D. Liu et al.
Journal of Solid State Chemistry 301 (2021) 122309
Fig. 2. a XRD patterns of Ag3PO4, Bi2GeO5, 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4, 0.2Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4, and 0.3Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4; b XRD patterns of fresh 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4, after 1
and after 4 cycles.
The free radical capture experiments were performed to analyze the
active substances present in degrading pollutants. During free radical
capture experiments, 50 mg catalyst with IPA (0.1 mL) or TEOA (0.2487
mL) or BQ (0.1802 g) was dispersed in a test tube containing 50 mL of 10
mg/L RhB before visible light irradiation. To this end, isopropanol (IPA)
was employed as a hydroxyl radical (OH⋅) capture agent, triethanolamine
(TEOA) as a hole (hþ) capture agent, and p-benzoquinone (BQ) as a su-
peroxide anion (O- 2⋅) capture agent.
determined as 0.309 and 0.3002 nm and corresponded to (311) and
(200) crystal planes of Bi2GeO5 and Ag3PO4, respectively. The SAED
results of 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 are displayed in Fig. 3g. The bright
diffraction rings of 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 indicated its polycrystalline
features. The lattice spacings of the two crystal planes were determined
as 0.309 and 0.3002 nm, respectively (Fig. 3g). These results were
consistent with those of HRTEM.
In EDX diagram of 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 (Fig. 3h), the elements Bi, Ge,
O, Ag, and P were detected. The apparent diffraction peak of Cu was
generated by Cu mesh used to prepare the samples for TEM testing. The
SEM image and corresponding element mappings of Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 are
gathered in Fig. 4. The elements Bi, Ge, O, Ag and P looked homoge-
neously dispersed on 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 surface. In summary, Bi2GeO5
was well-dispersed and supported on Ag3PO4 crystal surface as granular,
forming relatively uniform spherical nanocomposites.
The surface chemical states of Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 were studied by XPS
in Fig. 5. The full-spectrum of fresh Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 composite is pre-
sented in Fig. 5a. A total of six elements (Bi, Ge, O, Ag, P and C, where C is
the substrate) were recorded, indicating the coexistence of both Ag3PO4
and Bi2GeO5. For Ag 3d XPS peaks of 0.1 Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 (Fig. 5b), the
Ag 3d spectra of fresh 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 at 367.75 eV and 373.8 eV
corresponded to Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2, respectively. Hence, Ag mainly
existed as Agþ in 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 photocatalyst [33]. After the first
cycle, Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 displayed peaks at 368.1 eV and 374.1 eV,
respectively. From Fig. 5b, the Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 can be divided into
four different peaks, which are 368 eV, 368.5 eV, 374 eV and 374.6 eV.
The peak at 368.5 eV and 374.6 eV were assigned to Ag0, and the peaks at
368 eV and 374 eV were attributed to Agþ [34]. Therefore, small
amounts of Agþ converted into metal Ag during photocatalysis, consis-
tent with the XRD results. The XPS analysis of P 2p is shown in Fig. 5c,
and it represents P5þ in the PO43þ structure at 131.7eV. After single
photocatalysis, the P 2p XPS spectral intensity further decreased, con-
firming the formation of the silver element [26]. In XPS peaks of O 1s
(Fig. 5d), the O 1s XPS spectrum of fresh 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 was
composed of three multi-state peaks attributed to 530.62 eV, 531.27 eV,
and 532.2 eV. The peaks at 530.62 eV and 531.27 eV corresponded to
Ag3PO4 and Bi2GeO5 lattices in the material, respectively. The peak at
532.2 eV confirmed the adsorption of H2O or OHꢀ on the surface [35].
The Bi 4f XPS analyses of fresh 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 are provided in
Fig. 5e. Bi 4f was well-fitted with two main peaks at 159.53 eV and
164.85 eV, corresponding to Bi 4f7/2 and Bi 4f5/2, respectively. Hence, Bi
was present in the oxidation state of Bi3þ. The Ge 3d XPS peak of fresh
0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 is displayed in Fig. 5f. The peak corresponding to
29.5 eV belonged to [GeO3]2-(Ge4þ) [10]. Thus, Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4
transformed into Bi2GeO5/Ag@Ag3PO4 during photocatalysis.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalyst characterization
The XRD spectra of the as-synthesized Bi2GeO5, Ag3PO4, 0.1Bi2GeO5/
Ag3PO4, 0.2Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4, and 0.3Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 catalysts are
shown in Fig. 2a. For Bi2GeO5, characteristic diffraction peaks were
observed at 11.3ꢁ, 23.8ꢁ, 28.8ꢁ, 33.3ꢁ, 36.96ꢁ, 47.3ꢁ and 58.2ꢁ, consistent
with JCPDS No. 78-1334 standards of (200), (111), (311), (002), (511),
(022) and (802) crystal planes, respectively. According to Ag3PO4
(JCPDS No. 70-0702), the characteristic diffraction peaks of Bi2GeO5/
Ag3PO4 catalysts at 20.9ꢁ, 29.7ꢁ, 33.3ꢁ, 36.6ꢁ, 47.9ꢁ, 52.8ꢁ, 55.1ꢁ, 57.4ꢁ,
61.7ꢁ and 72ꢁ corresponded to (110), (200), (210), (211), (310), (222),
(320), (321), (400) and (421) crystal planes of cubic crystal of Ag3PO4,
respectively. Also, the peaks belonging to Bi2GeO5 in XRD profile of
Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 became increasingly obvious as Bi2GeO5 amount rose.
The crystal sizes of Bi2GeO5 and Ag3PO4 were calculated by using Debye
Scherer's Equation in Jade software. The crystal size of Bi2GeO5 and
Ag3PO4 are about 230 nm and 643 nm, respectively.
The XRD spectrum of 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 is displayed in Fig. 2b.
Changes were noticed after 1 and 4 cycles. The diffraction peaks of the
photocatalysts at 38.2ꢁ, 64.6ꢁ and 77.6ꢁcorresponded to Ag characteristic
peaks of (111), (220), and (311) crystal planes (JCPDS No. 87-0718),
respectively. The crystal structures of Bi2GeO5 and Ag3PO4 were also
preserved.
The SEM, TEM, HRTEM, SAED, and EDX images of Ag3PO4, Bi2GeO5,
and 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 catalysts are provided in Fig. 3. Note that Fig. 3a
and b represent SEM images of pure Bi2GeO5 sample with microflowers.
The morphology mainly contained layered microflowers (diameters
0.2–0.5
hexahedral structure of Ag3PO4 crystals showed particle sizes ranging
from 0.5 to 1 m (Fig. 3c). The SEM image of 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 after
μm) agglomerated by two-dimensional nanosheets. The regular
μ
composite formation is displayed in Fig. 3d. Bi2GeO5 particles were
deposited on Ag3PO4 surface to yield relatively uniform spherical
nanocomposites. In TEM image of 0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 (Fig. 3e), Bi2GeO5
nanoparticles were attached to Ag3PO4 surface. In HRTEM images of
0.1Bi2GeO5/Ag3PO4 (Fig. 3f), the spacings of lattice fringe were
3