C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. Scanning electron micrographs of poly-NIPAAm patterned on
MWNT forests via polymerization initiator azide 4. Dark areas represent
polymer region. (a) Polymerized background with isolated unmodified
regions. (b) Unmodified background with patterned regions of polymer.
Figure 4. Superhydrophilic patterns on superhydrophobic backgrounds:
(a) a macrochannel. (b) Dark field image of selective condensation on
micropatterned hydrophilic regions.
To determine if modification was a result of grafting from the
nanotube surface, a forest was coated in 4 and half of the substrate
was masked during UV exposure. In contrast to the exposed region,
no distinctive signals were observed in the FTIR spectrum of the
masked region. Furthermore, no polymer decomposition was
observed by thermogravimetric analysis (see Supporting Informa-
tion). These results indicated that a surface-initiated polymerization
was enabled by the phototriggered attachment of azide initiator 4.
Using appropriate photomasks, we prepared substrates with isolated
polymerized features as small as 5 µm, as well as a polymerized
background with isolated pristine regions as small as 60 µm (Figure
3).
4b). This specialized surface effectively serves as a synthetic mimic
to the back of the Stenocara beetle of the Namib desert.12 To the
best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a stable
superhydrophobic surface with hydrophilic features of less than 100
µm.
In conclusion, we have developed a simple patterning method
for the functionalization of CNT forests. The nanoscale roughness
of the forest template was utilized to make superhydrophilic patterns
on a superhydrophobic background. Ongoing work in our labora-
tories is directed toward fabricating advanced materials by coupling
the optical and/or electrical properties of aligned CNTs to chemical
modification.
The exact site of functionalization had to be clarified because
of the likely presence of amorphous carbon on the forest substrates.
To ensure that CNTs can be functionalized under our treatment
conditions, we prepared bucky paper from HiPCO SWCNTs. The
static CA of the paper increased from 68 to 110° after treatment
with 3. Further evidence for covalent attachment was provided by
Raman spectroscopy. After modification, an increase in the D band
intensity (ID) occurred with a concomitant decrease in the G band
intensity (IG) (see Supporting Information). The observed increase
in the ID/IG ratio is indicative of an incorporation of defect sites in
the nanotube lattice.3A second treatment with 3 resulted in a further
increase in the ID/IG ratio, indicating that additional modification
of the substrate occurred.
The ability to increase the extent of functionalization by a second
treatment suggested that different azides could be used to further
tailor or alter the surface properties of forest substrates. This was
demonstrated by reversal of the surface energy of a forest template.
Superhydrophilic samples produced after modification with 2
became superhydrophobic by a subsequent treatment with 3. This
overriding of hydrophilicity is attributed to the significantly longer
length of the fluoroalkyl chain in 3, relative to the hydroxyl chain
in 2. Considerable attention has been paid to developing surfaces
with differential wettability.10 However, only a few examples of
stable patterned superhydrophilic-superhydrophobic surfaces have
been reported.11 The ability of 3 to override 2 allowed the fabrication
of superhydrophobic substrates with hydrophilic regions in two
simple steps: (i) blanket modification with 2; and (ii) treatment
with 3 followed by irradiation through an appropriate photomask.
Figure 4a demonstrates the wetting characteristics of a prepared
macrochannel. Water was effectively confined to the hydrophilic
region of the substrate by the superhydrophobic background.
Droplets that landed on the superhydrophobic region rolled either
off the substrate or into the hydrophilic channel. The macropatterned
films remained stable for at least 1 month. A micropatterned
substrate was also prepared using a quartz mask with 80 µm squares.
A microdroplet array was produced from selective condensation
of water vapor in the hydrophilic regions of the surface (Figure
Acknowledgment. The authors acknowledge financial support
from the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials
Sciences and Engineering, of the U.S. Department of Energy
contract DE-AC02-05CH11231. We thank NIH (fellowship to
S.J.P.), Intel (fellowship to M.R.), DOD (NDSEG fellowship to
B.K.) and the Miller Foundation for a Miller Professorship to A.Z.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectroscopic data for starting materials and products. This material is
References
(1) (a) Watts, P. C. P.; Lyth, S. M.; Mendoza, E.; Silva, S. R. P. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 2006, 89, 103113. (b) Chakrapani, N.; Wei, B.; Carrillo, A.; Ajayan,
P. M.; Kane, R. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 4009-4012.
(2) Wang, K.; Dai, H.; Fishman, H. A.; Harris, J. S. Proc. SPIE 2005, 5718,
22-29.
(3) (a) Holzinger, M.; Abraham, J.; Whelan, P.; Graupner, R.; Ley, L.;
Hennrich, F.; Kappes, M.; Hirsch, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8566-
8580. (b) Holzinger, M.; Vostrowsky, O.; Hirsch, A.; Hennrich, F.; Kappes,
M.; Weiss, R.; Jellen, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4002-4005.
(4) (a) Moghaddam, M. J.; Taylor, S.; Gao, M.; Huang, S.; Dai, L.; McCall,
M. J. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 89-93. (b) Lee, K. M.; Li, L.; Dai, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4122-4123.
(5) (a) Keana, J. F. W.; Cai, S. J. X. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3640-3647.
(b) Cai, S. X.; Nabity, J. C.; Wybourne, M. N.; Keana, J. F. W. Chem.
Mater. 1990, 2, 631-633.
(6) Feng, X.; Jiang, L. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 3063-3068.
(7) (a) Lau, K. K. S.; Bico, J.; Teo, K. B. K.; Chhowalla, M.; Amaratunga,
G. A. J.; Milne, W. I.; McKinely, G. H.; Gleason, K. K. Nano Lett. 2003,
3, 1701-1705. (b) Li, H.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Jiang, L.;
Zhu, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1743-1746.
(8) Matyjaszewski, K.; Xia, J. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 2921-2990.
(9) Sun, T.; Liu, H.; Song, W.; Wang, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, D. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4663-4666.
(10) Representative examples: (a) Lopez, G. P.; Biebuyck, H. A.; Frisbie, C.
D.; Whitesides, G. M. Science 1993, 260, 647-649. (b) Sun, T.; Wang,
G.; Liu, H.; Feng, L.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
14996-14997.
(11) (a) Zhai, L.; Berg, M. C.; Cebeci, F. C.; Kim, Y.; Milwild, J. M.; Rubner,
M. F.; Cohen, R. E. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 1213-1217. (b) Garrod, R. P.;
Harris, L. G.; Schofield, W. C. E.; McGettrick, J.; Ward, L. J.; Teare, D.
O. H.; Badyal, J. P. S. Langmuir 2007, 23, 689-693.
(12) Parker, A. R.; Lawrence, C. R. Nature 2001, 414, 33.
JA8003446
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 13, 2008 4239