Notes
Journal of Natural Products, 2005, Vol. 68, No. 9 1399
anisaldehyde/H2SO4. Solid-phase extraction was done on Am-
berchrom CG-161C (TOSOHAAS); TLC was performed on DC
Alugram SIL G/UV 254 (0,25 mm, Macherey-Nagel GmbH&Co,
Germany), and staining reagents were prepared according to
standard laboratory procedures. Staining was achieved through
spraying onto the plate and subsequent heating. Chromatog-
raphy was done on LiChroprep RP-18 (25-40 µm, Merck
KGaA, Germany), Sephadex LH-20 (Pharmacia Biotech AB,
Sweden), and silica gel 60 (0.040-0.063 mm, Merck KgaA,
Germany). All solvents were of gas-distilled grade.
Microorganism and Fermentation. The strain of Peni-
cillium janczewskii Zalessky (strain KMPB H-TW5/869) was
isolated from surface water collected during a research cruise
in 1995 from the German Bight (North Sea) northeast of the
island Helgoland (54°22′0′′ N, 8°16′0′′ E). The fungus was
maintained on agar slants before the identification according
to the protocol of Pitt.4,5 The isolate was deposited as DSM17433
at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkul-
turen GmbH (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Inocculum
was prepared from agar slants. After 7 days of cultivation at
25 °C spores and mycelium were cut by a cork borer and used
for inocculating the culture broth. The large-scale fermentation
was performed in resting cultures in Fernbach flasks in a total
volume of 50 L in glucose/potato extract broth.4 Screening
cultures were run in 200 mL of culture media in Erlenmeyer
flasks. The cultures were incubated at 25 °C for 29 days.
Screening Extracts. Cultures were separated by filtration.
The lyophilized mycelium was extracted with 50 mL of
methanol. The suspension was sonicated for 6 min, and
extraction was performed for 3 h. The solvent of the separated
extract was removed in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved
in 1 mL of methanol and stored at -20 °C in microplates.
Samples of the culture filtrate were prepared by solid-phase
extraction on Amberchrom 161c (Supelco).11
Downstream Processing and Purification. After up-
scale cultivation, biomass and culture liquid were separated
by filtration through cheesecloths. Biomass was lyophilized to
give 312 g of dried mycelia. The culture broth was adsorbed
on a Amberchrom CG 161c column, washed with distilled
water, and eluted with methanol. The methanolic extract was
evaporated in vacuo to give 14 g of crude extract. The
lyophilized culture filtrate was separated by flash chromatog-
raphy (RP18, MeOH/H2O, gradient) to obtain fractions 1 to 4.
Fraction 4 was purified using Sephadex LH-20 (3 × 80 cm,
MeOH) combined with repeated column chromatography
(CHCl3/MeOH, gradient) on silica gel to yield compound 3 (15
mg), compound 4 (20 mg), and a mixture of 1 and 2 The latter
was further purified by preparative HPLC (RP18, MeOH/H2O
gradient from 25/75 to 45/55 in 110 min) to obtain 1 (2 mg,
tR,1 ) 45 min) and 2 (3 mg, tR,2 ) 55 min).
Cytotoxicity Testing. The cytotoxic activities of methan-
olic extracts and pure compounds were determined in a
sulforhodamine B (SRB) staining assay (Sigma, Schnelldorf,
Germany). For a typical experiment, cells were inoculated in
96-well microtiter plates in amounts of 90 µL at plating
densities ranging from 5000 to 10 000 cells/well depending on
the doubling time of individual cell lines. After cell inoculation,
the microtiter plates were incubated for 24 h prior to addition
of the screening extracts or compounds. Extracts (50% MeOH)
or compounds solubilized in 100% MeOH or dimethyl sulfoxide
were stored frozen prior to use. The final test concentration
for pure compounds of 1 µg/test well (100 µL) with complete
medium corresponds to a micromolar test range. Following
extract or compound addition, the plates were incubated for
an additional 48 h, then washed with PBS. The assay was
terminated by fixing of the cells with cold trichloroacetic acid
solution (TCA) for 30 min on ice (final concentration: adherent
cells 10% TCA; suspension cells 16% TCA). The supernatant
was discarded, and the plates were washed five times with
tap water and air-dried. SRB solution (100 µL) at 0.4% (w/v)
in 1% acetic acid was added to each well, and plates were
incubated for 10 min at room temperature. After staining,
unbound dye was removed by washing five times with 1%
acetic acid and the plates were air-dried. Bound stain was
subsequently solubilized in 10 mM Tris/KOH (pH 10.5), and
the absorbance was read at 550 nm.
