(30 min each with sonication) and sonicated in a 1 mM ethanol
solution of 1 at 20 uC, washed with ethanol and finally dried by
nitrogen blow.
signal, and the absorption of bare ITO substrates in the blank
measurement was subtracted.
Fig. 1b shows the UV–vis absorption spectral changes upon
photoirradiation. In the initial spectrum of trans-1/ITO, the p–p*
transition of the azobenzene moiety was observed at 352 nm. A
27-nm red shift of the band compared with that in its ethanol
solution and an increase of the band intensity (from emax = 2.1 6
Cyclic voltammograms of 1/ITO were measured to confirm the
immobilization of 1 and to evaluate the degree of the molecular
aggregate in the monolayer. In the cyclic voltammograms of the
monolayer in Bu4NClO4–ethanol shown in Fig. 1a, a reversible
peak appeared at 0.05 V vs. ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/Fc),
almost equal to the value in ethanol solution (0.06 V vs. Fc+/Fc).
The peak current was proportional to the scan rate (Fig. 1a),
indicating that the peak can be ascribed to the Fe(III)/Fe(II) couple
of the ferrocene moieties of surface-confined 1.10
104 dm3 mol21 cm21 in ethanol to ca. 2.7 6 104 dm3 mol21 cm21
,
which was evaluated from the C value obtained from the cyclic
voltammogram) were derived from the J-aggregation of the
azobenzene moiety.12 The azo p–p* band decreased in intensity
with green (546 nm) light and further decreased with UV (365 nm)
light, and the band intensity was recovered with blue (436 nm)
light. Reproducibility was tested for 3 cycles. These behaviours are
characteristic of the trans-to-cis and cis-to-trans isomerization,
respectively, and are similar to the behaviours in solution. The cis
molar ratios of the azo moieties in the PSS were estimated to be
20% with the UV light, 10% with the green light, and almost 0%
with the blue light. These values are approximately one-third of
those in solution, probably because the isomerization of azo
moieties was restrained by the effect of J-aggregation.8
Surface coverage of redox active molecules (C) in the monolayer
was estimated from the anodic charge integration in the
voltammogram at a sweep rate of 0.1 V s21. The dependence of
C on the period of sonication indicates that the value was saturated
to ca. 1.7 6 10210 mol cm22 within 20 min (Fig. S4). The
relatively small C value against the saturated value of the
monolayer of usual ferrocene derivatives, ca.
6
6
10210 mol cm22, and a small peak shift on the formation of the
monolayer suggest that molecules of 1 in the prepared monolayer
were loosely packed and may not have had too much
intermolecular interaction for the photoisomerization reaction,11
even if local molecular aggregation was observed in the UV–vis
spectrum as shown below. The contact angle of water on the
substrate was also measured, and the angle was increased from
31(1)u to 63(2)u after sonication for 1 h with the solution of 1. This
increase suggests that the substrate was surely covered with
hydrophobic molecules. The 1/ITO samples used in the following
experiments were prepared by immersion for 24 h and sonication
for 1 h. All UV–vis spectra of 1/ITOs shown below were measured
in a cell shown in Fig. S5 for the convenience of the redox- and
photoirradiation-coupled measurement. These spectra are the sum
of two layers on the two substrates to increase the absorption
The single-light photoisomerization cycle of 1/ITO was achieved
by the combination of green light and electrochemical or chemical
redox reactions. Four states of 1/ITO during a single-light
photoisomerization cycle and the operations to change these states
are summarized in Scheme 1a. In the case of electrochemical
redox-coupled measurements, large UV–vis spectral changes of the
bare ITO substrate and the electrolyte solution were observed
when the potential was applied. In order to eliminate this
perturbation, the absorption spectra obtained from two different
sets of experiments at the same potential, route 1 (‘dark’) and route
2 (‘illuminated’) in Scheme 1b, were compared to prove the single-
light photoisomerization event.
A trans-1/ITO in the reduced Fe(II) state in Bu4NClO4–MeCN
(A state in Scheme 1a) was irradiated with the green light to reach
the PSS (B state), and the resulting mixture of trans- and cis-forms
was electrochemically oxidized to the Fe(III) state by holding the
potential at 0.32 V vs. Fc+/Fc for 5 min in the dark (C state),
followed by a reduction to the Fe(II) state by holding the potential
at 20.08 V vs. Fc+/Fc for 30 s (B9 state), and the spectrum was
measured. The next run was carried out under the same conditions
and with the same procedures, but the monolayer was irradiated
with the green light during 5 min oxidation, which should cause
isomerization to the D state. After the reduction to the Fe(II) state
(A9 state), the spectrum was measured. The differences in the UV–
vis spectral changes between the ‘dark’ and ‘illuminated’ conditions
are shown in Fig. 2a-A (see Fig. S6 for difference absorption
spectra in both conditions). Based on the amount of increase in the
absorption intensity in the p–p* region, approximately 10% of 1
was converted to the trans-form by the green light. This ratio is
almost equal to the ratio in the trans-to-cis photoisomerization
with green light in the Fe(II) state (see Fig. 1b). This spectrum
therefore indicates that the cis-form generated by the green light
irradiation to 1/ITO in the reduced Fe(II) state did not return to
the trans-form with oxidation to the Fe(III) state and the following
re-reduction, and returned to the trans-form by the photoreaction
of 1+/ITO with the irradiation of green light in the oxidized Fe(III)
state. It is noteworthy that the trans-1/ITO in the re-reduced Fe(II)
state could again be converted to the cis-form by irradiation with
Fig. 1 Electrochemical and photochemical properties of 1/ITO. (a)
Cyclic voltammograms of 1/ITO in 0.1 M Bu4NClO4–ethanol vs. Fc+/Fc
at a scan rate of 25, 50, 75, 150, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mV s21 (from inside
to outside). Inset: The peak current plot vs. scan rate. The monolayer was
prepared by the immersion method with 1 h sonication. (b) UV–vis
absorption spectrum of 1/ITO (solid line) and its 546-nm (dashed line),
365-nm (dotted line), and 436-nm (dash-dotted line) photoirradiated
spectra. These spectra are the sum of two substrates. Inset: Differences in
the UV–vis absorption spectra of 1/ITO between before irradiation and
after 546-nm (dashed line, A), 365-nm (dotted line, B), and 436-nm (dash-
dotted line, C) irradiation. Immersion time: 25 h (including 1 h sonication).
Irradiation time: 1 h.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Chem. Commun., 2007, 4650–4652 | 4651