Chemistry Letters Vol.35, No.4 (2006)
383
8
of 5a.
a could be obtained at higher temperature from the reaction
8
R3
O
6
In summary, the alkylideneallyl cation 2 generated from al-
kylidenecyclopropanone acetal 1 was employed for the reaction
R1
R
2
OMe
Me3SiO
R3
9
sp2-addition
with siloxyalkenes. The [3 þ 2] cycloaddition product and acy-
sp
clic addition product were obtained depending on the reaction
conditions, and all the products are the result of nucleophilic at-
1
R2
R
OMe
OMe
sp2
7
2
2
Me3SiO
tack at the sp center of alkylideneallyl cation 2. The regioselec-
1
0
OMe
3
R
tivity is compatible with charge distribution of the allylic cation
despite of varying the electronic nature and steric bulkiness of
the nucleophile from the simple alcoholic nucleophile.3
R1
2
R
,10
8, 9
R3
R1
O
References and Notes
1
a) H.-U. Siehl, H. Mayr, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 909.
b) H.-U. Siehl, in Dicoordinated Carbocations, ed. by Z.
Rappoport, P. J. Stang, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
2
R
Scheme 4.
1
997, Chap. 5, pp. 189–236.
after further treatments of the reaction mixture with TiCl4 to
convert to a stable form 8d (Entry 6). Structures of these cyclo-
adducts were determined by two-dimensional NMR including
2
a) H.-U. Siehl, S. Brixner, J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2004, 17,
1039. b) H.-U. Siehl, T. M u¨ ller, J. Gauss, J. Phys. Org.
Chem. 2003, 16, 577. c) Y. Apeloig, T. M u¨ ller, in Dicoordi-
nated Carbocations, ed. by Z. Rappoport, P. J. Stang, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997, Chap. 2, pp. 9–104.
M. Fujita, K. Fujiwara, H. Mouri, Y. Kazekami, T.
Okuyama, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8023.
The orientation of the five-membered ring of 7–9 is also
confirmed by the conversion reaction from 7 to 8 and 9.
The diene structure of 8 indicates that the siloxy of 7 is at
allylic position.
4
HMBC and HMQC measurements after isolation, and any other
1
regioisomers were not detected by GC or H NMR measure-
ments of the reaction mixtures. Judging from these structures,
3
4
8
and 9 must be secondary products derived from 7. To deter-
mine the pathways for formation of 8 and 9, some transforma-
tions of 7 were carried out by using the isolated 7c. Reaction
of 7c with TiCl4 gave 8c in 98% yield, and the TiCl4-mediated
reaction in the presence of 5c gave 9c in 91% yield. Thus, 8 and
9
should be the secondary products.
A plausible mechanism for the reactions of alkylideneallyl
5
6
A siloxy derivative of 2 could be generated from 1, but the
reaction of 1 with TiCl4 in the absence of 5 gives 3 selective-
ly. This suggests the allylic cation contains methoxy group.
a) [3 þ 2] cycloadditions via trimethylenemethane inter-
mediate have been reported in the reaction of 1,1-dialkoxy-
2-methylenecyclopropane with electron-deficient olefins.
The ring-opening reaction of the cyclopropane substrate
takes place between the C1 and C3, and is different from
the reaction of 1. b) E. Nakamura, S. Yamago, Acc. Chem.
Res. 2002, 35, 867, and references cited therein.
The vacant orbital at the sp carbon of 2 may be shielded by
the cyclohexane ring, but some nucleophiles including chlo-
ride and furans prefer the sp attack. So, the present selectivity
may be controlled mainly by the charge distribution.
cation 2 with siloxyalkenes 5 is illustrated in Scheme 4. The
5
cation 2 generated from 1 is trapped by siloxyalkene at the
2
sp position to give the cationic intermediate 10 stabilized by
the oxy group(s). Desilylation from 10 results in formation of
acyclic adduct 6, and intramolecular cyclization of 10 gives
6
the cycloadduct with such regioisomeric orientation. If the
6
b
stepwise [3 þ 2] cycloaddition were initiated by the addition at
the sp carbon of 2, the different orientation of the cycloadduct
should have been obtained. Thus, all the products 6–9 are the
7
8
2
result of nucleophilic attack at the sp carbon of 2. The regiose-
2
lective addition at the sp carbon of 2 is rationalized by the
charge distribution estimated from calculations and C NMR:
13
2
the sp carbon is more positive than the sp carbon of 2,5-dimeth-
ylhexa-3,4-dien-2-yl cation (2,5-dimethylhexa-2,4-dien-3-yl
cation).1
effect of the siloxyalkenes employed, and the reaction with
dimethylketene silyl acetal 5a allows the smooth connection of
the two contiguous quaternary carbon centers.
For the reaction with 5a, alternative pathways for the cyclic
product 8a are also possible owing to the symmetric nature
of the five-membered ring. However, the common pathways
in the cycloadditions of 5a–5d are limited, and one of the
simple pathways to cycloadducts is shown in Scheme 4.
Mukaiyama–Michael addition of 5 to 7 can be an alternative
pathway to the double addition product 9. Although some
details during the formation of 8 and 9 are uncertain, the
a,2a,7
The regioselectivity is not affected by the steric
The reaction with silyl enol ether 5c and 5d gave only the
[
3 þ 2] cycloadducts in comparison with effective formation
2
of acyclic adduct 6 in the reaction with ketene silyl acetal 5a
and 5b at lower reaction temperature. This can be explained
by the reactivity of cationic intermediates 10: The intermediate
from 5c and 5d is more reactive owing to lower stabilization
by oxy group than that from 5a, 5b, and reacts with the internal
allene more efficiently to give the cycloadduct(s). Cyclic product
electrophilic reaction site of 2 is the sp center.
9
Lewis acid-mediated reactions of cyclopropanes with
siloxyalkenes, see: a) M. Ohno, S. Matsuoka, S. Eguchi,
J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 4553. b) K. Saigo, S. Shimada, T.
Shibasaki, M. Hasegawa, Chem. Lett. 1990, 1093.
10 C. A. Grob, R. Spaar, Helv. Chim. Acta 1970, 53, 2119.