B. L. Wilkinson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 1355–1357
1357
5. Parrish, N.; Houston, T.; Jones, P. B.; Townsend, C. A.;
Dick, J. D. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1143.
6. Centrone, C. A.; Lowary, T. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004,
12, 5495.
7. Joshi, S.; Khosla, N.; Tiwari, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004,
12, 571.
8. For bis(N-alkylsulfonamides) on a trehalose core with
activity against tuberculosis, see: Rose, J. D.; Maddry, J.
A.; Comber, R. N.; Suling, W. J.; Wilson, L. N.;
Reynolds, R. C. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 105.
9. Wilkinson, B. L.; Bornaghi, L. F.; Houston, T. A.;
Innocenti, A.; Supuran, C. T.; Poulsen, S.-A. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 49, 6539.
also assayed. All assays were performed in duplicate and
incubated overnight at 37 ꢁC.
Procedure for anti-fungal screening. Compounds were
tested against C. albicans. Test cultures were prepared by
inoculating 10 mL of YM broth with a loop of fresh C.
albicans culture. This culture was grown for 18 h at 37 ꢁC
to give a culture with an optical density (OD) of 0.3 at
595 nm, corresponding to a cell density of 5 · 109 cells/mL.
A 100 lL aliquot of this culture was added to 500 mL of
fresh YM broth and well mixed. Assays were carried out
in 96-well microtiter plates in an assay volume of
200 lL—made up of culture (198 lL ꢀ 2 · 105 cells) and
test compound in DMSO (final DMSO concentration of
1% v/v). Controls that contained no test compound
(DMSO 1% v/v) and antibiotic (25 lg/mL amphotericin
B—as a no growth control) were also assayed. All assays
were performed in duplicate and incubated for 48 h at
37 ꢁC.
10. Wilkinson, B. L.; Bornaghi, L. F.; Poulsen, S.-A.; Hous-
ton, T. A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8115.
11. 4-Azidobenzenesulfonamide (6) was prepared as reported
in: Das, J.; Patil, S. N.; Awasthi, R.; Narasimhulu, C. P.;
Trehan, S. Synthesis 2005, 11, 1801. The general syntheses
for 2, 7, and 8 are as follows: The acetylene (0.25 M) and
azide (0.25 M) were suspended in a 1:1 mixture of tert-
butyl alcohol and distilled H2O. CuSO4Æ5H2O (0.1 equiv)
and sodium ascorbate (0.2 equiv) were added and the
suspension stirred at 40 ꢁC and monitored by TLC
(completion occurred within 2 h). The mixture was evap-
orated and the crude residue purified by chromatography
on silica (100% EtOAc as eluant) to afford analytically
pure material.
Procedure for anti-mycobacterial screening. Compounds
were tested against Mycobacterium smegmatis (ACM916).
Test cultures were prepared by inoculating M. smegmatis
from precultures into approximately 20 mL of Middle-
brook broth in a 50 mL falcon tube. The culture was
vortexed briefly and placed in an incubator at 37 ꢁC, and
120 rpm for 3 days. This culture was then sonicated until
all cells were thoroughly dispersed and then diluted 1:20
into Middlebrook broth to a final volume of 300 mL.
Assays were carried out in 96-well microtiter plates in an
assay volume of 200 lL made up of culture (195 lL) and
test compound in DMSO (final DMSO concentration of
2.5% v/v). Controls that contained no test compound
(DMSO 2.5% v/v) and antibiotic (50 mg/mL streptomy-
cin solution—for a no growth control) were also assayed.
All assays were performed in duplicate. An initial
absorbance reading was taken at 595 nm and the plates
incubated in a humidified incubator at 37 ꢁC for 96 h. At
the end of this period plates were removed form the
incubator and allowed to equilibrate to room tempera-
ture (25 ꢁC).
