42
P. Serna, A. Corma / Journal of Catalysis 315 (2014) 41–47
In the present investigation, we report such
a
catalyst,
STREM (AUROliteTM); d, the preceding catalyst after being used
in the coupling of benzene at 413 K and 12 bar for 100 h; e, sample
c after deposition of 0.5 wt% Pd by incipient wetness technique; f,
3 wt% Au/TiO2 sample prepared by deposition–precipitation of
HAuCl4 at pH = 9 and calcined under static atmosphere of air at
673 K. (B) Particle size distributions, as determined from the corre-
sponding HAADF-STEM and/or HRTEM images, of the preceding
catalysts and the following: a, sample c treated in 50 mL/min of
air at 1 bar and 673 K; b, sample d treated in 50 mL/min of air at
1 bar and 673 K; g, 3 wt% Au/TiO2 sample prepared by deposi-
tion–precipitation of HAuCl4 at pH = 6 and calcined under static
atmosphere of air at 673 K. (C) Dependence of the TOF per external
gold atom on the average particle size during the solvent-free cou-
pling of benzene at 12 bar of O2 and 413 K for the series of catalysts
in (B). The selectivity to biphenyl was always >98%. Experimental
details are provided in SI.
prompted by the realization that gold is active for a number of
CAC bond formation reactions not only when is present in the form
of a soluble metal salt, but also when arranged as small nanoparti-
cles [22–26], and that the latter work notably better in processes
that involve O2 dissociation [27–32]. Our results demonstrate
another remarkable feature of gold in heterogeneous catalysis
[33–37].
2. Experimental methods
2.1. Catalysts preparation
1 wt% Au/TiO2, 1 wt% Au/Al2O3, and 1 wt% Au/ZnO catalysts
were used as received from STREM (AUROliteTM catalysts). The
catalysts can be prepared following a deposition–precipitation
method from HAuCl4, as described elsewhere [32].
Pt/Al2O3, Rh/TiO2, Ni/TiO2, and Pd/TiO2 samples were prepared
by incipient wetness technique. H2PtCl6 (hexahydrate, Aldrich,
>37.5 as Pt), Ni(NO3)2 (hexahydrate, Fluka, >98.5%), RhCl3
(Aldrich, Rh content 40%) and PdCl2 (Aldrich, 99%) were used to
impregnate TiO2 (Degussa P-25) in water. As an example, 20 mL
of an aqueous solution containing 13.27 mg of H2PtCl6Á6H2O
was contacted with 1 g of TiO2 to prepare the 0.5 wt% Pt/TiO2 cat-
alyst. After a perfect mixing of the corresponding slurries, sam-
ples were dried at 373 K during 12 h. Some samples were
reduced in flow of H2 at 723 K for 3 h before reaction, as specified
in Table 1.
To prepare Au/TiO2 catalysts with variable particle sizes, HAuCl4
was deposited on TiO2 at a controlled pH. This method allows con-
trolling the degree of metal aggregation by choice of the metal
loading, the pH of the deposition, and the activation conditions,
as reported [38]. Table S1 (below) provides details of the synthesis
of Au/TiO2 catalysts characterized by average particle sizes of 7.2
and 14.4 nm, respectively.
2.2. Oxidative coupling of arenes
Catalytic testing was performed in a reinforced glass reactor
(2 mL volume) equipped with a temperature and pressure control
and stirred magnetically. Catalytic testing was performed in a rein-
forced glass reactor (2 mL volume) equipped with a temperature
and pressure control and stirred magnetically. The reactor vessel
was bought to Supelco (Reference 2-7037) and modified to allow
pressurization and/or extraction of liquids through a gas-tight nee-
dle. A 100
lL gas-tight syringe was used to get 15–20 lL aliquots at
the various reaction times.
Before each experiment, all the material was washed with
abundant acetone and dried at 383 K for >5 h. It is important to
avoid acetone and other polar molecules in the reaction mixture
to get optimal results. In a typical experiment, 891 mg of the
aromatic compound was placed in the reactor together with
30–70 mg of catalyst and 9 mg of dodecane as an internal standard.
Reactants were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich with purities above
99% and used as received. The reactor atmosphere was purged with
O2 at room temperature, pressurized with 12 bar of O2 and placed
into a silicon oil bath pre-heated at the desired reaction tempera-
ture. We systematically assigned time = 0 (start of the kinetic
experiment) 30 s after the reactor had been immersed into the
silicon oil bath. During the experiment, the pressure was kept at
12 bar, and the stirring rate was fixed at 700 r.p.m. Aliquots were
taken at different times until the end of the experiment. The com-
position of these aliquots was determined with a gas chromato-
graph equipped with a FID detector and a 30 m HP-5 capillary
column. Conversions and selectivities were calculated from the
GC areas of the products corrected with the response factors
determined experimentally. The products were identified by mass
spectrometry using a GC/MS device (Agilent MDS-5973) equipped
with a quadrupole electron-impact ionization detector (spectra
provided in SI). Pure, commercially available compounds were
used to compare the biaryls mass spectra and their GC retention
times. We also performed HPLC analyses to evaluate the potential
presence of heavier compounds. A Varian ProStar 240 device
The bimetallic Au@Pd/TiO2 catalyst was synthesized by impreg-
nation of the Au/TiO2 catalyst with a solution of PdCl2 to have a
final Au/Pd mol ratio of approximately 1. This catalyst was thor-
oughly washed with deionized water and dried at 373 K for 12 h
before reaction.
The following information guides the identification of each of
the samples in Fig. 2: (A) c, 1 wt% Au/TiO2 sample supplied by
Table 1
Catalytic performance of several metal-based samples for the O2-assisted coupling of
benzene at 413 K and 12 bar.
Entry Catalyst
% Med (mol) TOFe (hÀ1
)
TONf (mol/mol)
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1%Au/TiO2
0.022
0.041
0.041
0.014
0.075
0.298
–
0.043
0.022
0.022
0.01
382
0.21
0
0
0
0
0
0.02
244
254
0
230
<1
0
0
0
0
0
<1
164
158
0
b
c
1% Pd/TiO2
1% Pd/TiO2
c
0.5% Pt/TiO2
c
1% Ni/TiO2
b
5% Rh/TiO2
b
TiO2
b
1% Au@0.5% Pd/TiO2
a
equipped with a column Mediterranea C18 (5
l
m, 25 Â 0.46 mm)
1% Au/Al2O3
10
11
12
1% Au/ZnOa
HAuCl4
was used; the mobile phase was acetonitrile/ethanol in a 30:70
ratio, and the flow was 0.5 mL/min; and detection was done using
a PDA UV–Vis detector at a wavelength of 254 nm.
(CH3)Au(PPh3)
0.01
0
0
Some reactions were scaled-up (15 g of substrate) and the prod-
ucts purified by removal of the starting reactants in a rotatory
evaporator at temperatures in the range 313–333 K. Isolated yields
were calculated and are reported in the SI. 1H NMR and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or CD2Cl2 with tetramethylsilane
as the internal standard at 298 K on a Bruker Avance 300 (spectra
provided in SI).
Turnovers calculated per metal atom on the external surface of the nanoparticles
[33]. Experimental details provided in SI.
a
Supplied by STREM (AUROlite™ catalysts).
Dried at 373 K before reaction.
b
c
Preactivated in H2 at 723 K before reaction.
Mol of metal  mol of benzeneÀ1  100.
d
Turnover frequency (mol of benzene converted  mol of metalÀ1  hÀ1).
e
f
Turnover number (mol of benzene converted  mol of metalÀ1).