3S*,4R*-Dihydroxy-4-(4′-methoxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-
2(1H)-quinolinone (1): white solid; [R]15 -12.9° (c 0.7,
D
1
MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3300, 1705, 1684, 1604, 1511 cm-1; H
and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HMBC correlations (DMSO-
d6) NH-1/C-2, NH-1/C-3, NH-1/C-4a, NH-1/C-8, NH-1/C-8a,
H-3/C-2, H-3/C-4, H-3/C-4a, H-3/C-1′, OH-3/C-1′, OH-3/C-3,
OH-3/C-4, OH-4/C-3, OH-4/C-4, OH-4/C-4a, OH-4/C-1′, H-5/
C-4, H-5/C-8a, H-6/C-5, H-6/C-7, H-6/C-8, H-6/C-4a, H-6/C-8a,
H-7/C-6, H-7/C-8a, H-7/C-8, H-8/C-4, H-8/C-6, H-8/C-4a, H-8/
C-8a, H2′(6′)/C-4, H2′(6′)/C-3′(5′), H2′(6′)/C-4′, H3′(5′)/C-1′, H3′-
(5′)/C-4′, OCH3/C-4′; ESIMS m/z 308.1 [M + Na]+, 285.9 [M +
H]+, 593.2 [2M + Na]+.
3R*,4R*-Dihydroxy-4-(4′-methoxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-
2(1H)-quinolinone (2): white solid; [R]15 -4.2° (c 0.5,
D
1
MeOH); IR (KBr) νmax 3200, 1710, 1678, 1612, 1511 cm-1; H
and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; ESIMS m/z 308.1 (M + Na)+,
593.5 [2M + Na]+; HRESIMS m/z 308.0911 [M + Na]+ (calcd
for C16H15NO4Na, 308.0899).
Acidic Dehydration of 1 and 2. To a solution of 1 and 2
(1:1, 3 mg) in acetone (2 mL) TsOH was added (0.5 mg), and
the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. After
solvent evaporation, the residue was purified by silica gel
column chromatography (P.E./EtOAc, 4:1) to give compound
5 (1 mg).
3-Hydroxy-4-(4′-methoxyphenyl)-2(1H)-quinolinone, 5:
white solid; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.31 (1H, brs, NH),
7.33 (1H, d, J ) 7.6 Hz), 7.25 (1H, m), 7.11 (2H, d, J ) 9.0
Hz), 7.07 (1H, t, J ) 7.4 Hz), 6.85 (1H, d, J ) 7.9 Hz), 6.80
(2H, d, J ) 9.0 Hz), 4.35 (1H, s, OH), 3.75 (3H, s, OCH3);
ESIMS m/z 268.1 [M + H].
Acknowledgment. We thank B. Lehmann, I. Perner, F.
Rhein, B. Ritzka, K. Scheer, S. Grimm, and S. Hauck for
excellent technical assistance, and Drs. X. Huang and E.
Roemer for valuable suggestions. This collaboration project
was funded by grants from the German Federal Ministry for
Education and Research (03F0227 and CHN 98/306).
References and Notes
(1) Andersen, R. J.; Ireland, C. M.; Molinski, T. F.; Bewley, C. A. J. Nat.
Prod. 2004, 6, 1239-51.
(2) Bugni T. S.; Ireland, C. M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 143-163.
(3) Grabley, S.; Thiericke, R. Drug Discovery from Nature; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, 1999; pp 124-148.
(4) Pitt, J. I. The Genus Penicillium and Its Teleomorphic States
Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. Academic Press: London, 1979.
(5) Pitt, J. I. A Guide to Common Penicillium Species; Lubrecht & Cramer
Ltd., 1988.
(6) Hayashi, H.; Nakatani, T.; Inoue, Y.; Nozaki, H. Biosci. Biotech.
Biochem. 1997, 61, 914-916.
(7) Kusano, M.; Koshino, H.; Uzawa, J. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 2000,
64, 2559-2568.
(8) Schmeda-Hirschmann, G.; Hormazabal, E.; Astudillo, L.; Rodriguez,
J.; Theoduloz, C. World J. Microbiol. Biotech. 2005, 21, 27-32.
(9) Mohammmed, Y. S.; Gohar, A. N.; Abdel-Latif, F. F.; Badr, M. Z. A.
Pharmazie 1985, 40, 312-4.
(10) Masoud, M. S.; Mohammed, Y. S.; Abdel-Latif, F. F.; Soliman, E. M.
A. Spectroscopy Lett. 1988, 21, 369-83.
(11) Schmid, I.; Sattler, I.; Grabley, S.; Thiericke, R. J. Biomol. Screening
1999, 4, 13-23.
NP058018G