R
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONSV
5
in 15 min yield product 7 in 92% (entries 8). We have analyzed the model reaction at
lower amounts of a catalyst under the solvent-free condition at temperature 70 ꢀC,
increased the yield compared to previous entries. In furthered optimization, we were
decreased catalyst lodging (30 mg), (20 mg), and (10 mg), product 7 yield in 96, 96, and
65%, respectively (entries 9, 10, and 11). With decreasing, catalyst lodging (20 mg) in
(entries 10) obtained the optimized condition for catalyst lodging. In fathered optimiza-
tion, we were carried out with different polar and nonpolar solvent H2O, EtOH,
MeOH, DCM, CHCl3, and Toluene with (30 mg of catalyst) product 7 yield in 70, 92,
88, 86, 85, and 82%, respectively (entries 12–17). Using different solvents, we cannot
find any change in increasing product yield. Among the tested conditions results shows
that 20 mg of CTSA and solvent-free condition in 15 min is the more appropriate condi-
tion for this reaction (entries 10).
This set of experiments allowed reliable determination of the optimal reaction conditions;
thus, we proceeded to explore the scope of the new procedure with respect to changes in the
aryl unit with 3-methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone and it is shown in Scheme 2.
A range of electron-rich and electron-poor aromatic aldehyde substrates was tested,
as well as some of their heterocyclic derivatives. Thus, benzaldehyde treated with 3-
methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone in standard condition to lead 1 in 93% yield. This reac-
tion also gave an excellent 91% yield when performed on a gram-scale. This experiment
demonstrated the scalability and efficiency of our procedure. 4-Methylbenzaldehyde and
2,4-dimethylbenzaldehyde treated with 3-methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone 92 and 86%
yields were obtained for 2 and 3, respectively. The sterically hindered methyl group in
2,4-dimethylbenzaldehyde it slightly affects the yield in 3 as compared to 4-methylben-
zaldehyde product 2. The [1,10-biphenyl]-4-carbaldehyde in an excellent 90% yield
to get 4. In the same way, the 4-methoxybenzaldehyde treated with 3-methyl-1-phenyl-
5-pyrazolone in standard condition to result in product 5. This set of experiments high-
light the efficacy of our protocol applied to electron-rich aromatic aldehyde
derivatives. The further scope of the reaction was tested with different electron-with-
drawing aromatic aldehyde derivatives. 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde treated with 3-methyl-1-
phenyl-5-pyrazolone in standard condition to lead 6 in 93% yield. The 4-chlorobenzal-
dehyde and 4-bromobenzaldehyde treated with 3-methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone 96 and
89% yields were obtained for 7 and 8, respectively. Aryl aldehyde at the free –OH,
highly sterically hindered and heterocyclic aryl aldehyde groups were explored. Thereby,
the –OH, derivative yielded the corresponding product 9 in 82% yield. The presence of
a free –OH group allowed the reaction. 2,4,6-Trichlorobenzaldehyde treated with 3-
methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone in standard condition to lead 10 in 85% yield. The prod-
uct is obtained highly sterically with good yield. The presence of a heterocyclic group
allowed the reaction to obtain 11 to proceed in 79% yield. These tests demonstrate the
excellent reactivity of CTSA which provided good yields for electron windrowing,
donating, sterically hindered, and heterocyclic aryl aldehyde led into the product cor-
roborating our hypothesis. Thus, we denied that electron-withdrawing substituents at
the para and ortho position concerning the electron-donating also not affect the yield.
These results clearly outline the scope and limitations of our protocol. Also, all com-
pounds, we were recrystallized in ethanol and recovered the catalyst while filtration and
reused for the next reactions.