Merocyanine-Like Chromophores as Ligands
FULL PAPER
H), 7.45 (m, 2 H, aryl-H), 5.50 (m, 1 H, allyl C-H), 3.55 (d, J =
7.5 Hz, 2 H, allyl CH2), 3.03 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 2 H, allyl CH2) ppm.
15.8755(2), b = 20.4987(3), c = 32.8158(4) Å, β = 101.482(1)°, V =
10465.4(2) Å3, T = –90 °C, Z = 2, ρcalcd. = 1.475 gcm–3, µ (Mo-Kα)
13C NMR (CD2Cl2, 100 MHz): δ = 199.0, 178.8, 149.1, 134.9, = 10.77 cm–1, F(000) = 4714, 60125 reflections in h(–18/20), k(–26/
132.3, 131.5 [q, 2J(C,F) = 33.2 Hz], 130.9, 128.6, 125.8, 123.3 [q,
1J(C,F) = 272.7 Hz], 119.2, 116.1, 62.3 ppm. FAB-MS (NBA): m/z pleteness Θmax = 99.3%, 23821 independent reflections, Rint
(%) = 743 [M]+, 702 [M – allyl]+, 597 [M – allyl – Pd + H]+. UV/
0.030, 18727 reflections with Fo Ͼ 4σ(Fo), 1272 parameters, 0 re-
Vis (THF): λmax (lgε) = 549 (4.0), 590 nm (4.0). C28H16F12N4Pd straints, R1obs = 0.087, wR2obs = 0.271, R1all = 0.111, wR2all = 0.289,
26), l(–42/36), measured in the range 1.18° Յ Θ Յ 27.47°, com-
=
(742.86): calcd. C 45.27, H 2.17, N 7.54; found C 45.25, H 2.16, N
7.45.
GOOF = 2.184, largest difference peak and hole: 3.707/–1.610
e Å–3.
Crystal Data for 4a:[15] C28H16F12N4OPd·H2O, Mr
=
1
Complex 4b: Yield: 274 mg (55%). H NMR (CD2Cl2, 250 MHz):
759.86 gmol–1, red-brown prism, size 0.04ϫ0.04ϫ0.03 mm, mo-
noclinic, space group C2/m, a = 18.7198(8), b = 18.9056(8), c =
9.8808(2) Å, β = 120.749(2)°, V = 3005.29(19) Å3, T = –90 °C, Z
= 4, ρcalcd. = 1.679 gcm–3, µ (Mo-Kα) = 7.22 cm–1, F(000) = 1500,
10750 reflections in h(–24/24), k(–22/24), l(–12/12), measured in the
range 1.66° Յ Θ Յ 27.50°, completeness Θmax = 99.4%, 3540 inde-
pendent reflections, Rint = 0.039, 2996 reflections with Fo Ͼ 4σ(Fo),
δ = 8.33 (m, 2 H, aryl-H), 7.51 (m, 7 H, aryl-H), 7.21 (m, 4 H,
aryl-H), 5.63 (m, 1 H, allyl-CH), 3.62 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H, allyl-
CH2), 3.16 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 2 H, allyl-CH2), 2.40 (s, 6 H, CH3) ppm.
Micro-ESI-MS (methanol): m/z (%) = 499 [M + H]+. UV/Vis
(THF): λmax (lgε) = 560 (4.0), 600 nm (4.0). C26H24N4Pd (498.92):
calcd. C 62.59, H 4.85, N 11.23; found C 62.55, H 4.80, N 11.31.
1
Complex 4c: Yield: 291 mg (50%). H NMR (CD2Cl2, 250 MHz):
226 parameters, 0 restraints, R1obs = 0.064, wR2obs = 0.186, R1all
=
δ = 8.35 (m, 2 H, aryl-H), 7.57 (m, 5 H, aryl-H), 7.43 (m, 6 H,
aryl-H), 5.60 (m, 1 H, allyl-CH), 3.64 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 2 H, allyl-
CH2), 3.15 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 2 H, allyl-CH2), 1.38 (s, 18 H,
CH3) ppm. Micro-ESI-MS (methanol): m/z (%) = 582 [M + H]+.
UV/Vis (THF): λmax (lgε) = 563 (4.1), 604 nm (4.1). C32H36N4Pd
(583.08): calcd. C 65.92, H 6.22, N 9.61; found C 65.90, H 6.18, N
9.55.
0.077, wR2all = 0.203, GOOF = 1.055, largest difference peak and
hole: 2.860/–0.943 e Å–3.
