Liu G, Shao J (2012) J Fluoresc 22:397–401
. Maeda H, Ito Y (2006) Inorg Chem 45:8205–8210
1
0. Cho EJ, Ryu BJ, Lee YJ, Nam KC (2005) Org Lett 7:2607–2609
−
−1
−
[
ΔE(L-AcO )=−151.18 kJmol , ΔE(L-F )=−409.89
11. Zhou Y, Jung JY, Jeon HR, Kim Y, Kim S-J, Yoon (2011) J Org
Lett 13:2742–2745
12. Jose DA, Kumar DK, Ganguly B, Das A (2004) Org Lett 6:3445–
−1
−
−1
kJmol , ) ΔE(L-H PO )=−105.52 kJmol ] verify that
F forms the strongest complex with the receptor L. The
optimized global minimum structure of L and its L-F complex
2
4
−
3
448
−
1
3. Wenzel M, Hiscock JR, Gale PA (2012) Chem Soc Rev 41:480–
520
(Fig. 10) indicates that the receptor L preferred enolimine form
1
1
1
4. Gale PA (2010) Chem Soc Rev 39:3746–3771
5. Caltagirone C, Gale PA (2009) Chem Soc Rev 38:520–563
6. Gale PA, Garcia-Garrido SE, Garric J (2008) Chem Soc Rev
and the two OH moieties of L interacts with the anion through
hydrogen bonding to form the anion-receptor complex. Further
analysis of HOMO and LUMO diagrams (Fig. 11) of L and L-
3
7:151–190
−
F indicate the π→π* electronic transition and the internal
17. Frisch MJ et al (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford CT
charge transfer occurred during the anion recognition process.
The HOMO electron density distributed mainly over naphtha-
lene unit of L can also be observed over imine-N and phenolic
unit on interaction with fluoride ion because of the charge
delocalization occurred by deprotonation process. In addition,
the HOMO-LUMO band gap of L decreases on interaction
with anion, which supports the absorbance at longer wave-
length and orange coloration.
1
1
2
2
8. Sharma D, Bera RK, Sahoo SK (2013) Spectrochim Acta A
05:477–482
1
9. Paduka Ali HD, Kruger PE, Gunnlaugsson T (2008) New J Chem
32:1153–1161
0. Sharma D, Mistry AR, Bera RK, Sahoo SK (2012) Supramol
Chem 25:212–220
1. Prabhu S, Saravanamoorthy S, Ashok M, Velmathi S (2012) J
Luminescence 132:979–986
22. Shao J (2010) Dyes Pigments 87:272–276