Communications
Comparison of the performance of the illuminated sample
desired location, time, and dosage, for example, in micro/
nanosensory and delivery devices.
with an uncaged sample at the same pH (Figure 4b, black
bars) indicated that the expected activity of 4 after removal of
its protecting group was recovered, and therefore that
photocleavage was complete.
The caged modulator was also used to address the
reversibility of the pH-induced opening of the channel. To
this end, duplicate samples were illuminated at pH 5.7.
Subsequently, the pH of one of the samples was raised to
Received: September 26, 2005
Revised: December 7, 2005
Published online: April 4, 2006
Keywords: biosensors · drug delivery · membrane proteins ·
.
protein modifications · protonation
7
.7. Although release started during illumination in both
samples, the process was arrested immediately after the pH
was raised to 7.7 (Figure 4b, white bar with horizontal lines),
while continuing at low pH (Figure 4b, white bar). This
experiment shows that the modified pH-sensitive channels
can be closed through a protonation reaction. Unfortunately,
the time course and sensitivity of the liposomal release
experiment do not allow this cycle to be repeated a number of
times with the same sample. Therefore, further investigation
is required to conclusively prove that the pH-induced opening
of the channel is reversible, that is, that the closed state at high
pH after removal of the cage is identical to the closed state
after a cycle of low and high pH.
The pH modulators described herein were able to confer
pH responsiveness to the channel, as shown from patch-clamp
and efflux measurements. However, the measurements also
show that complete release of enclosed calcein was not
achieved. Although this effect is not fully understood, a
number of explanations can be put forward. For example, the
reconstitution procedure does not guarantee that an active
channel is associated with every liposome. Furthermore, in
the case of the pH modulators, the ionization of one group
[
1] H. Bayley, O. Braha, S. Cheley, L. Gu in Nanobiotechnology
Eds.: C. M. Niemeyer, C. A. Mirkin), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2004, pp. 93 – 112.
(
[2] S. I. Sukharev, P. Blount, B. Martinac, F. R. Blattner, C. Kung,
Nature 1994, 368, 265 – 268.
[
[
[
3] C. Berrier, A. Coulombe, C. Houssin, A. Ghazi, FEBS Lett.
989, 259, 27 – 32.
4] P. Blount, S. I. Sukharev, P. C. Moe, M. J. Schroeder, H. R. Guy,
C. Kung, EMBO J. 1996, 15, 4798 – 4805.
5] N. Levina, S. Totemeyer, N. R. Stokes, P. Louis, M. A. Jones, I. R.
Booth, EMBO J. 1999, 18, 1730 – 1737.
1
[6] E. Perozo, A. Kloda, D. M. Cortes, B. Martinac, Nat. Struct. Biol.
002, 9, 696 – 703.
2
[
[
[
7] C. C. Cruickshank, R. F. Minchin, A. C. Le Dain, B. Martinac,
Biophys. J. 1997, 73, 1925 – 1931.
8] B. Ajouz, C. Berrier, A. Garrigues, M. Besnard, A. Ghazi, J. Biol.
Chem. 1998, 273, 26670 – 26674.
9] A. Anishkin, C. S. Chiang, S. Sukharev, J. Gen. Physiol. 2005,
125, 155 – 170.
[10] K. Yoshimura, A. Batiza, M. Schroeder, P. Blount, C. Kung,
Biophys. J. 1999, 77, 1960 – 1972.
[
11] K. Yoshimura, A. Batiza, C. Kung, Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2198 –
206.
2
[
12] A. Koçer, M. Walko, W. Meijberg, B. L. Feringa, Science 2005,
309, 755 – 758.
will depress the pK of its neighbors in close proximity in the
a
homopentameric protein. The accumulation of five positive
charges will therefore only be achieved at much lower
pH values, and hence the overall activity of the protein will
appear to be lower. This proposal was confirmed by showing
that modification of the protein with [2-(trimethylammo-
[13] K. Ulbrich, V. Sˇ ubr, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2004, 56, 1023 –
1050.
[
14] A. Fischer, M. J. Kung, F. P. Robinson, Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56,
072– 3077.
3
[
15] E. C. Kornfeld, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 4425 – 4427.
[
16] S. Glasstone, E. F. Hammel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 243 –
+
nio)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate (MTSET ), which carries a
248.
charge under all experimental conditions used here and thus
results in five positive charges in the channel constriction,
leads to maximum release values close to 100% (see
Supporting Information). Finally, it has been reported that
when the number of MscLs was low in the patches, the
[
17] J. Martin, R. Mendez, T. Alemany, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans.
1989, 223 – 226.
[18] J. Hine, C. D. Fischer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6513 – 6521.
[
[
[
19] J. Hine, M. S. Cholod, R. A. King, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
35 – 845.
20] J. L. Bartlett, G. Levin, P. Blount, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
004, 101, 10161 – 10165.
8
[
25]
channel activity was followed by irreversible inactivation.
2
A combination of the latter two effects, that is, reduced
activity and inactivation with time, will lead to release values
below 100%.
In summary, we have converted a bacterial channel
protein into a pH-sensitive valve. When embedded in lip-
osomes, the modified channels sense the ambient pH and
conditionally release the liposomal content. The sensitivity
and pH interval for channel opening were tuned by varying
21] G. Chang, R. H. Spencer, A. T. Lee, M. T. Barclay, D. C. Rees,
Science 1998, 282, 2220 – 2226.
[22] I. Iscla, G. Levin, R. Wray, R. Reynolds, P. Blount, Biophys. J.
2004, 87, 3172– 3180.
[
[
23] G. Levin, P. Blount, Biophys. J. 2004, 86, 2862 – 2870.
24] J. L. Rigaud, B. Pitard, D. Levy, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995,
1
231, 223 – 246.
25] C. C. Hꢀse, A. C. Le Dain, B. Martinac, J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270,
8329 – 18334.
[
1
the hydrophobicity and pK of the modulators. Additional
a
control over pH response was gained through the introduc-
tion of a photosensitive caging group. Gaining control over
MscL channel activity as presented herein is valuable for
further investigations into the mechanism of the channel
function. The pH-activated channel or caged channels can
also serve as control valves to release or mix the contents at a
3
130
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3126 –3130