Article
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 58, No. 10, 2010 6459
Nε-Glycerinyl-
L-lysine Trifluoroacetate (8). Deprotection and puri-
diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Fluka/Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen,
Germany), TFA (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), Dowex 50W ꢀ 8 (Hþ-
form, 50-100 mesh) (Serva/Boehringer, Ingelheim-Heidelberg, Germany),
fication of 7 was done as described above for compound 4. 8 was obtained
as a colorless glassy foam in quantitative yield after lyophilization. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, D2O): δ [ppm] = 1.25-1.39 (m, 2H), 1.42-1.49 (m,
2H), 1.76-1.95 (m, 2H), 3.15 (t, 3J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.62-3.71 (m, 2H), 3.93
(t, 3J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.07-4.12 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O): δ
[ppm] = 21.6, 28.0, 29.5, 38.6, 53.1, 63.4, 72.4, 172.3, 174.2. HR-MS: m/z
235.1288 (found); m/z 235.1286 (calculated for C9H19O5N2 [M þ H]þ).
Degradation of 1-Deoxyhexo-2,3-diulose. A solution of 1-deoxy-
€
L
-lactic acid (Alfa Aesar, Karlsruhe, Germany), and formic acid (Grussing
GmbH, Filsum, Germany). 1-Deoxy-4,5-O-isopropylidene- -erythro-
hexo-2,3-diulose and 1-deoxy-
-erythro-hexo-2,3-diulose (6), NR-(t-butoxy-
carbonyl)- -lactic
-lysine tert-butyl ester (1) (14), and OR-tetrahydropyranyl-
acid (2) (15) were synthesized according to the literature.
Nr-(t-Butoxycarbonyl)-Nε-(Or-(tetrahydropyranyl)-
D
D
L
L
L
-lactoyl)-L-lysine
tert-Butyl Ester (3). 2 (70 mg, 0.4 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (2 mL)
under argon atmosphere at 0 °C, and HOBt (54 mg, 0.4 mmol) was added.
After 10 min a solution of EDC (80 μL, 0.45 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was
added dropwise. To the stirred solution, 1 (120 mg, 0.4 mmol) dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (1 mL) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was warmed to
room temperature and stirred overnight. Then, the mixture was diluted
with CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and washed with 15 mL each of saturated NaHCO3
solution and brine. The organic layer was dried over MgSO4, and the
solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified
by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using EtOAc-hexane (1:1).
Fractions containing 3 (TLC: Rf 0.83 in EtOAc, ninhydrin detection) were
collectively concentrated in vacuo to afford compound 3 as a yellow viscous
oil (90 mg, 49%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 1.42-1.82 (m,
12 H), 1.31 (d, 3J= 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 1.39 (s, 9H), 3.13-3.24(m, 2H),
3.41-3.49 and 3.75-3.86 (m, 2H), 4.02-4.18 (m, 2H), 4.52-4.57 (m, 1H).
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 17.9, 19.6/19.9, 20.4/22.6, 25.1/
25.2, 28.0, 28.4, 29.3/29.4, 31.0, 32.5, 38.6, 53.7/53.8, 62.8/64.0, 73.3/74.3, 79.5,
81.7, 98.4/98.9, 155.4, 171.7/171.8, 173.0/173.3. HR-MS: m/z 481.2884
(found); m/z 481.2886 (calculated for C23H42O7N2Na [M þ Na]þ).
4,5-O-isopropylidene-D-erythro-hexo-2,3-diulose (0.35 mmol) in water
(3 mL) was stirred with Dowex 50W ꢀ 8 (Hþ-form, 50-100 mesh, 4 mL)
for 4 h under argon atmosphere. The resin was filtered off and washed
with MeOH (3 ꢀ 2 mL). After evaporation of the combined solvents, the
residue was dissolved in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4, 4.2 mL). Aliquots
(150 μL) of this solution and a solution of NR-t-BOC-lysine (0.35 mmol) in
phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4, 4.2 mL) were mixed in screw-cap vials
giving an incubation solution of 1-DG and NR-t-BOC-lysine (42 mM,
respectively). Incubation solutions were shaken at 37 °C, and samples were
taken over time.
Amides were analyzed by HPLC-MS2 after deprotection of the BOC
group. Lactic and glyceric acid were analyzed by GC-MS after silylation,
acetic acid by GC-FID as its decylchloroformate derivative and formic
acid by enzymatic determination. Each sample was prepared at least three
times.
Deaerated Incubations. Degradation of 1-deoxy-D-erythro-hexo-2,3-
diulose under deaerated conditions was carried out using phosphate buffer
with 1 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. Buffer was degassed with
helium before samples were prepared; samples were deaerated with argon
before incubation.
Nε-
L-Lactoyl-L-lysine Trifluoroacetate (4). To 3 (66 mg, 0.14 mmol)
Deprotection Reaction of the Amides. To aliquots (100 μL) of the
incubation solutions 6 M HCl (100 μL) was added, and samples were kept
at room temperature for 30 min. Solutions were diluted on a scale of 1:100
with water prior to injection into the HPLC-MS2 system.
Control Experiment. Carboxylic acids (acetic acid, lactic acid, gly-
ceric acid and formic acid, 13 mM, respectively) were separately incubated
with NR-t-BOC-lysine (42 mM) in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4).
Incubation solutions were shaken at 37 °C, and samples were taken after
7 days. Further workup was performed analogous to the amide samples
prior to injection into the HPLC-MS2 system.
