Scheme 2. Intramolecular Heck Cyclizations of Allylated
Table 2. Employing Alternative R,â-Unsaturated Carbonyl
Compoundsa
Vinyl Triflates
the absence of resonance stabilization. When pulegone (1l)
was subjected to the reaction, vinyl triflate 2l possessing an
all carbon quaternary center was isolated in good yield.
Next, we attempted to expand the scope of the reaction
by varying the type of carbonyl compound employed. To
this end, we treated enals, enoates, enamides, and vinylogous
esters to the optimized reaction conditions with varying
degrees of success (Table 2). Enal 1m11 underwent allylative
triflation in high yield. Vinyl triflate 2m was isolated as a
single olefin isomer, as assessed by NOESY correlation data
(see Supporting Information). Commercially available cou-
marins 3a,b also performed well in the reaction.12
While linear enoates such as methyl R-methylcinnamate
yielded a complex mixture of products, the conformationally
restricted enoate 3c13 proved a viable substrate for our
method. By contrast, no products from enamides such as 5
were isolable. Perhaps the most unusual result in this series
was the successful allylation of vinylogous ester 6 to generate
the â-alkoxy vinyl triflate 7. Such allylation with concomitant
regioselective installation of the vinyl triflate would be
challenging via conventional cuprate chemsitry due to facile
â-elimination of the alkoxy substituent. The use of triflic
anhydride circumvents the formation of the problematic
metallo enolate intermediate.
a Reagents and reaction conditions: enone (1 equiv), DTBP (1.5 equiv),
stannane (1.2 equiv), 4 Å molecular sieves (100 mg/mmol enone), and triflic
anhydride (1.2 equiv) in a 2:1 acetonitrile/methylene chloride mixture at 0
°C. b Yields are given for isolated products.
the corresponding vinylogous ester.9 Substrates 1c-k were
prepared according to a procedure developed by Strauss and
co-workers for ionic liquid-mediated aldol condensation.10
From Table 1, it is apparent that â-aryl-substituted enones
undergo the reaction in good to excellent yields. These are
robust substrates presumably due to their ability to stabilize
the developing positive charge in the allylic tifloxy cation.
This stabilization can be enhanced by the introduction of
electron-donating substituents on the aromatic ring (substrates
1b, 1d,e) which lend modest increases in yield. Ortho
substitution is tolerated (substrates 1f,g). Other electron-rich
arenes such as the substituted furan in enone 1h also are
suited for charge stabilization and perform well in the
reaction. Gratifyingly, electron-deficient arenes also exhibit
adequate stabilization without a severe decrease in yield.
Electron-withdrawing substituents in the para position (sub-
strates 1i-k) are compatible. The reaction also proceeds in
Vinyl triflates can be used in a host of transition metal-
mediated reactions.14 Indeed, vinyl triflates 2c-l and 4c
represent viable substrates for an intramolecular Heck
reaction. Treatment of 2e with Pd(OAc)2 in the presence of
(11) Desmond, R.; Mills, S. G.; Volante, R. P.; Shinkai, I. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1988, 29, 3895-3898.
(12) These compounds were isolated using a fluoride workup as described
in the Supporting Information.
(13) (a) Jackson, J. A.; Hammond, G. B.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 4750-5754. (b) Hutton, T. K.; Muir, K. W.; Procter, D. J. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 4811-4814.
(14) Ritter, K. Synthesis 1993, 735-762.
(6) Full details of reaction optimization can be found in the Supporting
Information.
(7) Davies, A. G. Organic Synthesis: Tin/Lithium Transmetallation, the
Stille Reaction, and the Removal of Tin Residues. In Organotin Chemistry,
2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004; pp 373-382 and the references
therein.
(15) For recent examples of ketene acetal triflates in cross-coupling
reactions, see: Stille: (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Pihko, P. M.; Bernal, F.;
Frederick, M. O.; Qian, W.; Uesaka, N.; Diedrichs, N.; Hinrichs, J.; Koftis,
T. V.; Loizidou, E.; Petrovic, G.; Rodriquez, M.; Sarlah, D.; Zou, N. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2244-2257. Suzuki: (b) Sasaki, M.; Fuwa,
H.; Inoue, M.; Tachibana, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9027-9030. (c)
Bartali, L.; Larini, P.; Guarna, A.; Occhiato, E. G. Synthesis 2007, 1733-
1737. Negishi: (d) Kadota, I.; Takamura, H.; Sato, K.; Yamamoto, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4729-4731. (e) Kadota, I.; Kadowaki, C.;
Takamura, H.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6199-6202. (f)
Kadota, I.; Takamura, H.; Sato, K.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 3494-3498.
(8) Renaud, P.; Lacoˆte, E.; Quaranta, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
2123-2126.
(9) Moritani, Y.; Appella, D. H.; Jurkauskas, V.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6797-6798.
(10) Kreher, U. P.; Rosamilia, A. E.; Raston, C. L.; Scott, J. L.; Strauss,
C. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3107-3110.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 5, 2008
871