the nitrile can be used as solvent, but this can present obvious
disadvantages with expensive or less accessible nitriles. In
this regard, we illustrate here through the total synthesis of
(()-goniomitine that a high-value synthetic nitrile can be
an effective reaction partner even when used as the limiting
reagent in the annelation reaction. Additionally, this work
clearly shows for the first time the utility of the DA
cyclopropane/nitrile annelation reaction for the synthesis of
a functionalized indole.10
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Nitrile 4
Retrosynthetic analysis suggested that reaching indole 2,
an intermediate in the Takano synthesis, would be an ideal
target for a formal synthesis of goniomitine (Scheme 1). The
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
yield by enolization of 10 with LDA in THF followed by
alkylation with THP ether 11. The cyano substituent was
introduced through a three-step sequence involving THP
hydrolysis (cat. TsOH, MeOH, 90%), formation of chloride
14 with methanesulfonyl chloride (MsCl, Et3N, CH2Cl2), and
displacement of the intermediate halide with sodium cyanide
in DMSO (70% over two steps). The reaction was more
conveniently performed without loss in yield by heating the
reaction to 130 °C in a microwave reactor with MeCN as
solvent. Attempts to secure nitrile 4 directly by alkylation
of lactam 10 with acrylonitrile or 3-halopropionitrile (chloro,
bromo, and iodo) gave low yields and complex mixtures,
even after pretreatment of the lithium enolate with MgBr2
or ZnCl2. However, reaction of 10 with a mixture of ZnCl2,
TMSOTf, and Et3N (30 min, 0 °C) followed by addition of
acrylonitrile gave 4 in 38% yield. Curiously, isolation of the
silyl ether and subsequent reaction with acrylonitrile in the
presence of various Lewis acids was less effective. For large
scale work, the three-step sequence was preferred.
With nitrile 4 at hand, the stage was set for the critical
cycloaddition between it and DA cyclopropane 5 (Scheme
3). Gratifyingly, after some straightforward optimization, the
tetrahydroindole adduct 15 was secured in 74% yield on 10
g scale (by reaction of nitrile 4 (1.0 equiv), cyclopropane 5
(2.9 equiv), and Me3SiOTf (1.05 equiv) in EtNO2 (2.7 M)
at -30 °C). Catalytic oxidation of tetrahydroindole 15 with
palladium on carbon in refluxing mesitylene gave indole 16
in an excellent 98% yield. Catalysis of the oxidation with
palladium hydroxide gave similar results, but the use of
manganese oxide or DDQ as the oxidant resulted in lower
yields. Together, these steps illustrate the power of the formal
[3 + 2] nitrile/DA cyclopropane annelation methodology to
prepare functionalized indoles in a straightforward and
efficient manner.
indole 2 can be derived from tetrahydroindole 3 by an oxi-
dation state adjustment of the aromatic ring and installation
of a keying ester group insertion at C3. The tetrahydroindole
intermediate 3 will in turn be accessed in a convergent
fashion by the formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between
nitrile 4 and known DA cyclopropane 5.5b A plausible
mechanistic pathway for this key step likely involves the
nitrilium ion intermediate 7 formed in a Ritter-like process
by attack on the oxocarbenium ion 6. The reversible nature
of the nitrile addition is supported by the divergent stereo-
chemical outcomes of allylation reactions11 and nitrile
annelations5a of carbohydrate-derived cyclopropyl lactones.
The synthesis of nitrile 4 began with the one-pot alkylation
and N-benzylation of commercially available δ-valerolactam
9 to produce the known lactam 1012 (Scheme 2). Creation
of the quaternary center of lactam 12 was achieved in 92%
The C3 ester side chain, an artifact of the cycloaddition
methodology, can in principle serve as an intermediate for
constructing the hydroxyethyl side chain in the natural
product. In practice, it was found more convenient to remove
the ester through decarboxylation and subsequently build the
hydroxyethyl group. The decarboxylation was achieved by
heating 16 to reflux in a mixture of NaOH, EtOH, and water
(8) Yu, M.; Pagenkopf, B. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 5099-5101.
(9) (a) Yu, M.; Pagenkopf, B. L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 321-347. (b)
Gnad, F.; Reiser, O. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1603-1624. (c) Reissig, H.
Y.; Zimmer, R. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1151-1196.
(10) Gribble, G. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 1045-1075.
(11) Yu, M.; Pagenkopf, B. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4639-4640.
(12) Suh, Y.-G.; Kim, S.-A.; Jung, J.-K.; Shin, D.-Y.; Min, K.-H.; Koo,
B.-A.; Kim, H.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3545-3547.
158
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008