widely used for the last 10 years as a central building block
within the backbone of polymers or oligomers leading to a
strong enhancement of the OLED properties.9,12-14 However,
to the best of our knowledge, the (2,1-a)-IF positional isomer
has only been reported in two instances15,16 and is unknown
with spiro linkages. In this context, we thus designed and
prepared, through an expedient synthesis, two new dispiro
chromophores, (1,2-b)-DSF(t-Bu)4-IF 5 and (2,1-a)-DSF-
(t-Bu)4-IF 6, with shape persistent molecular architectures
and different geometric profiles, i.e., linear antarafacial and
suprafacial geometries.8 The synthetic route is presented in
Scheme 1. It is based on a coupling reaction between
the difluorenol 4 in moderate yield (50%). This reaction
appeared to be highly sensitive to the dilithiate intermediary
formation time. Indeed, a byproduct, identified as the
monoalcohol 4′ by X-ray crystallography is always formed
(cf. the Supporting Information). Very short reaction time
for metal-halogen exchange followed by immediate quench-
ing with 3 is essential to minimize the formation of 4′. The
intramolecular cyclization reaction performed in acidic
medium leads to the expected formation of 5 and 6. These
molecules possess two spiro-linked fluorene rings and a
central IF backbone (1,2-b- or 2,1-a-substituted). Compound
6 appears to be the first example of a spiro-linked (2,1-a)-
IF core. As shown in Table 1, the conversion of the diol 4
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 5 and 6
Table 1. 6/5 Ratio for Different Reaction Conditions
solvent
T (°C)
6/5 ratioa (%) reaction time (min)
acid
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2 rt
AcOH
AcOH
AcOH
0
19/81
24/76
40/60
50/50
60/40
30
30
overnight
180
120
H2SO4
H2SO4
HCl
HCl
HCl
5 to rtb
rt to 70
reflux
a The 6/5 ratio was determined from the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude
reaction before any treatment. b 3 h at 5 °C and overnight at rt.
to 5 and 6 is highly sensitive to the reaction conditions,
including the acid, the solvent, and the reaction temperature.
Preliminary studies indicate that the ratio of these two
isomers may be strongly modulated going to a 6/5 ratio of
19/81 to 60/40 depending on these reaction conditions. The
isolated yields of both isomers are in each case greater than
80%.
diiodinated terphenyl (2,2′′-DITP)6 and 2,7-tert-butylfluo-
renone 3, followed by a key intramolecular cyclization
reaction. From a statistical point of view, this cyclization
step may occur on either side of the terphenyl backbone and
should lead to the (1,2-b)-DSF(t-Bu)4-IF 5 and (2,1-a)-DSF-
(t-Bu)4-IF 6. Although the bulkiness of the tert-butyl
substituents should in principle favor the less sterically
hindered positional isomer we expected the formation of both
isomers. Indeed, the formation of conceptually related
positional isomers from a terphenyl backbone has been
previously observed with indolocarbazole derivatives by
Leclerc and co-workers.17,18 Theoretical calculations (full
optimization on simplified models of the two isomers without
tert-butyl groups at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory vide
infra) indicate that the 5-like isomer is only less than 8 kcal
mol-1 more stable than the 6-like isomer.
The two isomers 5 and 6 were easily separated by column
chromatography. Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation
(HMBC) spectra were performed for both isomers in order
to ascertain their molecular structures through long-range
shift correlations. In this context, the spiro carbons are
powerful probes to detect neighboring hydrogens. For 5, three
cross-peaks are observed for the spiro carbon atoms corre-
sponding to three-bond correlations (3J) with Ha (7.21 ppm),
Hb (6.74 ppm), and Hc (6.65 ppm), Figure 1a. The spectrum
3
of 6 exhibits only two J correlations with the spiro carbon
As shown in Scheme 1, the lithium-iodine exchange of
2,2′′-DITP with n-butyllithium at low temperature followed
by quenching with 2,7-tert-butylfluorenone 319,20 afforded
(12) Grimsdale, A. C.; Mu¨llen, K. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2007,
28, 1676-1702.
(13) Jacob, J.; Zhang, J.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Mu¨llen, K.; Gaal, M.; List,
E. J. W. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 8240-8245.
(14) Merlet, S.; Birau, M.; Wang, Z. Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2157-2159.
(15) Deuschel, W. HelV. Chim. Acta 1951, 34, 2403-2416.
(16) Covion Organic Semiconductors: Eur. Pat. Appl., EP 1491568,
2004.
(17) Blouin, N.; Michaud, A.; Wakim, S.; Boudreault, P.-L. T.; Leclerc,
M.; Vercelli, B.; Zecchin, S.; Zotti, G. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2006, 207,
166-174.
(18) Wakim, S.; Leclerc, M. Synlett 2005, 8, 1223-1234.
(19) Weber, E.; Do¨rpinghaus, N.; Cso¨regh, I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
2 1990, 2167-2177.
(20) Stigers, K. D.; Koutroulis, M. R.; Chung, D. M.; Nowick, J. S. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3858-3860.
Figure 1. Portion of the HMBC (CDCl3) spectra of (a) 5 and (b)
6.
374
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 3, 2008