C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Photophysical Properties and Lifetime of 1 and 2 at 298
K
fore, this new tripod system can be used effectively for labeling of
biomolecules.
b
medium
λmax/nm (ΦPL
)
τ
(µ
s)c
τ
(µ
s)d
τ (µ
s)e
A homogeneous competitive biotin assay was carried out by
adding free biotin in the range of 10-11 to 10-3 M to a mixture of
probe 1 (6.64 µM) and avidin (1.66 µM) in buffer A solution. After
1 h of incubation, the emission intensity of probe 1 decreased
gradually according to the concentration of free biotin because the
binding of free biotin to avidin (Kd ) ca. 10-15 M) is much stronger
than that of probe 1 (Figure 3). Due to the high emission intensity
of the 1-avidin complex, the linear range for the detection of the
free biotin analyte was increased greatly to 10-6.5-10-10.5 M.
Compared with ionic transition metal probes, the detection limit
of the current system is higher by 2 or 3 orders of magnitude.3-5
In summary, we developed the first phosphorescent sensing
system that can overcome intrinsic limitations in the sensitivity of
the previous biotin-avidin assays. The neutral sensing system for
biotin-avidin assays offers remarkable sensitivity over traditional
transition metal based probes, due to the intramolecular energy
transfer and increased hydrophobicity associated with the avidin
binding site and neutral probe 1, and can be used as a homogeneous
competitive assay for biotin. New biomolecule probe systems can
be produced if biotin is replaced with other recognition elements
for various biomolecules.
1
2
CH2Cl2
CH3CN
H2Oa
CH2Cl2
CH3CN
H2Oa
472, 519 (0.28)
473, 498 (0.14)
474, 505 (0.01)
469, 496 (0.10)
472, 493 (0.03)
463, 501 (0.01)
1.01
0.49
0.28
0.92
0.45
0.26
0.56
0.49
0.28
0.25
a pH 7.5, buffer A solution (H2O/DMSO ) 9:1). bQuantum yield was
c
measured using FIrpic (ΦPL)0.42) as a reference. [1] ) [2] ) 6.64 µM,
[avidin] ) 0 µM. d[1] ) [2] ) 6.64 µM, [avidin] ) 1.66 µM. e[1] ) [2] )
6.64 µM, [avidin] ) 1.66 µM, [biotin] ) 166 µM.
Acknowledgment. We thank the SSDIP and Seoul R&BD for
their financial support. BK 21 fellowship grants were provided to
T.-H.K. and J.K.
Figure 3. Homogeneous competitive assay for biotin using probe 1 (6.64
µM) and avidin (1.66 µM). The emission intensity was measured at 472
nm.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
spectral data, UV and PL data, measurement of ET efficiency, and
titration data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
donor (mCP unit) absorption peak (310 nm), compared with that
of compound 2 (V) without an energy donor upon 4:1 binding with
avidin when excited at the MLCT region (380 nm) (Figure 2).
Furthermore, the emission intensity of the probe 1-avidin complex
dramatically increases with increasing concentration of probe 1 until
it fully binds to avidin and is ca. 4-fold higher than that of probe
1 itself (II) when excited at 310 nm. At over 4 equiv, the slope of
the probe 1-avidin complex (I) becomes similar to that of probe
1 (II) without avidin. This means that the increase in emission with
more than 4 equiv of probe 1 just reflects the increase in the probe
concentration. Therefore, a nonspecific interaction between the free
probes and the protein surface can be excluded.4b,7 Compound 8
without a biotin moiety9 showed no increase in emission intensity
in the presence of avidin (Figure S9).
In contrast, the luminescence titration with probe 2 shows that
the emission intensity of the probe 2-avidin complex (V) is ca.
1.6 times that of probe 2 in the absence of avidin (VI).9 The
emission intensity of probe 1 (II) excited at 310 nm was significantly
larger than that of probe 2 (VI) excited at 380 nm and increased
with increasing concentration of the probe due to intramolecular
energy transfer. This indicates that intramolecular energy transfer
References
(1) (a) Wilchek, M.; Bayer, E. A. Methods of Enzymology; Academic Press:
San Diego, CA, 1990; Vol. 184. (b) Hermanson, G. T. Bioconjugate
Techniques; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1996.