Cyclovoltammetric Instrumentation and Procedures: Cyclic square-
wave voltammetry was conducted with the 3-electrode technique
using a home-built computer-controlled instrument based on the
PCI 6110 data acquisition board (National Instruments). The ex-
periments were performed in DMF containing 0.25- tetrabu-
tylammonium hexafluorophosphate (Merck, Darmstadt) under a
blanket of solvent-saturated argon. The DMF was purified by stir-
ring with NaH, distilled under reduced pressure and stored over
molsieves 4A under argon.
1
Complex 4d: Yield: 362 mg (65%). H NMR (CD2Cl2, 250 MHz):
δ = 8.22 (m, 2 H, aryl-H), 7.61 (m, 4 H, aryl-H), 7.39 (m, 3 H,
aryl-H), 6.64 (m, 4 H, aryl-H), 5.53 (m, 1 H, allyl-CH), 3.56 (d, J
= 6.9 Hz, 2 H, allyl-CH2), 3.09 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 2 H, allyl-CH2),
2.91 [s, 12 H, N(CH3)2] ppm. Micro-ESI-MS (methanol): m/z (%)
= 556 [M]+. UV/Vis (THF): λmax = 630, 673 nm. C28H30N6Pd
(557.01): calcd. C 60.38, H 5.43, N 15.09; found C 60.40, H 5.48,
N 15.05.
The Ohmic resistance that had to be compensated was determined
by measuring the impedance of the system at potentials where the
Faradayic current was negligibly small. Background correction was
accomplished by subtracting the current curves of the blank elec-
trolyte (containing the same concentration of supporting electro-
lyte) from the experimental curves.
Heck Reaction Catalyzed by Complex 4a: In a typical experiment,
4-bromoacetophenone (6.25 mmol) and anhydrous sodium acetate
(7 mmol) were placed in a 25-mL two-necked flask equipped with
a stirring bar, reflux condenser and septum. The flask was degassed
under vacuum and purged with argon to ensure an inert reaction
atmosphere. Then, N,N-dimethylacetamide (10 mL) as the solvent
and n-butyl acrylate (0.5 g) were added through the septum. The
reaction mixture was thoroughly stirred and heated to the appro-
priate reaction temperature at which it was held for 5 min followed
by treatment with the catalyst solution containing complex 4a
(1.25 µmol in 0.5 mL of THF). After the appropriate time intervals
samples (0.5 mL) of the reaction mixture were hydrolyzed with 2
HCl (0.5 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL). The organic
phase was dried with K2CO3 and stored at –21 °C until GC analy-
sis for determination of the yield.
Working electrode: hanging mercury drop (mHg–drop = 3.95–
4.00 mg) produced by the CGME instrument (Bioanalytical Sys-
tems Inc., West Lafayette, USA). A platinum wire served as the
counter electrode. Internal reference electrode: Ag/AgCl electrode
in acetonitrile containing 0.25 tetrabutylammonium chloride.
However, for convenience all potentials reported in this paper
refer to the ferrocenium/ferrocene couple. The latter was
measured at the end of each experiment using a 1.5-mm Pt disk
electrode. The evaluation of the experiments was accomplished by
subjecting the experimental voltammograms to a nonlinear re-
gression procedure using the freely available DigiElch software
(htpp://www.DigiElch.de).
Crystal Structure Determination: The intensity data for the com-
pounds were collected with a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer,
using graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation. Data were cor-
rected for Lorentz and polarization effects, but not for absorp-
tion.[11,12] The structures were solved by direct methods
(SHELXS[13]) and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques
against Fo2 (SHELXL-97[14]). The hydrogen atoms of the structures
were included at calculated positions with fixed thermal param-
eters. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.[14] XP
(Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments, Inc.) was used for structure
representations.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(SFB 436).
[1] a) M. Döhring, R. Beckert, H. Görls, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
1994, 620, 551–560; b) P. Fehling, M. Döring, F. Knoch, R.
Beckert, H. Görls, Chem. Ber. 1995, 128, 405–412; c) M.
Döring, P. Fehling, H. Görls, W. Imhof, R. Beckert, D. Lin-
dauer, J. Prakt. Chem./Chem.-Ztg. 1999, 341, 748–756.
[2] a) M. Ruben, S. Rau, A. Skirl, K. Krause, H. Görls, D. Wal-
ther, J. G. Vos, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 303, 206–214; b) T.
Döhler, H. Görls, D. Walther, Chem. Commun. 2000, 945–946;
c) M. Ruben, D. Walther, R. Knake, H. Görls, R. Beckert, Eur.
Crystal Data for 3a:[15] 2C55H31F24N8NiO2·C50H82Ni8O30·
3CH2Cl2·H2O, Mr
0.05ϫ0.05ϫ0.04 mm, monoclinic, space group P21/c,
=
4649.27 gmol–1, red-brown prism, size
a
=
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 481–486
© 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
485