construction of bicyclic heterocycles by domino cyclization
using propargylic substrates having two nucleophilic func-
tional groups.
1, this domino cyclization could afford four types of bicyclic
products 6-9, depending on (1) which nucleophilic site (NuA
and NuB) would participate in the first cyclization (path A
vs B) and (2) which carbon (distal or proximal) would be
attacked on the second cyclization (path C vs D and E vs
F). Herein we describe the domino cyclization of propargyl
bromides 2 having two nitrogen functional groups to form
fused azacycles of the type 6 and 8. The remarkable effect
of the nucleophilicity of NA and NB on the outcome as well
as the stereochemical course of the reaction is also presented.
To avoid the regioselectivity issue during the first cycliza-
tion (path A vs B, Scheme 1), we investigated the reaction
of propargyl bromide 10a containing two hydroxy groups
tethered by two carbon atoms (Scheme 2). Use of this starting
During the course of our studies directed toward elucidat-
ing efficient cyclization reactions of allenic compounds,9 we
found that bromoallenes can act as allyl dication equivalents
in the presence of palladium(0) and alcohol. This reactivity
has been shown to be extremely useful for the synthesis of
medium-sized heterocycles10 as well as bicyclic sulfamides11
by successive bond formation. In light of this chemistry, we
envisioned that the domino cyclization of bromoallenes 1
having two nucleophilic sites (NuA and NuB) might lead to
bicyclic compounds by domino cyclization (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Reaction Course of Palladium-Catalyzed Domino
Cyclization of Allenyl/Propargyl Bromides 1 and 2
Scheme 2. Formation of Furan Derivatives by
Monocyclizationa
a Reaction conditions: for 10a, 14, and 15: Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol
%), NaH (2.5 equiv), MeOH, 60 °C; for 10b: Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3
(2.5 mol %), dppe (10 mol %), dioxane, 80 °C.
However, since efficient chemoselective preparation of 1,3-
disubstituted bromoallenes of the type 1 via conventional
bromination methods has proven to be difficult,12 we turned
our attention to the reaction of propargyl bromides 2, which
can be considered as a synthetic equivalent of bromoallenes
in the palladium-catalyzed reaction.13 As shown in Scheme
material has the advantage of allowing the production of a
highly symmetrical allenylpalladium intermediate. The bro-
mide 10a was readily prepared through the addition of the
acetylide of a protected but-3-yn-1-ol to a hydroxypropanal
derivative followed by bromination of the resulting protected
propargyl alcohol with CBr4 and PPh3 in the presence of
imidazole. Unfortunately, treatment of 10a with Pd(PPh3)4
(5 mol %) in the presence of in situ generated NaOMe
(standard conditions for cyclization of bromoallenes)10,11 gave
the furan derivative 11 in 62% yield. The reaction of the
carbonate 10b with Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 (2.5 mol %)/dppe (10
mol %) in dioxane also afforded 11 in 48% yield, without
promoting the desired domino cyclization. Formation of the
furan 11 can be rationalized through a â-hydride elimination
from the π-allylpalladium intermediate 12 followed by
aromatization of the diene 13. Similar results were obtained
with amino alcohol derivatives 14 and 15, both leading to
furan 16 in moderate yields. However, these unsuccessful
results clearly show that the anion of the hydroxy group of
14 and 15 is more reactive than that of the tosylamide group,
irrespective of their location (R1 or R2). Thus, both NuA and
(8) (a) Yoshida, M.; Ihara, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 616-
619. (b) Yoshida, M.; Fujita, M.; Ishii, T.; Ihara, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 4874-4881.
(9) (a) Ohno, H.; Hamaguchi, H.; Tanaka, T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2269-
2271. (b) Ohno, H.; Ando, K.; Hamaguchi, H.; Takeoka, Y.; Tanaka, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15255-15266. (c) Ohno, H.; Miyamura, K.;
Takeoka, Y.; Tanaka, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2647-2650. (d)
Ohno, H.; Mizutani, T.; Kadoh, Y.; Miyamura, K.; Tanaka, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5113-5115. (e) Ohno, H.; Aso, A.; Kadoh, Y.;
Fujii, N.; Tanaka, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6325-6328.
(10) (a) Ohno, H.; Hamaguchi, H.; Ohata, M.; Tanaka, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1749-1753. (b) Ohno, H.; Hamaguchi, H.; Ohata, M.;
Kosaka, S.; Tanaka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8744-8754.
(11) (a) Hamaguchi, H.; Kosaka, S.; Ohno, H.; Tanaka, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1513-1517. (b) Hamaguchi, H.; Kosaka, S.; Ohno, H.;
Fujii, N.; Tanaka, T. Chem.-Eur. J. 2007, 13, 1692-1708.
(12) For example, treatment of propargyl alcohols with CuBr‚SMe2 in
the presence of LiBr gave a mixture of allenyl/propargyl bromides.
(13) The reactivities of allenic and propargylic compounds are not
necessarily the same. For example, propargyl bromides and carbonates are
more reactive than bromoallenes toward SN2 reactions and alcoholysis,
respectively.10b
1172
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008