to the decisive role of chiral ligands for both catalytic activity
and high level of enantioselectivity, considerable efforts have
been devoted to the design and synthesis of a variety of chiral
ligands.3 Inspired by the tremendous success achieved in the
use of Rh- and Ru-BINAP-catalyzed asymmetric reactions,4
many atropisomeric C2-symmetric biaryl diphosphine ligands,
such as H8-BINAP,5 MeO-BIPHEP,6 SEGPHOS,7 P-Phos,8 and
other important biaryl phosphine ligands, have been developed
in the past two decades (Figure 1).3
Convenient Divergent Strategy for the Synthesis
of TunePhos-Type Chiral Diphosphine Ligands
and Their Applications in Highly Enantioselective
Ru-Catalyzed Hydrogenations
Xianfeng Sun,† Le Zhou,‡ Wei Li,† and Xumu Zhang*,†
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology &
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Rutgers, The State UniVersity of
New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8066, and College
of Science, Northwest A&F UniVersity, Yangling,
Shaanxi 712100, The People’s Republic of China
ReceiVed September 20, 2007
FIGURE 1. Some atropisomeric C2-symmetric biaryl ligands.
Although these atropisomeric biaryl ligands are highly
effective for many asymmetric transformations, the search for
more practical and efficient ligands in terms of ease of
preparation, high enantioselectivity, and high turnover number
(TON) remains an important goal in asymmetric hydrogenation.
Recently, we have developed a novel class of conformation-
ally rigid Cn-TunePhos (Figure 1, n ) 1-6) ligands, by
introducing a bridge with variable length to link the chiral
atropisomeric biaryl groups.9 This family of TunePhos ligands
has proven highly efficient in a variety of asymmetric reac-
tions.10 Apart from optimization in length of these alkyl linkers,
we envision that changes of the phosphorus substituents of
TunePhos ligands are also important structural modifications,
which may endow these new ligands with unique steric and
electronic properties. With respect to the efficient synthesis of
a class of such ligand analogues, the established synthetic routes
from MeO-BIPHEP and its derivatives have some disadvan-
tages, as described in Schmid’s report.6 Specifically, the
phosphinous or phosphinic acid derivatives or the secondary
phosphines have to be synthesized separately in each case
(typically starting from a phosphorus trichloride) which elon-
A convenient, divergent strategy for the synthesis of a series
of modular and fine-tunable C3-TunePhos-type chiral diphos-
phine ligands and their applications in highly efficient Ru-
catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenations were explored. Up to
97 and 99% ee values were achieved for the enantioselective
synthesis of â-methyl chiral amines and R-hydroxy acid
derivatives, respectively.
(2) Noyori, R. Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2108; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2008.
(3) (a) Tang, W.; Zhang, X. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3029. (b) Shimizu,
H.; Nagasaki, I.; Saito, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5405.
The biological activity of many pharmaceutical compounds,
agrochemicals, flavors, and fragrances is associated with
absolute molecular configuration, which makes the enantiose-
lective synthesis of chiral compounds an important topic.1 The
development of efficient methods to achieve this goal has been
a substantial challenge for chemists in both academia and
industry. Among various strategies, catalytic asymmetric hy-
drogenation mediated by transition metal complexes provides
one of the most practical and powerful routes due to its
remarkable features, including high stereoselectivity, high
reactivity, atom economy, and operational simplicity.2 Owing
(4) Miyashita, A.; Yasuda, A.; Takaya, H.; Toriumi, K.; Tto, I.; Souchi,
T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7935.
(5) Zhang, X.; Mashima, K.; Koyano, K.; Sayo, N.; Kumobayashi, H.;
Akutagawa, S.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7283.
(6) Schmid, R.; Broger, E. A.; Cereghtti, M.; Crameri, Y.; Foricher, J.;
Lalonde, M.; Muller, R. K.; Scalone, M.; Schoettel, G.; Zutter, U. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 131.
(7) Saito, T.; Yokozawa, T.; Ishizaki, T.; Moroi, T.; Sayo, N.; Miura,
T.; Kumobayashi, H. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343.
(8) Pai, C.-C.; Lin, C.-W.; Lin, C.-C.; Chen, C.-C.; Chan, A. S. C.; Wong,
W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11513.
(9) (a) Zhang, X. U.S. Patent 6521769, 2003 (filed 1999). (b) Zhang,
Z.; Qian, H.; Longmire, J.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6223.
(10) (a) Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Tang, W.; Lin, M.; Zhang, X. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 4495. (b) Tang, W.; Wu, S.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 9570. (c) Lei, A.; Wu, S.; He, M.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 1626. (d) Wang, C.-J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117,
5013; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4933. (e) Wang, C.-J.; Sun, X.;
Zhang, X. Synlett 2006, 1169. (f) Raghunath, M.; Zhang, X. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 7017.
† Rutgers.
‡ Northwest A&F University.
(1) (a) Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed.; VCH: New York,
2000. (b) Brown, J. M. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen,
E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, 1999. (c)
Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis; Noyori, R., Ed.; Wiley: New
York, 1994.
10.1021/jo702068w CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/03/2008
J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1143-1146
1143