Please do not adjust margins
Catalysis Science & Technology
Page 5 of 7
DOI: 10.1039/C5CY01892G
Journal Name
epoxides. (R)-8a was transformed to (R)-8b in 98% 3.5 Hz, 1H). C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl
ARTICLE
1
3
3
): 154.8, 74.7, 67.0, 44.6. All
enantiomeric excess (ee), while (R)-10b was obtained with the data are consistent with that previously reported. See the
some loss in optical purity (84% ee) (Table 4). It can be Supporting Information for characterization data of other
concluded that reaction at the β-carbon of epoxide seems compounds.
favorable (Scheme 2, path A). Epoxide (R)-10a has lower
potential steric hindrance and higher reactivity than (R)-8a
;
Notes and references
thus, as for (R)-10b, the ee loss may be attributed to the
nucleophilic attack on the α-carbon of the epoxide by the
bromide anion, which may also be followed by a bromide-
bromide ion exchange process to eventually afford the (S)-10b
1
E. A. Quadrelli, G. Centi, J.L. Duplan and S. Perathoner,
ChemSusChem, 2011, , 1194.
(a) J. Louie, Curr. Org. Chem., 2005,
4
2
9, 605; (b) B.H. Xu, J. Q.
1
9
Wang, J. Sun, Y. Huang, J. P. Zhang, X. P. Zhang and S. J.
Zhang, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 108; (c) L. J. Murphy, K. N.
Robertson, R. A. Kemp, H. M. Tuononend and J. A. C.
Clyburne, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 3942.
product (Scheme 2, path B). When only DBU was used as a
catalyst, (R)-10b was obtained in 35% yield, but with retention
of stereochemistry (>99% ee), which indicates that direct
nucleophilic attack of carbamate salt
C
on the epoxide
3
4
T. Sakakura, J. C. Choi and H. Yasuda, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
2
365.
(a) I. Omae, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2012, 256, 1384; (b) X.-B. Liu
and J. Darensbourg, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1462; (c) C.
proceeds exclusively at the less sterically hindered carbon
1
2a,b
atom.
This further demonstrates the possible role of the
bromide anion in path B for the ring-opening process.
Maeda, Y. Miyazakia and T. Ema, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014,
482; (d) Q. Liu, L. P. Wu, R. Jackstell and M. Beller, Nat
Comms, 2015, , 5933.
(a) W. H. Meyer, Adv. Mater., 1998, 10, 439; (b) M.
Mikkelsen, M. Jørgensen and F. C. Krebs, Energy Environ. Sci.,
010, , 43. (c) M. North, R. Pasquale and C. Young, Green
4,
1
6
Conclusions
5
In summary, a simple, inexpensive and efficient binary
organocatalytic system consisting of DBU and benzyl bromide
was developed for the synthesis of cyclic carbonates from
2
3
Chem., 2010, 12, 1514; (d) J. H. Clements, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 2003, 42, 663; (e) A.A. G. Shaikh and S. Sivaram, Chem.
Rev., 1996, 96, 951; (f) T. Sakakura and K. Kohno, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 1312. (g) O. Crowther, D. Keeny, D. M.
Moureau, B. Meyer, M. Salomon and M. Hendrickson, J.
Power Sources, 2012, 202, 347.
2
epoxides and CO under metal- and solvent-free conditions. A
diverse range of epoxides was transformed into the
corresponding cyclic carbonates with good-to-excellent yields
(
81-95%) under very mild conditions (65
°
C, 1 atm CO
2
).
6
(a) J. Tharun, G. Mathai, A. C. Kathalikkattil, R. Roshan, J. Y.
Kwak and D. W. Park, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 1673; (b) S. G.
Liang, H. Z. Liu, T. Jiang, J. L. Song, G. Y. Yang and B. X. Han,
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2131.
(a) D. S. Bai, S. H. Duan, L. Hai and H. W. Jing, ChemCatChem,
2012, 4, 1752; (b) T. Ema, Y. Miyazaki, T. Taniguchi and J.
Takada, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 2485.