(2) (a) Gorman, E. V.; Rothenberg, J. M.; Baker, E. A.; Wilcheck, M. Methods
Enzymol. 1990, 184, 217. (b) Barbarakis, M. S.; Qaisi, W. G.; Daunert,
S.; Bachas, L. G. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 457. (c) Haddour, N.; Cosnier,
S.; Gondran, C.; Chem. Commun. 2004, 2472.
(3) Lo, K. K.-W.; Hui, W.-K.; Chung, C.-K.; Tsang, K. H.-K.; Lee, T. K.-
M.; Li, C.-K.; Lau, J. S.-Y.; Ng, D. C.-M. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2006, 250,
1724.
(4) (a) Lo, K. K.-W.; Hui, W.-K.; Ng, D. C.-M.; Cheung, K.-K. Inorg. Chem.
2002, 41, 40. (b) Lo, K. K.-W.; Hui, W.-K.; Ng, D. C.-M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 9344. (c) Slim, M.; Sleiman, H. F. Bioconjugate Chem.
2004, 15, 949. (d) Lo, K. K.-W.; Tsang, K. H.-K.; Sze, K.-S. Inorg. Chem.
2006, 45, 1714.
(5) (a) Lo, K. K.-W.; Ng, D. C.-M.; Chung, C.-K. Organometallics 2001,
20, 4999. (b) Lo, K. K.-W.; Chung, C.-K.; Ng, D. C.-M.; Zhu, N. New J.
Chem. 2002, 26, 81. (c) Lo, K. K.-W.; Chan, J. S.-W.; Lui, L.-H.; Chung,
C.-K. Organometallics 2004, 23, 3108.
(6) Wong, K. M.-C.; Tang, W.-S.; Chu, B. W.-K.; Zhu, N.; Yam, V. W.-W.
Organometallics, 2004, 23, 3459.
(7) Kim, T. W.; Yoon, H. Y.; Park, J.-h.; Kwon, O.-H.; Jang, D.-J.; Hong,
J.-I. Org. Lett, 2005, 7, 111.
can be an effective method for increasing the sensitivity (ΦET
>
(8) (a) Holmes, R. J.; Forrest, S. R.; Tung, Y.-J.; Kwong, R. C.; Brown, J. J.;
Garon, S.; Thompson, M. E. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 2422. (b)
Lammansky, S.; Djurovich, P.; Murphy, D.; Abdel-Razzaq, F.; Lee, H.-
E.; Adachi, C.; Burrows, P. E.; Forrest, S. R.; Thompson, M. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4304.
74%, in avidin + 1).9 In addition, as shown in the Supporting
Information, the emission intensity of probe 1 (IV) in the presence
of avidin was much lower when excited at 380 nm (MLCT region
of FIrpic) compared to 310 nm (I).9 The lifetime of probes 1 and
2 in the presence of avidin was elongated ca. 2.0- and 1.9-fold,
respectively, due to the hydrophobic environment of the biotin
binding sites of avidin (Table 1). This was supported by the fact
that the lifetimes of probes 1 and 2 decrease with increasing solvent
polarity (Table 1). The addition of excess biotin to a 1:4 mixture
of avidin and probe 1 (or 2) restored the original lifetime of probe
1 (or 2) before complexation. Therefore, the increase in emission
intensity results from intramolecular energy transfer and the
hydrophobicity associated with the binding sites of avidin. There-
(9) See the Supporting Information.
(10) Kwon, T.-H.; Kim, M. K.; Kwon, J.; Shin, D.-Y.; Park, S. J.; Lee, C.-L.;
Kim, J.-J.; Hong, J.-I. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 3673.
(11) The singlet-singlet intramolecular energy transfer in 1 from mCP to FIrpic
exhibits a high efficiency of 92% via the transient PL method.9,10
(12) The triplet-triplet energy transfer efficiency of 1 was estimated to be
99% via the transient PL method.9,10
(13) Due to the solubility problem of probes 1 and 2 in aqueous solvent, H2O/
DMSO (9:1, v/v) was used in all the titrations.
(14) Wang, Z.-X.; Kumar, N.R.; Srivastava, D. K. Anal. Biochem. 1992, 206,
376.
JA710803P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 12, 2008 3727