A. V. Ramani et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 2764–2767
2767
The most potent compound 17 was selected and assessed for its
Acknowledgment
basic pharmacokinetic parameters after oral (50 mg/kg body
weight) and intravenous administration (10 mg/kg body weight)
in male Wistar rats.13 The oral formulation constituted of a suspen-
sion of drug in 0.25% sodium CMC and Tween 80. The formulation
for intravenous administration was prepared with 20% propylene
glycol, 10% cremophore ELP, 20% N-Methylpyrrolidone in normal
saline. Plasma samples were analyzed using reverse phase HPLC
(Perkin Elmer LC system equipped with Flexar quaternary pump
along with peltier controlled Flexar auto-sampler and Flexar PDA)
The authors are thankful to the Indian Council of Medical
Research [58/34/2008-BMS], Government of India, for their finan-
cial assistance.
References and notes
1. Valadas, E.; Antunes, F. Eur. J. Radiol. 2005, 55, 154.
2. World Health Organization, 2011/2012 Tuberculosis Global Facts, Geneva,
Switzerland (2011).
3. Manjashetty, T. H.; Yogeeswari, P.; Sriram, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21,
2125.
4. Pedro, E.; Silva, A. D.; Ramosa, D. F.; Bonacorso, H. G.; Iglesia, A. I.; Oliveira, M.
R.; Coelho, T.; Navarini, J.; Morbidoni, H. R.; Zanatta, N.; Martins, M. A. P. Int. J.
Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 32, 139.
on Brownlee Analytical C18 column (4.6 Â 150 mm, 3
lm, Perkin
Elmer Corporation, U.S.A) column. The mobile phase used is a mix-
ture of 0.01 M ammonium acetate (pH 4.5) and acetonitrile mixture
(62:38, v/v) delivered at 1 mL/min. Plasma concentration time data
of the analyte were analyzed by non-compartmental method using
WinNonlin Version 5.1 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA).
5. Sriram, D.; Yogeeswari, P.; Madhu, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15,
4502.
6. Sriram, D.; Yogeeswari, P.; Madhu, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 876.
7. Hearn, M. J.; Cynamon, M. H. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, 185.
8. Arora, S. K.; Sinha, N.; Jain, S.; Upadhyaya, R. S.; Jana, G.; Sinha, R. K.; Ajay, S.
WO2004/026828 A1.
9. Rosanna, M.; Rosaria, O.; Francesca, M.; Maria, G. V. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2002, 46, 294.
The basic pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were half life (t ),
½
elimination rate constant (Kel), mean plasma clearance (CL) and
mean volume of distribution (Vd) as reported in Table 2.14–17 After
a single iv bolus dose of 10 mg/kg body weight, compound 17 had
a t of 1.14 h with moderate clearance (22.48 mL/min/kg) and vol-
½
10. Srivastava, T.; Haq, W.; Katti, S. B. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7619.
11. N-(2-(4-(benzyloxy) phenyl)-4-oxo-1,3-thiazinan-3-yl) isonicotinamide (17):
White solid; mp—189–190; Yield (84%); Anal. Calcd for C23H21N3O3S: C, 65.85;
H, 5.05; N, 10.02. Found: C, 65.89; H, 4.99.; N, 9.97. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl): d
2.79–2.87 (m, 4H, CH2CH2), 5.21 (s, 2H, CH2) 5.80 (s, 1H, CH), 6.8–7.01 (m, 4H,
ArH of phenyl), 7.43–7.54 (m, 5H, ArH of benzyl), 7.91–8.87 (m, 4H, ArH of
pyridyl), 8.3 (s, IH, NH, D2O exchangeable). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d 171.1,
163.9, 158.3, 148.9, 141.1, 138.8, 130.3, 128.2, 127.1, 125.2, 124.1, 120.8,
114.12, 70.1, 63.7, 38.2, 31.5 MS m/z: 419.13 [M+].
12. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Antimycobacterial
susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proposed standard M24-
T. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa., 1995.
13. Ramani, A. V.; Pinaki, S.; Ramesh, M. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2009, 23, 615.
14. Toutain, P. L.; Bousquet-Melou, A. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 2004, 27, 415.
15. Toutain, P. L.; Bousquet-Melou, A. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 2004, 27, 427.
16. Toutain, P. L.; Bousquet-Melou, A. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 2004, 27, 441.
17. Toutain, P. L.; Bousquet-Melou, A. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 2004, 27, 455.
ume of distribution (1.99 L). Oral administration of a single dose of
50 mg/kg body weight showed low oral bioavailability (F = 16.7%)
based on 10 h AUC (5.87 lg h/mL) and Cmax (1.31 lg/mL).
The low systemic bioavailability of the compound can be attrib-
uted to its very poor aqueous solubility in the gastrointestinal flu-
ids, therefore low and delayed absorption. The pharmacokinetic
profile was compared with that of the parent compound isoniazid
(Table 2) from which it can be inferred that the compound 17 had a
low systemic exposure and higher clearance values comparatively.
As (Fig. 2) the levels of compound 17 are much above the MIC
values, a dose–response relationship has to be established. Also,
the bioavailability of the compound 17 has to be enhanced by
improvising the oral formulation.