200
VASHURIN et al.
–
4
–1
trations of Co phthalocyanine). As follows from these
kapp × 10 , s
2
data, phthalocyanines I and II fixed to the polymer supꢀ
port are quite effective catalysts over a wide concentraꢀ
tion range.
8
6
4
2
For the heterogeneous catalyst based on II, its activꢀ
ity in a series of successive experiments was investigated.
Figure 4 shows the change in the apparent rate constant
for the oxidation of DTC, depending on the number of
oxidation cycles.
Despite a slight decrease in kapp for the oxidation of
diethyldithiocarbamate, it can be stated that tetraꢀ4ꢀ
1
[
(6',8'ꢀdisulfoꢀ2ꢀnaphthyl)oxy]phthalocyanine
(II)
immobilized on PMMA is an efficient catalyst for oxiꢀ
dation of RSH compounds with atmospheric oxygen in
alkaline solutions.
REFERENCES
0
–4
1
2
3
4
5
с × 10 , mol/L
1
. V. N. Nemykin, A. E. Polshyna, S. A. Borisenkova, and
V. V. Strelko, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 264, 103 (2007).
. D. L. Burdick and W. L. Leffler, Petrochemicals in Nonꢀ
technical Language (Penn Well, Tulsa, 1990).
. A. Kh. Sharipov, Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel, No. 4, 4
Fig. 3. Dependence of the apparent rate constant for the
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
oxidation of DTC on the concentration of the macrocycle
(1) phthalocyanine I or (2) phthalocyanine II in the solution
for deposition onto the polymer.
(1994).
. A. M. Mazgarov and A. F. Vil’danov, Pet. Chem. 39, 336
(1999).
–
4
–1
kapp
×
10 , s
. S. A. Borisenkova, A. F. Vil’danov, and A. M. Mazgarov,
Ross. Khim. Zh. 39 (5), 87 (1995).
. A. M. Mazgarov, A. F. Vil’danov, and S. N. Sukhov,
Khim. Tekhnol. Topl. Masel 40 (6), 11 (1996).
. V. Iliev, V. Alexiev, and L. Bilyarska, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 137, 15 (1999).
. V. I. Iliev, A. I. Ileva, and L. D. Dimitrov, Appl. Catal. A:
Gen. 126, 333 (1995).
9. V. Iliev, A. Mihaylova, and L. Bilyarska, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 184, 121 (2002).
10. A. G. Gonzalez and M. A. Herradon, Anal. Chim. Acta
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
.6
.4
.2
.0
.8
.6
.4
.2
.0
356, 253 (1997).
1
1
1
1
1
1. N. Sh. Lebedeva, N. A. Pavlycheva, O. V. Petrova, et al.,
Mendeleev Commun., No. 5, 237 (2003).
2. N. Sh. Lebedeva, O. V. Petrova, A. I. V’yugin, et al., Opt.
Spectrosc. 94, 924 (2003).
3. V. P. Kulinich, G. P. Shaposhnikov, and R. A. Badauꢀ
kaite, Macroheterocycles 3 (1), 23 (2010).
4. Yu. V. Karyakin and I. I. Angelov, Reagent Grade Chemiꢀ
cals (Khimiya, Moscow, 1974) [in Russian].
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Cycle no.
Fig. 4. Dependence of the apparent rate constant for the
oxidation of DTC in the presence of copolymerꢀimmobiꢀ
lized complex II on the number of cycles.
5. A. Weissberger, E. S. Proskauer, J. A. Riddick, and
E. E. Toops, Organic Solvents: Physical Properties and
Methods of Purification (Interscience, New York, 1955).
6. T. A. Anan’eva, T. F. Titova, and V. F. Borodkin, Izv.
Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. 22, 37
1
The cause of the increase in the catalyst activity by
(
1979).
7. A. S. Vashurin, S. G. Pukhovskaya, A. S. Semeikin, and
O. A. Golubchikov, Macroheterocycles (1), 72 (2012).
immobilization is a change of its associative state,
namely, an increase in the concentration of the monoꢀ
mer form. The data presented in Fig. 2 show that most
of II occur in the associated state in the solution
1
1
5
8. V. S. Strizhko, D. V. Shekhirev, R. E. Flimova, and
D. V. Abryutin, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Tsvetn.
Met., No. 2, 5 (2000).
(
curve
2), whereas the immobilized catalyst is monoꢀ
1
9. I. V. Pimkov, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim.
Tekhnol. 50 (6), 111 (2007).
0. V. E. Maizlish and G. P. Shaposhnikov, Advances in Porꢀ
phyrin Chemistry, Ed. by O. A. Golubchikov (VVM,
St. Petersburg, 2004), vol. 4, p. 327 [in Russian].
meric (curve
1).
Figure 3 shows estimates of the catalytic efficiency
of DTC oxidation, depending on the amount of the catꢀ
alyst (deposited from solutions with different concenꢀ
2
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY Vol. 53
No. 3
2013