Derivatization Reactions for the Carboxylic Acids. Trimethylsilyl
Derivatives of Lactic Acid and Glyceric Acid. Adopting the method
described in ref 16, aliquots of the samples (50 μL) were dried in vacuo,
residues were dissolved in pyridine (50 μL), and N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)-
acetamide with 5% trimethylchlorosilane (50 μL) was added. Samples
were kept 3 h at room temperature prior to injection into the GC-MS
system. Quantification was carried out by comparison of peak areas
obtained in the TIC with those of standard solutions containing known
amounts of the pure authentic reference compounds. Signals of target
compounds were standardized using the signal of silylated phosphoric acid
present in all samples. Data for silylated compounds obtained by GC-MS
showed standard deviations of <5 mmol/mol 1-DG, resulting in coeffi-
cients of variation <5%.
a solution of 25% thioanisole in TFA (8 mL) was added. The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h under argon atmosphere
while the color of the solution changed from green to brown. The mixture
was concentrated in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned between 20 mL
each of diethyl ether and water. The organic layer was further extracted
with water (10 mL). The combined aqueous layers were concentrated
under reduced pressure to a final volume of 3 mL. The crude product was
purified by column chromatography (Lichroprep RP C18 material). The
column was pre-equilibrated with methanol (50 mL) followed by 0.1%
TFA in water (50 mL). The product was eluted with 0.1% TFA in water.
Fractions containing 4 (positive ninhydrin stain) were collectively lyophi-
lized to give a colorless glassy foam in quantitative yield. 1H NMR
3
(400 MHz, D2O): δ [ppm] = 1.23 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.25-1.40 (m,
2H), 1.42-1.52 (m, 2H), 1.75-1.95 (m, 2H), 3.09-3.16 (m, 2H), 3.90-3.95
(m, 1H), 4.10 (q, 3J = 6.6 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O): δ = 19.8,
21.6, 28.0, 29.5, 38.4, 53.0, 67.8, 172.2, 177.4. HR-MS: m/z 219.1339
(found); m/z 219.1335 (calculated for C9H19O4N2 [M þ H]þ).
2,3-O-Isopropylidene-glyceric Acid (6). To a solution of KOH
(95 mg, 1.7 mmol) in 250 μL of water and 500 μL of absolute EtOH,
2,3-O-isopropylidene-D-glyceric acid methyl ester (5) (160 mg, 1 mmol)
was added. The reaction mixture was stirred 30 min at room temperature.
After adjusting the pH value to 4.3 by using HCl (1 M), solution was
extracted with EtOAc (5 ꢀ 3 mL), and the combined organic layers were
dried (MgSO4) and concentrated to give 62 mg (42%) of a colorless oil. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.48 (s, 3H), 4.14 (dd,
3J = 5.0 and 2J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (dd, 3J = 7.5 and 2J = 8.7 Hz, 1H),
4.60 (dd, 3J = 5.0 and 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 9.54 (br, 1H). 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 25.3, 25.8, 67.2, 73.6, 111.8, 175.8.
Decylchloroformate Derivative of Acetic Acid. Adopting the method
described in ref17, samples (300 μL) were spiked with chlorosuccinic acid
(50 μg) dissolved in water as internal standard, pyridine (40 μL) and
decylchloroformate (50 μL) were added. The mixture was then sonicated
for 10 min. Decyl esters were extracted with hexane, and the organic layer
was analyzed by GC-FID. Quantitative results were obtained by internal
calibration using commercially available acetic acid. Data obtained by
GC-FID showed standard deviations of <10 mmol/mol 1-DG, result-
ing in coefficients of variation <3.5%.
Nr-(t-Butoxycarbonyl)-Nε-2,3-O-isopropylidene-glycerinyl-
L-lysine
tert-Butyl Ester (7). 6 was reacted in an equimolar ratio with HOBt
and 1 and with a 1.1-fold excess of EDC as described above for 3.
Purification was done by column chromatography (silica gel 60, EtOAc-
hexane 1:1). Fractions containing 7 (TLC: Rf 0.87 in EtOAc, ninhydrin
detection) were collectively concentrated in vacuo to afford 7 as a yellow
viscous oil (105 mg, 61%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ [ppm] =
1.24-1.44 (m, 2H), 1.33 (s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 1.40 (s, 9H), 1.42 (s, 3H),
1.46-1.60 (m, 3H), 1.70-1.80 (m, 1H), 3.21 (m, 2H), 4.01 (dd, 3J = 5.4
and 2J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.03-4.13 (m, 1H) 4.21 (dd, 3J = 7.7 and 2J = 8.7
Hz, 1H), 4.40 (dd, 3J = 5.4 and 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): δ [ppm] = 22.5, 25.0, 26.1, 28.0, 28.3, 29.2, 32.5, 38.6, 53.7, 67.7,
75.0, 79.5, 81.7, 110.7, 155.2, 170.9, 171.6. HR-MS: m/z 453.2571 (found);
m/z 453.2570 (calculated for C21H38O7N2Na [M þ Na]þ).
Analytical HPLC-MS2. A Jasco PU-2080 Plus quaternary gradient
pump with degasser and Jasco AS-2057 Plus autosampler (Jasco, Gross-
Umstadt, Germany) were used. Chromatographic separations were per-
formed on a stainless steel column (VYDAC 218TP54, 250 ꢀ 4.6 mm,
RP18, 5 μm, Hesperia, CA) using a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile
phase used consisted of water (solvent A) and MeOH/water (7:3 (v/v),
solvent B). To both solvents (A and B), 1.2 mL/L heptafluorobutyric acid
(HFBA) was added. Samples were injected at 2% B (held 25 min), gradient
then changed to 100% B in 5 min (held 10 min) and then changed to 2% B
in 5 min (held 15 min). Elution of amides (Nε-glycerinyl lysine at 7.0 min,