M. R. Wood et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 3887–3890
3889
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for the rearrangement of the N-aryl piperidine to the N-aryl pyrrolidine.
alternate carbamate-forming, Burgess-type reagents.
For example, the tert-butyl Burgess reagent (12,
Scheme 5) was prepared and allowed to react with
alcohol 13 under slightly milder reaction conditions
(70°C, 20 h, benzene). This single, unoptimized attempt
yielded 41% of the desired Boc-protected amine,
demonstrating the potential for even these very hin-
dered and acid labile Burgess reagents.
This mechanism can be used to help rationalize the
routinely observed lower yields and faster reaction rates
of benzylic alcohols (Table 1, entry 7). While it is
possible that more side reactions occur due to greater
ionization at the benzylic carbon, this ionization might
also facilitate reaction of compound 3. If greater than
50% of the material is funneled from 3 plus 4 to 6, then
there will be insufficient 4 remaining to complete the
reaction cycle, thereby lowering yields. By contrast, the
reaction of benzyl alcohol described by Burgess3
afforded an 80% yield of the desired methyl carbamate.
The higher yield observed by Burgess may be a result of
performing the reaction neat at a higher temperature,
or the result of fewer steric interactions when forming a
methyl carbamate compared to a benzylic carbamate.
In summary, a novel method for the conversion of
primary alcohols into Cbz-protected amines has been
described. Mechanistic proposals for the overall reac-
tion, as well as an unexpected N-aryl piperidine to
N-aryl pyrrolidine rearrangement have been proposed
based on experimental observations. The complete
scope of carbamates that can be formed remains to be
explored.9
Returning to Table 1, entry 8, this unexpected rear-
rangement of an N-aryl piperidine to an N-aryl pyrro-
lidine during the course of the reaction was confirmed
by multidimensional 1H/13C NMR spectroscopy. In
addition to the 73% isolated yield of the pyrrolidine
product, a minor amount (ca. 7%) of the desired pipe-
ridine isomer was observed by LC/MS. The initial
adduct 9 (Scheme 4) forms smoothly and completely as
determined by LC/MS. Although this compound
should enter into an equilibrium in analogy to that
proposed for compound 3 (Scheme 3), an additional
equilibration between compounds 9 and 10 must also
be proposed. While some of compound 9 reacts as
expected to provide the piperidine product (not shown),
the majority of compound 9 is slowly converted to
compound 10, and eventually to the observed product,
through the intermediacy of the [2.2.1] bicyclic aryl
ammonium cation (11) and its presumably tightly asso-
ciated anion (5). If ions 11 and 5 were not closely
associated and nucleophilic attack on 11 by a nitrogen
nucleophile was the actual mechanism, it would be
difficult to rationalize the approximately 10:1 selectivity
seen for the pyrrolidine product over the piperidine
product. The tendency for the equilibrium to favor 10
over 9 might stem from several causes. As a result of
geometric constraints, k1 might be faster than k−2, while
k2 might be faster than k−1 for purely stochastic reasons
(two equivalent reaction sites for k2 versus only one
reaction site for k−1). In addition, compound 10 might
enjoy faster conversion to product due to reduced steric
demands on the nucleophile (absence of b-branching).
Although not shown for reasons of clarity, a similar
equilibration might take place through intermediates
analogous to compound 6 (Scheme 3).
Scheme 5. Formation of a Boc-protected amine.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor David A.
Evans, Dr. Mark G. Bock, Dr. Scott D. Kuduk and
Dr. Annette S. Kim for helpful discussions and Joan S.
Murphy for the detailed structural determination of
Table 1, entry 8.
References
1. Larock, R. C. Comprehensive Organic Transformations—A
Guide to Functional Group Preparations, 2nd ed.; John
Wiley & Sons: New York, 1999.
2. (a) Wada, M.; Mitsunobu, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13,
1279–1282; (b) Lee, B. H.; Miller, M. J.; Prody, C. A.;
Neilands, J. B. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 317–325; (c)
Dodd, D. S.; Kozikowski, A. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,
35, 977–980.
3. Burgess, E. M.; Penton, H. R., Jr.; Taylor, E. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1973, 38, 26–31.
4. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1991; pp. 317–318.
Other alcohols may be substituted in place of methanol
according to Scheme 1, resulting in the formation of