drawbacks: the preparation of the diamine generally includes
either a palladium C-N coupling or a condensation and
reduction sequence (Scheme 1);8 moreover, purification of
Our preliminary efforts focused on the preparation of 1,3-
dimesitylimidazolinium chloride from N,N′-bis(mesityl)for-
mamidine. The formamidine can act as both substrate and
sacrificial base in the reaction. After optimization, the
reaction led to nearly quantitative, reproducible yields of pure
1,3-dimesitylimidazolinium chloride (Scheme 2) N,N′-bis-
Scheme 1. Common Syntheses of Imidazolinium Salts
Scheme 2
a Yield in parentheses based on a 50% theoretical yield with half of
the substrate considered as a sacrificial base.
the unstable diamine sometimes requires careful chroma-
tography. Unsymmetric imidazolinium salts are especially
challenging synthetic targets due to the introduction of the
differing substituents.9
Recently, Bertrand et al. developed an alternative ret-
rosynthetic disconnection and prepared a range of five-, six-,
and seven-membered imidazolinium salts from the addition
of “di-electrophiles” to lithiated formamidines.10 For ex-
ample, 1,3-dimesitylimidazolinium lithium sulfate was pre-
pared in high yield with 1,3,2-dioxathiolane-2,2-dioxide as
the dielectrophile (eq 2).
(mesityl)formamidine hydrochloride could also be isolated
and easily reverted to the formamidine for future use by
solvation in pyridine and precipitation into water.11
Numerous bases were screened to find an effective
replacement for the sacrifical formamidine. Only diisopro-
pylethylamine (DIPA) was shown to perform well in the
reaction. Bases such as pyridine and triethylamine were too
nucleophilic and reacted preferentially with dichloroethane.
Strong bases such as sodium hydride deprotonated the final
product.
The two methods were both successful in preparing a series
of other imidazolinium chlorides starting from a variety of
anilines (Table 1). In all cases, reactions were completed
neat in 10-20 equiv of dichloroethane and a slight excess
of base. Products were easily purified by removal of excess
dichloroethane, trituration in acetone or hot toluene, and
filtration.
Notably, two challenging unsymmetrical imidazolinium
chlorides were prepared in good yields (entries 5 and 6).
Our synthesis of 1-(2,6-difluorophenyl)-3-(mesityl)imidazo-
linium chloride (entry 5), prepared here in two steps and a
65% overall yield, is a marked improvement over its previous
four-step synthesis.9a This method should allow for the
properties and applications of unsymmetrical NHCs to be
further explored.
In our ongoing efforts, we have found several substrate
limitations. As steric bulk at the N-aryl ortho positions is
increased, the steric hindrance decreases reaction rate, and
longer reaction times are necessary. This is exemplified by
the reaction of N,N′-bis(2-tert-butylphenyl)formamidine,
which only reached 60% conversion after 7 days (entry 4A).
Highly electron-withdrawing N-aryl subsituents also hinder
thereaction;thereactionofN,N′-bis(2,6-trifluoromethylphenyl)
formamidine was unsuccessful. Finally, reaction of a dialkyl
formamidine, N,N′-bis(cyclohexyl)formamidine, gave only
poor yields of the desired product, most likely due to the
increased basicity of dialkyl formamidines.
Following Bertrand’s report, we reasoned that imidazo-
linium chlorides could be more easily prepared directly from
the reaction of formamidines with dichloroethane (DCE) in
the presence of a base. Formamidines are ideal precursors
for the preparation of imidazolinium chlorides because they
are generally prepared in a one-step solvent-free reaction
from materials already utilized in imidazolinium salt syn-
thesis, namely anilines and triethylorthoformate.
Herein, we report this new synthetic strategy for the
preparation of imidazolinium chlorides under solvent-free
reaction conditions and in excellent yields with purification
by simple filtration. This strategy also allows for the
preparation of symmetric imidazolinium chlorides in a one-
step, three-component procedure directly from substituted
anilines.
(8) (a) For recent examples, see: Ritter, T.; Day, M. W.; Grubbs, R. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11788–11789. (b) Stylianides, N.; Danopoulos,
A. A.; Pugh, D.; Hancock, F.; Zanotti-Gerosa, A. Organometallics 2007,
26, 5627–5635. (c) Courchay, F. C.; Sworen, J. C.; Ghiviriga, I.; Abboud,
A.; Wagener, K. B. Organometallics 2006, 25, 6074–6086. (d) Beletskaya,
I. P.; Bessmertnykh, A. G.; Averin, A. D.; Denat, F.; Guilard, R. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 261–280.
(9) (a) Vougioukalakis, G. C.; Grubbs, R. H. Organometallics 2007,
26, 2469–2472. (b) Winkelmann, O.; Linder, D.; Lacuor, J.; Na¨ther, C.;
Lu¨ning, U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 22, 3687–3697.
Further efforts focused on a one-step, three-component
synthesis of commonly utilized symmetric 1,3-diarylimidi-
(10) (a) Jazzar, R.; Liang, H.; Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2006, 691, 3201–3205. (b) Jazzar, R.; Bourg, J.-B.; Dewhurst, R. D.;
Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3492–3499.
(11) Dains, F. B.; Malleis, O. O.; Meyer, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1913,
35, 970–976.
2076
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 10, 2008