Med Chem Res
´
˚
C18H11Cl2N3O2, Required: C (58.08 %) H (2.98 %) N
(11.29 %) Found: C (58.06 %) H (2.95 %) N (11.27 %).
and the grid center was set to 30.59, 15.822 A, and -3.497
for x, y, and z, respectively, which covered all the 12 amino
acid residues in the considered active pocket. Docking soft-
ware AutoDock 4.2 Program supplied with AutoGrid 4.0 and
AutoDock 4.0 was used to produce grid maps. The spacing
1-(5,7-Dichloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-3-(4-bromophe-
nyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde (6d) IR (KBr) cm-1
:
´
1,692 (HC=O), 1,445 (C=C), 767 (C–Cl); 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6) ppm: d 7.75 (d, 2H, Ar H,), d 7.99 (d, 2H, Ar
H,), d 7.5 (s, 1H, Ar H), d 8.1 (s, 1H, Ar H), d 9.56 (s, 1H,
pyrazole =CH), d 10.05 (s, 1H, –CHO), 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6): d 110–159.3.0 (16C, sp2 carbon atoms), 187 (CHO), m/
between grid points was 0.375 A. The Lamarckian Genetic
˚
Algorithm (LGA) was chosen to search for the best con-
formers. During the docking process, a maximum of 10
conformers was considered for each compound. All the
AutoDock docking runs were performed in Intel Centrino
Core2Duo CPU @ 2.20 GHz of IBM system origin with
2 GB DDR2 RAM. AutoDock 4.0 was compiled and run
under Windows XP operating system.
z
437.07, M?2 439.08, M?4 441: Analyses
C17H8BrCl2N3O2, Required: C (46.72 %) H (1.84 %) N
(9.61 %) Found: C (46.70 %) H (1.83 %) N (9.60 %).
1-(5,7-Dichloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-3-(3,4-dichloro-
phenyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehyde (6e) IR (KBr)
Conclusion
1
cm-1: 1,695 (HC=O), 1,461 (C=C), 767 (C–Cl); H NMR
(DMSO-d6) ppm: d 7.59 (d, 2H, Ar H), d 7.77 (s, 1H, Ar
H), d 7.84 (s, 1H, Ar H), d 7.98 (s, 1H, Ar H), d 9.57 (s, 1H,
pyrazole =CH), d 9.96 (s, 1H, –CHO),13C NMR (DMSO-
d6): d 113–160.5.0 (16C, sp2 carbon atoms), d 187 (CHO),
m/z 427.06, M?2 429, M?4 431, M?6 433, Analyses:
C17H7Cl4N3O2, Required: C (47.81 %) H (1.65 %) N
(9.84 %) Found: C (47.80 %) H (1.64 %) N (9.83 %).
This study reports the successful synthesis of the title
compounds in good yield and characterized by IR, 1H
NMR, 13C NMR, and Mass spectral analysis. The data
reported here clearly indicated that the synthesized com-
pounds have shown considerable antimicrobial activity.
Among the compounds, 6b and 6d were emerged as
potentially active antimicrobial as well as analgesic agents.
In molecular docking studies, compound 6b showed min-
imum binding energy. The compounds with minimum
binding energy are responsible for more active antimicro-
bial agent with respect to standard drugs. The best dock
conformation is one with least binding energy has the
highest affinity.
Molecular docking studies
The ligands were drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 6.0 (Chem
Office package) assigned with proper 2D orientation and the
structure of each compound was analyzed for connection
error in bond order. OSIRIS, an ADMET-based Java library
layer that provides reusable cheminformatics functionality, is
an entirely in-house-developed drug discovery informatics
system used to predict the total drug score via in silico (Bates
et al., 1966). Energy of the molecules was minimized using
Dundee PRODRG2 server (Chamara and Borowski, 1986).
The energy-minimized compounds were then read as input
for Auto Dock 4.2 to carry out the docking simulation
(Milewski et al., 1986). All heteroatoms were removed from
the 2VF5 pdb to make complex receptor free of any ligand
before docking. The Graphical User Interface program
‘‘Auto Dock Tools’’ was used to prepare, run, and analyze the
docking simulations. Kollman united atom charges, salvation
parameters, and polar hydrogens were added to the receptor
for the preparation of protein in docking simulations. In the
present study, the binding site was selected based on the
amino acid residues, which were involved in binding with
glucosamine-6-phosphate of GlcN-6-P synthase as obtained
from PDB with ID 2VF5. Therefore, the grid was centered at
the region including all the 12 amino acid residues (Ala602,
Val399, Ala400, Gly301, Thr302, Ser303, Cys300, Gln348,
Ser349, Thr352, Ser347, and Lys603) that surround active
Acknowledgments The author (N.D.J) is grateful to UGC for
providing Rajiv Gandhi Research Fellowship. The authors are
thankful to Director, IISc, Bangalore, for providing spectral data and
thankful to the Principal, Sahyadri Science College, Shimoga, for
providing laboratory facilities to carry out research work.
References
Bates CJ, Adams WR, Handschumacher RE (1966) Control of the
formation of uridine diphospho-N-acetyl-hexosamine and gly-
coprotein synthesis in rat liver. J Biol Chem 241:1705–1712
Bratenko MK, Vovk MV, Sydorchuk IJ (1999).Synthesis and
antibacterial and antifungal activity of hydrazones and azines
of 1-phenyl-3-R-4-formylpyrazole. Farm Zh 68–71
Bratenko MK, Kadel’nik Yu V, Chornous VA, Vovk Russ MV (2008)
4-Functionally-substituted 3-heterylpyrazoles.
44:247–250
J Org Chem
Chamara H, Borowski E (1986) Bacteriolytic effect of cessation of
glucosamine supply, induced by specific inhibition of glucosa-
mine 6-phosphate synthetase. Acta Microbiol Pol 35:15–27
Chamara H, Andruszkiewicz R, Borowski E (1985) Inactivation of
glucosamine-6-phosphate synthetase from Salmonella typhimuri-
um LT2 by fumaroyl diaminopropanoic acid derivatives, a novel
group of glutamine analogs. Biochim Biophys Acta 870:357–366
´
˚
site as in Fig. 2. The grid box size was set at 70, 64, and 56 A
123