10.1002/chem.201803004
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
Previous DFT studies had characterized the mechanisms for
transition-metal-free diboration and borylation of alkenes by
diboron reagents activated with Lewis bases.[10,18] Those studies
proposed that the nucleophilic attack of the adduct [MeO-Bpin-
Bpin]- to double bond yields an anionic, 3-membered boracycle
intermediate (see Scheme 4, top) an the release of Bpin-OMe.
Subsequent protonation leads to the hydroborated product. For
allenamides, we propose that the formation of this anionic
intermediate is favoured because conjugation with the exocyclic
C=C bond stabilizes the negative charge. However, in these
allenamides, the boracycle intermediate can open to form a more
stable allylic anion that can be then protonated to give the final
product. To evaluate this mechanistic proposal and to rationalize
the observed stereoselective, we have performed DFT
calculations[19] on the key intermediates, using substrates 1 and 7
as representative examples.
of the process. Moreover, in the structures of the more stable
allylic anion, the amine substituent has an anti-configuration (see
Scheme 4) that should yield a trans configuration between the
amine and the Bpin substitutens in the major alkene product A.
To understand the difference in reactivity between the C and C,
we performed an analysis of charge distribution in the allylic
intermediates 1al and 7al (Scheme 4). Our calculations show that
the C is more negatively charged than the C, and consequently,
more reactive towards electrophiles in full agreement with
experimental selectivity. The protonation at the Cresults in
products (1A and 7A) which are more stable than that resulting
from protonation at C (1B and 7B) by 7.0 and 2.6 kcal·mol-1,
respectively. Nevertheless, we assume that the selectivity is not
thermodynamically but kinetically controlled in the irreversible
protonation step. Accordantly, in the allylic intermediate 7al, the
difference in atomic charges is larger than that computed for 1al,
which could explain the higher selectivity observed in the
hydroboration of allenamide 7.
R= tosyl (1), acyl (7)
boracycle intermediates
allyl
vinylic systems
H
H
R
R
N
N
Bpin
Bpin
1p: -19.6
7p: -16.2
1B
7B
q(C) = -.63
MeO
(-.64)
OMe
H+
Bpin
MeOBpin
R
R
N
N
·
G1 = - 7.0
G7 = -2.6
q(C) = -.83
+ [MeO-B2pin2]-
(-.93)
OMe
OMe
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction structure of stereocontrolled borylated product 14A
MeOBpin
H+
1al: -35.0
7al
1: 0.0
7: 0.0
: -30.0
G1d = 1.7
G7d = 5.1
R
R
Bpin
Bpin
N
N
Taking advantage of the exclusive regioselectivity observed by
the acyl substituted allenamide 7, we conducted a series of
reactivity to stablish the substrate scope but also the limitations in
the methodology. Changing the electron properties of the para-
substituents of the aryl group in the allenamide substrates, it was
proved that electron releasing para-substituents contributed to
quantitative conversions with complete stereoselectivity towards
the formation of the Z-isomer (Table 2, entries 1-3). However, a
trend that diminished conversions was observed when electron
withdrawing para-substituents on the aryl group were involved,
(Table 1, entries 4 and 5), but fortunately without effecting the
exclusive regioselective product formation. Replacement of the
Me group by t-Bu group at the acyl moiety, did not influenced in
the reaction outcome, since product 12A was obtained in
H
H
H
1d
7d: -20.4
1A
7A
: -20.0
OMe
OMe
Scheme 4.Proposed mechanism for the hydroboration of allenamides1 and 7.
Relative Gibbs free-energies and barriers (G‡) in kcal·mol-1. Electrostatic-
based atomic charges for the and carbons of allyl species in a.u.
Scheme 4 summarizes the results of our computational study for
allenamides 1 and 7. Initially, we characterized the formation of
the two boracycle intermediates corresponding to the borylation
of the proximal (1p and 7p) and distal (1d and 7d) double bonds.
The functionalization of the distal C=C bond is thermodynamically
preferred, although in the case of the tosyl substituent (1), both
regioisomers are almost isoenergetic. Nevertheless, for both
substituents the open allylic species 1al and 7al with the Bpin
moiety attached to central carbon are thermodynamically
favoured, the overall process for boryl addition to allene being
highly exergonic, -35.0 and -30.0 kcal·mol-1 for 1al and 7al,
respectively. In addition, the formation of the allylic intermediate
from boracycle has a low free-energy barrier (1.7 and 5.1
kcal·mol-1, respectively, from the lowest energy distal isomers 1d
and 7d), indicating that the process is a very fast transformation
at the high reaction temperature. Thus, it is likely that protonation
to yield the hydroborated product occurs at the allylic intermediate
and that this irreversible reaction step determines the selectivity
quantitatively yield as
a
single Z-isomer from N-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-N-(propa-1,2-dien-1-yl)pivalamide (12), (Table
2, entry 6).The reaction was also generalized for N-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-N-(propa-1,2-dien-1-yl)benzamide
(14)
demonstrating that the nature of the aryl substituents in the acyl
group contributed similarly to the borylation reaction (Table 2,
entry 8). The exclusive product (14A) formed from the transition-
metal-free borylation of 14, could be fully characterized with the
X-ray diffraction structure. Figure
1 illustrates the trans-
stereoselectivity of the amine and boryl moieties along the
trisubstituted alkene. Moreover, the electron releasing
substituents in the phenyl group favoured the reaction in contrast
to the electron withdrawing substituents (Table 2, entries 8 and 9
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.