(1-(4-Sulfamoylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl-4-
sulfamoylbenzoate (7): 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d
5.53 (s, 2H, OCH2), 7.50 (br s, 2H, SO2NH2), 7.54 (br s,
2H, SO2NH2), 7.93–8.01 (m, 4H, Ar CH), 8.12–8.16 (m,
4H, Ar CH), 9.06 (s, 1H, triazole CH); 13C {1H} NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 58.90 (OCH2), 121.15 (Ar CH),
124.06 (triazole CH), 126.77 (Ar CH), 128.18 (Ar CH),
130.78 (Ar CH), 123.66 (Ar C), 139.15 (Ar C), 143.90 (Ar
C), 144.67 (triazole C), 148.95 (Ar C), 165.17 (C@O);
ESIMS: m/z [MꢁH]ꢁ 436.2.
4-Sulfamoyl-N-((1-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-
1
4-yl)methyl)benzamide (8): H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-
d6): d 4.62 (d, 3JCH–NH = 5.6 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 4.76 (br s,
4H, SO2NH2 · 2), 7.89–8.12 (m, 8H, Ar CH), 8.80 (s, 1H,
triazole CH), 9.32 (t, 3JNH–CH = 5.6 Hz, 1H, NH); ESIMS:
m/z [MꢁH]ꢁ 435.3.
For all anti-microbial assays optical densities (ODs) were
recorded at 595 nm at the start and end of the assay
incubation periods. The test compound activity was
calculated as a percent of control according to the
4-(4-(Hydroxymethyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)benzenesulf-
following equation: Activity
%
of control = 100 ·
1
onamide (2): H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 4.60 (d,
([T0(sample) ꢁ Tend(sample)] ꢁ [T0(neg ctl) ꢁ Tend(neg ctl)])/([T0(pos ctl)
ꢁ
3
3
2H, JCH–OH = 5.2 Hz, 2H, CH2OH), 5.34 (t, JOH–
CH = 5.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 7.48 (br s, 2H, SO2NH2), 7.97–
8.12 (m, 4H, Ar CH), 8.76 (s, 1H, triazole CH); ESIMS: m/
z [MꢁH]ꢁ 253.2.
Tend(pos ctl)] ꢁ [T0(neg ctl) ꢁ Tend(neg ctl)]).
13. Pauli, G. F.; Case, R. J.; Inui, T.; Wang, Y.; Cho, S.;
Fischer, N. H.; Franzblau, S. G. Life Sci. 2005, 78, 485.
14. Waagmeester, A.; Thompson, J.; Reyrat, J.-M. Trends
Microbiol. 2005, 13, 505.
12. Procedure for anti-bacterial screening. Compounds were
tested against S. aureus (ATCC 25923), E. coli (ATCC
25922), and V. harveyi (strain C071). Anti-microbial
assays were all conducted in a similar fashion with all
manipulations for S. aureus performed in PYE media
15. Krueger-Theimer, E.; Wempe, E.; Toepfer, M. Arzneim.-
Forsch. 1965, 15, 1309.
17. Scozzafava, A.; Mastrolorenzo, A.; Supuran, C. T. Expert
Opin. Ther. Patents 2006, 16, 1627.
(peptone 10 gLꢁ1, yeast extract 5 gLꢁ1, and NaCl 5 gLꢁ1
)
and manipulations of E. coli and V. harveyi performed in
LB media (BD, Brisbane, Australia). A single colony was
inoculated into 20 mL of sterile growth media and grown
overnight. This culture was then diluted 1000-fold into
fresh media the following day. Assays were carried out in
96-well microtiter plates in an assay volume of 200 lL—
made up of culture (198 lL) and test compound in DMSO
(final DMSO concentration of 1% v/v). Controls that
contained no test compound (DMSO 1% v/v) and antibi-
otic (500 lg/mL ampicillin—as a no growth control) were
18. Pastorekova, S.; Parkkila, S.; Pastorek, J.; Supuran, C. T.
J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2004, 19, 199.
19. Covarrubias, A. S.; Larsson, A. M.; Ho¨gbom, M.;
Lindberg, J.; Bergfors, T.; Bjo¨rkelid, C.; Mowbray, S.
L.; Unge, T.; Jones, T. A. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280,
18782.
20. Klengel, T.; Liang, W.-J.; Chaloupka, J.; Ruoff, C.;
Schro¨ppel, K.; Naglik, J. R.; Eckert, S. E.; Mogensen,
E. G.; Heynes, K.; Tuite, M. F.; Levin, L. R.; Buck, J.;
Muhlschlegel, F. A. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 2021.
¨