Mahata et al.
Recently, there has been some effort to prepare MOFs
based on a reticular synthesis approach. Thus, designed
increase in the the reaction temperature, through an entropy-
driven dehydration pathway. It has been shown that
4
10
organic linkers have been employed as “struts” or bridges
to connect the metal centers, forming new compounds with
interesting adsorption properties. In spite of these develop-
compounds with extended -M-O-M- connectivity also
1
1
have higher thermal stability as well. A similar trend was
also observed by Kitagawa and co-workers during their study
5
1
2
ments, our understanding of the formation of such com-
pounds continues to be poor. One of the persistent issues
with respect to the synthesis of framework solids is that their
formation appears to be more kinetically driven rather than
based on thermodynamic control. Thus, it may be possible
to isolate many kinetically favored interesting new structures
enroute to the thermodynamically favored stable ones. Thus,
the trial and error approach appears to be more appealing
to study the formation of extended framework structures. In
light of this, it may be worth noting that a reactive
intermediate, based on a simple four-membered ring (zero-
dimensional), has been isolated in the family of zinc
phosphates and shown to be reactive, giving rise to structures
of the formation of cobalt pyridinedicarboxylates. Here a
two-dimensional hydrated structure at low temperature gives
way to a three-dimensional structure with infinite one-
dimensional -M-O-M- linkages at higher temperatures.
In a related study, the use of temperature and composition
as the variables gave rise to three different homochiral
1
3
cadmium camphorates. Postsynthesis modification studies
have been carried out, which also establishes the importance
of temperature in the control of dimensionality in nickel
14
diphosphonate structures. During the course of our studies
toward the understanding of the formation of structures with
extended networks, we have recently reported the role of
temperature in the formation of manganese oxybis(benzoate)
6
15
of higher dimensionality. Studies of this nature are not many
structures. In a continuation of this theme, we have taken
on the MOF compounds because the focus appears to be
more on understanding the role of organic ligands such as
carboxylates, amines, etc. Intense research activity over the
up the study of manganese-based MOF compounds prepared
using two different aromatic poly(carboxylic acids), 4,4′-
oxybis(benzoic acid) (OBA), and trimellitic acid (1,2,4-
benzenetricarboxylic acid, BTC). In this paper, we present
a brief overview of the role of time and temperature of
reaction in the formation of MOFs along with our findings
on the manganese benzenecarboxylate phases.
7
years, however, has provided examples of MOFs with more
than two structures formed with the same combination of
8
metal and organic ligands.
Mechanistic studies, especially on the formation of solids
with extended structures, are difficult to perform because of
the large number of variables involved in the synthesis.
Systematic studies on the role of simple variables such as
the temperature and time of the reaction can be investigated,
Experimental Section
Materials. The reagents needed for the synthesis of the
compounds are Mn(OAC)
9%], 4,4′-oxybis(benzoic acid), 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid
Lancaster (Lancaster, U.K.), 99%], imidazole [Ranbaxy (Gurgaon,
2
·4H
2
O [Ranbaxy (Gurgaon, India),
8b,9
9
although such studies are rare.
One of the emerging trends
[
in the area of MOFs appears to be the study of the possible
competition between the thermodynamic and kinetic factors
in the formation of such structures. There have been some
studies toward this direction, which indicates that in some
cases the thermodynamic considerations appear to be more
important than the kinetic ones. Cheetham and co-workers
provided the first insight on the influence of the reaction
temperature during the formation of cobalt succinate phases,
which indicated the formation of denser higher dimensional
structures with extended -M-O-M- connectivity upon an
India), 99%], and KOH [CDH (New Delhi, India), 99%]. The water
used was double distilled through a Millipore membrane.
(
a) Synthesis of Mn-OBA Compounds. A typical reaction
mixture containing Mn(OAc) ·4H O (0.245 g, 1 mM), 4,4′-
oxybis(benzoic) acid (OBA) (0.26 g, 1 mM), imidazole (0.068 g,
mM), and KOH (0.11 g, 2 mM) and 8 mL of water was heated
2
2
1
in a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE)-lined stainless steel autoclave
at different times (1-5 days) and temperatures (75-220 °C) under
autogenous pressure. The synthesis conditions and other related
parameters are summarized in Table 1. The synthesis efforts resulted
in a total of six different phases identified by single-crystal X-ray
diffraction (XRD). The products of the synthesis were initially
characterized by powder XRD studies, which indicated that in some
of the preparations mixed-phase products are obtained. In most of
the cases, we observed a reasonable yield for the products, which
are typically in the range of 70-75% based on Mn.
(
4) (a) Ferey, G. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 191. (b) Rosi, N. L.; Eddaoudi,
M.; Kim, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. CrystEngComm 2002, 4,
4
01.
(
5) (a) Yaghi, O. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.;
Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J. Nature 2003, 423, 705. (b) Eddaoudi, M.; Kim,
J.; Rosi, N.; Vodak, D.; Wachter, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M.
Science 2002, 295, 469. (c) Devic, T.; David, O.; Valls, M.; Marrot,
J.; Couty, F.; Ferey, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12614.
(b) Synthesis of Mn-1,2,4-BTC Compounds. A typical reaction
mixture containing Mn(OAc)
2
2
·4H O (0.245 g, 1 mM), 1,2,4-
(
6) (a) Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Choudhury, A.; Neeraj, S.; Ayi, A. A.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 80. (b) Ayi, A. A.; Choudhury, A.;
Natarajan, S.; Neeraj, S.; Rao, C. N. R. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11,
benzenetricarboxlic acid (0.21 g, 1 mM), imidazole (0.068 g, 1
1
181. (c) Natarajan, S.; Wullen, L. V.; Klein, W.; Jansen, M. Inorg.
(10) (a) Forster, P. M.; Burbank, A. R.; Livage, C.; Ferey, G.; Cheetham,
A. K. Chem. Commun. 2004, 368. (b) Forster, P. M.; Stock, N.;
Cheetham, A. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7608.
(11) Forster, P. M.; Cheetham, A. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
457.
(12) Tong, M. L.; Kitagawa, S.; Chang, H. C.; Ohba, M. Chem. Commun.
2004, 418.
Chem. 2003, 42, 6265.
(
(
7) Chesnut, D. J.; Hagrman, D.; Zapf, P. J.; Hammond, R. P.; Laduca,
R., Jr.; Haushalter, R. C.; Zubieta, J. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 190,
7
37.
8) (a) Rao, C. N. R.; Natarajan, S.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1466. (b) Wang, X. L.; Qin, C.; Wang, E. B.; Li,
Y. G.; Su, Z. M.; Xu, L.; Carlucci, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
(13) Zhang, J.; Bu, X. Chem. Commun. 2008, 444.
(14) Gao, Q. M.; Guillou, N.; Nogues, M.; Ferey, G.; Cheetham, A. K.
Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 2937.
4
4, 5824.
9) Cheetham, A. K.; Rao, C. N. R.; Feller, R. K. Chem. Commun. 2006,
780.
(
4
(15) Mahata, P.; Sundaresan, A.; Natarajan, S. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4471.
8452 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 47, No. 19, 2008