4
062
A. J. Fielding, B. P. Roberts / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 4061–4064
Initial experiments were carried out with the 2-methyl-
1:2.8 in both cases. Simple distillation afforded 6 in
85% isolated yield and chromatography on silica gel
yielded pure 6Z, a sample of which was then heated
under reflux in octane for 2.5 h in the presence of PFTP
and DBPB (10 mol% of each). Isomerisation of the silyl
enol ether took place to give a final E:Z ratio of 1:2.8,
indicating that thermodynamic equilibrium between 6E
and 6Z is established under the conditions used to
convert 5 to 6. The radical-chain mechanism for the
isomerisation of allyl silyl ethers to silyl enol ethers is
illustrated in Scheme 3 and the function of the thiol is
to act as a protic polarity reversal catalyst to promote
the overall abstraction of allylic hydrogen from the
allyloxysilane by the allylic radical 7, a reaction that is
slow in the absence of thiol because of the lack of
favourable charge-transfer stabilisation of the transition
6
allyloxysilane 3 and conversion to the silyl enol ether 4
1
(
Scheme 2) was monitored by H NMR spectroscopy.
When a solution of 3 (1 mol) and azobis(isobutyro-
3
nitrile) (AIBN, 10 mol%) in dry benzene (1.5 cm ) was
heated under reflux under nitrogen for 2.5 h, the allyl
silyl ether was unchanged and no silyl enol ether was
detectable. However, when the experiment was repeated
in the additional presence of pentafluorothiophenol
(
PFTP, 10 mol%), clean and complete conversion of 3
to 4 took place. The same result was obtained when the
AIBN was replaced by dilauroyl peroxide (DLP, 10
mol%), whereas without any initiator but in the pres-
ence of thiol, no conversion to silyl enol ether was
observed. Choice of the thiol catalyst proved to be
critical since, under otherwise identical conditions, thio-
phenol, tert-dodecanethiol and tri-tert-butoxysilane-
thiol gave conversions to 4 of 21, 5 and 17%, respec-
5
state. The allylic radical 7 exists in syn and anti forms,
that can be detected separately by EPR spectroscopy at
7
11
tively.
low temperature, and trapping of 7-anti by the thiol
presumably gives the E-isomer of the silyl enol ether,
while trapping of 7-syn will give the Z-isomer.
Although these results point strongly to a radical-chain
mechanism for the isomerisation of 3 to 4, in principle,
some form of acid-catalysed process might be involved,
In order for effective thiol-catalysed conversion of an
allylic molecule to a more stable vinylic isomer (Scheme
4, D=electron-donating substituent), both reactions a
and c must be rapid. Furthermore, removal of thiol by
radical addition to the double bonds in the reactant or
8
the acid being generated in situ during the reaction. In
order to exclude this possibility, two identical reactions
A and B (10 mol% each of PFTP and AIBN) were run
side by side and samples were withdrawn from both for
NMR analysis after 15 min. At the same time, the
isolable aryloxyl radical galvinoxyl (10 mol%) was
product must be minimised, by making addition of XS
to the CꢁC bonds highly reversible and/or retarded by
the steric bulk of the thiyl radical. Both reactions a and
c will be favoured for more electrophilic thiyl radicals
but, since the activation energy for a reaction cannot be
less than its endothermicity, the strength of the SꢀH
bond should be such that neither reaction is signifi-
cantly endothermic. Although reaction a will be very
rapid with alkane- or silane-thiols as catalysts, reaction
c (and reaction b) is likely to be appreciably endother-
mic and relatively slow, with the equilibrium favouring
the allylic radical. Because of the weaker SꢀH bond in
thiophenol, reaction c will be faster and this thiol is a
more efficient catalyst. The SꢀH bond in PFTP is likely
9
added to flask B. After 15 min heating, conversion of
3
to 4 was 48% in reaction A and 45% in reaction B,
while after 2.5 h heating conversion was complete in
reaction A but still only 45% in the inhibited reaction
B. These results strongly support a radical-chain mech-
anism for the isomerisation process.
After 2.5 h in refluxing benzene under the usual condi-
tions, using PFTP as catalyst and DLP as initiator, 90%
of the allyl silyl ether 5 was converted to silyl enol ether
1
0
6
with an E:Z ratio of 1:3.0. However, isomerisation
was complete in refluxing toluene with 1,1-di-tert-
butylperoxycyclohexane (DBPC, 10 mol%) as initiator
or in refluxing octane with 2,2-di-tert-butylperoxy-
butane (DBPB, 10 mol%) as initiator; the E:Z ratio was
12
to be stronger than that in thiophenol, leading to a
still more favourable balance between reactions a and c,
and the presence of the ring-fluorine atoms in PFTP
will also maximise favourable polar effects for the
abstraction of hydrogen by the especially electrophilic
XS
OSiR3
OSiR3
-anti
OSiR3
7-syn
thiyl radical C F S , to give the nucleophilic siloxyallyl
XSH
6 5
radical (reaction a), as well as for abstraction of hydro-
gen from the thiol by the latter radical (reaction c).
7
XS XSH
XS XSH
The secondary allyl silyl ether 8 underwent isomerisa-
tion somewhat less readily than the primary analogue 5.
Thus, in refluxing benzene with AIBN and PFTP (both
OSiR3
OSiR3
1
0 mol%), conversion was 77% after 2.5 h (9E:9Z=
13
E
Z
1:1.9), although the conversion was increased to 86%
when the AIBN was replaced by DLP (Scheme 5). In
refluxing toluene (DBPC initiator) or refluxing octane
Scheme 3.
a
b
c
D
D
D
XS
XSH
XS
d
Scheme 4.