A R T I C L E S
Edson et al.
Results and Discussion
Phenoxyimine Polymerization Catalysts. Because of their
close structural relationship to PKI catalysts, a brief discussion
of the polymerization behavior of PHI catalysts would be
beneficial. Bis(phenoxyimine)titanium dichloride complexes
were originally explored for the polymerization of ethylene.30
When activated with MAO, these catalysts displayed high
ethylene polymerization activities which prompted a more
detailed investigation of this class of catalyst. In our laboratory,
a pooled, combinatorial approach was used to develop a library
of related complexes and from this was identified a catalyst
capable of syndioselective propylene polymerization.20 Further
elaboration of the ligand framework showed that incorporation
of ortho-fluorine substituents on the N-aryl moiety resulted in
living and highly syndioselective propylene polymerization.21,24
Catalysts bearing meta- and para-fluorine substituents on the
N-aryl moiety exhibited high activity, but were not living for
propylene31 or ethylene polymerization.22 Although isoselective
polymerization of propylene would be expected from a C2-
symmetric catalyst precursor,3 the polypropylene produced
by the PHI catalysts is actually syndiotactic. The highly
syndioselective polymerization of propylene via chain-end
control proceeds with prevailing secondary (2,1) monomer
insertion.20,32-35 It is this highly unusual secondary insertion
mode that causes fluxional isomerization of the octahedral sites
between successive monomer insertions.20,25,26 Quantum me-
chanical/molecular mechanical calculations performed on these
catalysts predict high isoselectivity for propylene polymerization
if the insertion rate is much faster than catalyst isomerization.25
Complexes with ligand structures that could possibly prevent
catalyst isomerization have been developed. For example,
zirconium dichloride complexes bearing binaphthyl-bridged
Schiff-base PHI ligands were prepared by Pellecchia and co-
workers.36 When activated with Bu3Al/MAO or with Bu3Al//
[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4], these catalysts yielded high molecular weight,
atactic polypropylene. In the absence of triisobutylaluminum,
low olefin polymerization activity was observed. Interestingly,
isotactic polymers were obtained under similar conditions from
the polymerization of 1-butene, 1-pentene, and 1-hexene.
Analogous titanium catalysts yielded mostly aPP with small
fractions (ca. 10 wt %) of iPP ([mm] ) 95%), while complexes
bearing a methyl group adjacent to the imine functionality on
the phenolate ring resulted in the formation of moderately
isotactic PP ([mm] ) 75%).37 In all cases, it appears that reaction
between the ligand and the alkylaluminum present in the
activation cocktail results in the in situ reduction of the
imine functionality, leading to multiple active species
Figure 2. Phenoxyimine polymerization catalysts.
syndiotactic polypropylene (sPP) in a living manner when
activated with MAO.21,24 The syndioselectivity is a result of
chain-end control. These catalysts are C2-symmetric in the solid
state and in solution, and are therefore expected to provide
isotactic polymer via a site-control mechanism. However, a
proposed catalyst isomerization event that occurs between each
successive monomer insertion overrides the expected site control
and leads to the unexpected syndioselectivity that is ob-
served.20,25,26 As the ortho substituent on the phenolate moiety
decreases in size, the syndioselectivity of propylene polymer-
ization decreases.27 Using zirconium or hafnium PHI complexes,
Fujita and co-workers were able to generate iPP when iBu3Al/
[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] was employed as the activator.28 Under these
conditions, the PHI ligands react with the aluminum cocatalyst
in situ to generate a new phenoxyamido complex. Activation
with MAO22 results in the formation of regioirregular, atactic
polypropylene. Our group has reported a series of phenox-
yketimine (PKI) titanium complexes bearing bulky tBu groups
at the ortho position of the phenolate ring, which are living for
ethylene polymerization when activated with MAO.29 These
catalysts were sparingly active for propylene polymerization.
However, decreasing the steric demand at the ortho position of
the phenolate ring and employing the N-pentafluorophenyl
moiety leads to living and moderately isoselective propylene
polymerization.18
i
i
We have extensively explored the PKI ligand design space
in search of a catalyst capable of polymerizing propylene in a
living and highly isoselective manner. In the course of our
exploration, we found that 12/MAO (Scheme 1) was the most
isoselective PKI catalyst reported to date. Employing this
catalyst, we prepared a number of unique block copolymers
including an iPP-block-PEP-block-iPP triblock copolymer, iPP-
block-PEP-block-iPP-block-PEP-block-iPP pentablock copoly-
mer, and iPP-block-PEP-block-iPP-block-PEP-block-iPP-block-
PEP-block-iPP heptablock copolymer. Mechanical testing revealed
that each of these polymers displayed good elastomeric proper-
ties.
and
broad
molecular
weight
distributions.
This
(30) Matsui, S.; Tohi, Y.; Mitani, M.; Saito, J.; Makio, H.; Tanaka, H.; Nitabaru,
M.; Nakano, T.; Fujita, T. Chem. Lett. 1999, 1065-1066.
(31) Mason, A. F.; Tian, J.; Hustad, P. D.; Lobkovsky, E. B.; Coates, G. W.
Isr. J. Chem. 2002, 42, 301-306.
(24) Tian, J.; Hustad, P. D.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5134-
5135.
(32) Saito, J.; Mitani, M.; Onda, M.; Mohri, J. I.; Ishi, J. I.; Yoshida, Y.; Nakano,
T.; Tanaka, H.; Matsugi, T.; Kojoh, S. I.; Kashiwa, N.; Fujita, T. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 1072-1075.
(25) Milano, G.; Cavallo, L.; Guerra, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13368-
13369.
(26) Corradini, P.; Guerra, G.; Cavallo, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 231-
241.
(33) Hustad, P. D.; Tian, J.; Coates, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3614-
3621.
(27) Mitani, M.; Furuyama, R.; Mohri, J.; Saito, J.; Ishii, S.; Terao, H.; Nakano,
T.; Tanaka, H.; Fujita, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4293-4305.
(28) (a) Saito, J.; Onda, M.; Matsui, S.; Mitani, M.; Furuyama, R.; Tanaka, H.;
Fujita, T. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2002, 23, 1118-1123. (b) Prasad,
A. V.; Makio, H.; Saito, J.; Onda, M.; Fujita, T. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33,
250-251.
(34) Lamberti, M.; Pappalardo, D.; Zambelli, A.; Pellecchia, C. Macromolecules
2002, 35, 658-663.
(35) Talarico, G.; Busico, V.; Cavallo, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7172-
7173.
(36) Lamberti, M.; Consolmagno, M.; Mazzeo, M.; Pellecchia, C. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 1866-1871.
(37) Strianese, M.; Lamberti, M.; Mazzeo, M.; Tedesco, C.; Pellecchia, C. J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 258, 284-291.
(29) Reinartz, S.; Mason, A. F.; Lobkovsky, E. B.; Coates, G. W. Organome-
tallics 2003, 22, 2542-2544.
9
4970 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 14, 2008