4554
C. Phung, A. R. Pinhas / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4552–4554
being the major isomer 4. In contrast, when the temperature of the
reaction is increased from room temperature to 45 °C, the regiose-
lectivity decreases to less than 80% of the major isomer.
before the CO2 was added. For the reaction with added water,
0.25 mL of water was added to the THF solution before the CO2
was added. For the catalytic reaction, only 9.0 mg (0.060 mmol)
NH4I was used.
2.6. Catalytic NH4I
After the reaction was completed, the THF solution was added
to 50 mL of diethyl ether. The ether solution was washed once with
20 mL of 10% sodium bisulfate and twice with 20 mL of water. The
ether then was dried with anhydrous K2CO3 and evaporated to dry-
ness, yielding the oxazolidinone mixture. As done previously, GC–
MS and 1H NMR spectroscopy were used to analyze the reaction
mixture.10
Rather than using a stoichiometric amount of NH4I, this reaction
also can be performed using a catalytic amount of NH4I (Table 2,
entries 13 and 14). However, when catalytic NH4I (5 mol %) is used
for the reaction of 3 + CO2, the product formation occurs much
more slowly (53% yield vs, 97% yield in 40 min). When this cata-
lytic reaction is allowed to proceed for 2 h, the yield increases to
98%, with 91% of the mass as isomer 4.
Acknowledgments
2.7. Maximization of isomer 4
The authors thank Professor David Smithrud and the reviewers
for many helpful suggestions. A.R.P. thanks the faculty and staff of
the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and the Depart-
ment of Chemistry of the University of Louisville for their hospi-
Thus as shown in Table 2, using NH4I as the catalyst and THF as
the solvent, unactivated 2-alkylaziridine 3 will undergo insertion
of CO2 into the less substituted C–N bond to give isomer 4 in high
yield (over 95%), in high regioselectivity (over 95%), at low pressure
(3 or 4 atm), at low temperature (room temperature or below), and
in a short time (40 min at rt or 4 h at 0 °C).
tality during
written.
a sabbatical leave when this manuscript was
References and notes
1. Zappia, G.; Gacs-Baitz, E.; Monache, G. D.; Misiti, D.; Nevola, L.; Botta, B. Curr.
Org. Synth. 2007, 81.
2.8. Maximization of isomer 5
2. Watson, I. D. G.; Yu, L.; Yudin, A. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 194.
3. Hu, X. E. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2701.
For turning around the results in the previous section, larger
amounts of insertion into the more substituted C–N bond to give
isomer 5 should be obtained with LiI, at lower pressure, higher
temperature, and longer reaction time. When the reaction of com-
pound 3 with CO2 was run in THF with LiI, at 1 atm CO2, at 55 °C,
for 3 days, only 33% of the oxazolidinone was isomer 4 and 67%
was what was formerly minor isomer 5. Unfortunately, the yield
was only 70%, because at the higher temperature, a large amount
of piperazine (a six-membered ring dimer of an aziridine) was
formed.
4. Sakakura, T.; Choi, J.-C.; Yasuda, H. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2365.
5. Arakawa, H.; Aresta, M.; Armor, J. N.; Barteau, M. A.; Beckman, E. J.; Bell, A. T.;
Bercaw, J. E.; Creutz, C.; Dinjus, E.; Dixon, D. A.; Domen, K.; DuBois, D. L.; Eckert,
J.; Fujita, E.; Gibson, D. H.; Goddard, W. A.; Goodman, D. W.; Keller, J.; Kubas, G.
J.; Kung, H. H.; Lyons, J. E.; Manzer, L. E.; Marks, T. J.; Morokuma, K.; Nicholas, K.
M.; Periana, R.; Que, L.; Rostrup-Nielson, J.; Sachtler, W. M. H.; Schmidt, L. D.;
Sen, A.; Somorjai, G. A.; Stair, P. C.; Stults, B. R.; Tumas, W. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101,
953.
6. Wu, Y.; He, L.-N.; Du, Y.; Wang, J.-Q.; Miao, C.-X.; Li, W. Tetrahedron 2009, 65,
6204.
7. He, L.; Du, Y.; Miao, C.; Wang, J.; Dou, X.; Wu, Y. Front. Chem. Eng. China 2009, 3,
224.
8. Du, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, A.-H.; He, L.-N. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4709.
9. Jiang, H.-F.; Ye, J.-W.; Qi, C.-R.; Huang, L.-B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 928.
10. Hancock, M. T.; Pinhas, A. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5457.
11. After Ref.10 was accepted for publication but before it was printed, a very
similar manuscript was accepted: Sudo, A.; Morioka, Y.; Koizumi, E.; Sanda, F.;
Endo, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7889.
12. Mu, W.-H.; Chasse, G. A.; Fang, D.-C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 6708.
13. O’Rourke, C. E.; Clapp, L. B.; Edwards, J. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 2159.
14. See: Catak, S.; D’hooghe, M.; De Kimpe, N.; Waroquier, M.; Van Speybroeck, V. J.
Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 885. and references cited therein.
3. Experimental section
Into a 48 mL thick walled flask, with a stir bar, was added aziri-
dine 3 (0.180 g, 1.22 mmol), 1.22 mmol of salt (LiI, 0.162 g; LiBr,
0.106 g; LiCl, 0.052 g; NaI, 0.184 g; NaBr, 0.126 g; NaCl, 0.071 g;
KI, 0.203 g; KBr, 0.146 g; KCl, 0.091 g; NH4I, 0.177 g; NH4Br,
0.120 g; or NH4Cl, 0.066 g), and 2 mL of THF. The reaction mixture
was then subjected to carbon dioxide gas at room temperature for
the appropriate length of time. The pressure was monitored by a
gauge and adjusted to 1, 3, or 4 atm by bleeding off excess pressure
at the beginning of the reaction. For the 45 °C reaction and for the
0 °C reaction, the flask was put into an oil bath or an ice/water bath
15. One reviewer suggested a control experiment using KI and a catalytic amount
of CF3COOH. When this was tried, the results were the same as the reaction
+
using only KI, and thus, the NH4 IÀ is not simply a proton source. The second
+
reviewer suggested an alternative mechanism in which instead of the NH4
reacting with the aziridine, it is coordinating with the CO2. The coordinated
CO2 and the IÀ then react with the aziridine ring.