approach, chiral Brønsted acid catalysis by a combined
Brønsted acid system, in which additional Brønsted acid
can facilitate proton transfer to silylated chiral Brønsted
acid (Scheme 1a) that is NOT the conventional mode
previously reported for silicon nucleophiles (Scheme 1b).6
acid 1b in toluene and ethyl acetate (entries 6 and 7). In
both cases, the reactions afforded higher enantioselectivity
that was observed when the reaction was conducted with
20 mol % of 1b in toluene (entry 2 vs 6) or in ethyl acetate
(entry 3 vs 7). This outcome suggested that (i) the sense of
the enantioselectivity is dominated by chiral phosphoric
acid 1b, (ii) the present catalysis does not allow chiral
phosphoric acid 1b to regenerate, and (iii) silylated phos-
phoric acid catalyzes the reaction quite slowly which
reduces enantioselectivity, indicating that the present reac-
tion proceeds via chiral Brønsted acid initiated silyl Lewis
acid catalysis among previously reported mechanisms.7
Scheme 1. Role of Additional Brønsted Acid in Combined
Brønsted Acid System
Table 1. Initial Survey of the Reaction of Allyltrimethylsilane
Because of the specific character as well as the low
nucleophilicity of allyltrimethylsilane, the proper choice
of Brønsted acidity, neither too strong nor too weak, has to
be of primary importance.7,8 The chiral phosphoric acids
possessing an electron-withdrawing group were chosen as
the chiral Brønsted acid catalyst in view of their relatively
strong acidity. Initial investigation using 20 mol % catalyst
loading revealed that while 20 mol % of 1a, with a 3,5-bis-
trifluoromethylphenyl group, was able to initiate the reac-
tion of N-acyl imine 2aa, enantioselectivity was very low
(Table 1, entry 1). In contrast, the reaction with 1b,
possessing a pentafluorophenyl group, afforded the homo-
allylamine 4aa with moderate enantioselectivity (entry 2).
Next, a survey of appropriate solvents for this reaction was
undertaken in the presence of 20 mol % of 1b. The use of
solvents other than toluene or ethyl acetate led to either a
significant decline in enantioselectivity or no reaction
(entries 2 and 3). To improve the chemical yields, the
reactions were examined at higher temperatures and/or
extended reaction times. When the reaction was conducted
at 40 °C for 2 days, no effects was observed on either
chemical yield or enantioselectivity (entry 4). In sharp
contrast, continuing the reaction for 7 days resulted in a
considerable improved in the chemical yield, accompanied
by a significant decrease in enantioselectivity (entry 5).
It is evident that the inferior enantioselectivity obtained
with extended reaction time may be due to the distinctive
pathways facilitated by different catalyst species during the
reaction. The details associated with the catalyst species
responsible for enantioselectivity were investigated by
employing stoichiometric amounts of chiral phosphoric
entrya 1 (mol %)
2
solvent temp (°C) yieldb (%) eec (%)
1
2
1a (20)
1b (20)
1b (20)
1b (20)
1b (20)
2aa toluene
2aa toluene
2aa EtOAc
2aa toluene
2aa toluene
30
30
30
40
40
30
30
30
30
30
20
19
34
18
56
80
95
77
93
94
5 (R)
60 (R)
50 (R)
58 (R)
45 (R)
68 (R)
55 (R)
97 (R)
95 (R)
98 (R)
3
4
5d
6
1b (100) 2aa toluene
1b (100) 2aa EtOAc
1b (100) 2ab toluene
1b (100) 2ab EtOAc
7
8
9
10
1c (100)
2ab EtOAc
a The reactions were conducted with 2a and 3 for 2 days in the
presence of 1. b Isolated yield. c Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
d The reaction was conducted for 7 days.
Encouraged by this implementation of a chiral 1b in-
itiated HosomiꢀSakurai reaction, we conducted a survey
of structures with an acyl group using stoichiometric 1b to
improve the enantioselectivity.9 From this survey, the 3,5-
bis-tert-butylbenzoyl group (imine 2ab) surfaced as an
attractive substituent that afforded promising levels of
enantioselection (entries 8 and 9). In terms of the chemical
yield, reaction in ethyl acetate gave better results than that
in toluene (entry 9). Furthermore, the replacement of
binaphthyl with octahydrobinaphthyl as the catalyst led
to an increase in enantioselectivity (98% ee) with no
detrimental effect on the yield (entry 10).
(7) (a) Olah, G. A.; Laali, K.; Farooq, O. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49,
4591–4594. (b) Davis, A. P.; Jaspars, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1990, 1176–1178. (c) Hollis, T. K.; Bosnich, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 4570–4581.
(8) For recent examples, see: (a) Kampen, D.; List, B. Synlett 2006,
2589–2592. (b) Kampen, D.; Ladepeche, A.; Claben, G.; List., B. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 962–966.
(9) For detailed experimental results, see the Supporting
Information.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 8, 2011
2127