(a) J. Melendez, M. North and P. Villuendas, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 2577; (b) A. Decortes, A. M. Castilla and A.
W. Kleij, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9822; (c) M. North
and R. Pasquale, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2946.
(a) Y. Zhang, S. Yin, S. Luo and C. T. Au, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
2012, 51, 3951; (b) J. Sun, J. Wang, W. Cheng, J. Zhang, X. Li,
S. Zhang and Y. She, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 654.
0 (a) J. L. He, T. B. Wu, Z. F. Zhang, K. L. Ding, B. Han, Y. Xie, T.
Jiang and Z. Liu, Chem.Eur. J., 2007, 13, 6992; (b) J. Langanke,
L. Greiner and W. Leitner, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 1173.
Furthermore, optically pure epoxides were also investigated,
and a plausible mechanism for the coupling reaction of
epoxide with CO
2
was proposed. The proposed protocol
7
8
provides an example of an easily handled, commercially viable,
and environmentally benign alternative for chemical fixation of
2
CO into 5-membered cyclic carbonates.
Experimental section
9
1
All starting materials and solvents commercially available were
purchased at the highest quality from Sigma-Aldrich or Wako
and used as received unless otherwise indicated. Chemical
1
yields refer to the pure isolated substances. H (500 MHz) and
1
3
C (125 MHz) NMR spectra were obtained using a Brucker AV- 11 (a) Q. W. Song, L. N. He, J. Q. Wang, H. Yasuda and T.
Sakakura, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 110; (b) Y. P. Ren and J. J.
Shim, ChemCatChem, 2013, , 1344.
5
00 (500 MHz) spectrometer. The chemical shifts of the
products were reported in ppm with reference to Me Si as the
internal standard in CDCl solution. Enantiomeric excesses of
5
4
1
1
1
2 (a) H. Zhou, Y. M. Wang, W. Z. Zhang, J. P. Qu and X. B. Lu,
Green Chem., 2011, 13, 644; (b) H. Zhou, W. Z. Zhang, C.H.
Liu, J. P. Qu and X. B. Lu, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 8039; (c) Y.
Kayaki, M. Yamamoto and T. Ikariya, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
3
the carbonates were determined by HPLC analyses with a
Daicel Chiralcel OD-3 with detection at 254 nm.
2
009, 48, 4194.
3 (a) Z. Z. Yang, L. N. He, Y. N. Zhao, B. Li and B. Yu, Energy
Environ. Sci., 2011, , 3971; (b) C. M. Wang, H. M. Luo, X. Y.
Representative procedure for the cyclic carbonate formation
(
4b): In a 20 mL two-neck flask, epichlorohydrin 4a (6 mmol, 0.555
g), DBU (5 mol%, 0.046g) and PhCH Br (5 mol%, 0.051g) were added
under N gas and then stirred at 65 C for 22 h under an
atmosphere of CO (99.999%, balloon). After completion, the
reaction mixture was purified by column chromatography
hexane:ethyl acetate = 1:1) to afford the desired cyclic carbonate
4
2
Luo, H. R. Li and S. Dai, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 2019; (c) X.
Wang, Y. N. Lim, C. Lee, H. Y. Jang and B. Y. Lee, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2013, 2013, 1867.
4 (a) Y. M. Shen, W. L. Duan and M. Shi, J. Org. Chem., 2003,
68, 1559; (b) Y. M. Shen, W. L. Duan and M. Shi, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2004, 2004, 3080; (c) C. D. N. Gomes, O. Jacquet, C.
Villiers, P. Thuery, M. Ephritikhine and T. Cantat, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 187; (d) J. Sun, W. G. Cheng, Z. F.
Yang, J. Q. Wang, T. T. Xu, J. Y. Xin and S. J. Zhang, Green
Chem., 2014, 16, 3071; (e) U. R. Seo and Y. K. Chung, Adv.
o
2
2
(
0
.778g (yield: 95.0%).
1
3
H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl ): 5.12−5.01 (m, 1H), 4.69−4.55 (m, 1H),
4
.48−4.35 (m, 1H), 3.89 (dd, J = 12.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dd, J = 12.5,
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins