catalytic enantioselective addition to vinyl sulfones was
reported by Hayashi and consisted of the rhodium-catalyzed
1,4-addition of an aryltitanium species followed by a cine-
substitution leading to the elimination of the sulfonyl group.9
Later, Carretero published a catalytic enantioselective con-
jugate addition of aromatic boronic acids onto ꢀ-mono- and
ꢀ,ꢀ-disubstituted vinyl sulfones with high to excellent yields
and good enantioselectivities.10
sulfones were optimal to generate E,Z-dienes using the
Julia-Kocienski olefination.14 This information, combined
with our background expertise on heteroaryl-substituted
sulfones, led us to study the effect of having a 2-pyridyl-
sulfone as the electron-withdrawing substituent on the
efficiency of the addition. Interestingly, the 2-pyridyl group
allowed the formation of the desired adduct in 10% yield
and 6% ee with Me-DuPHOS(O).
In order to enhance both the reactivity and the enantiose-
lectivity of the system, we screened several chiral phosphines
(Figure 1).15 We first tested the bisphosphine Me-DuPHOS
We recently developed copper-catalyzed additions of
diorganozinc reagents to sp2 centers, such as phosphi-
noylimines11 and nitroalkenes,12 using the hemilabile Me-
DuPHOS(O) (L1) as a chiral ligand. We envisioned extend-
ing this system to vinyl sulfones which could circumvent
the problem of synthesizing enantioenriched ꢀ,ꢀ-dialkylsub-
stituted sulfones with sterically similar substituents. Herein,
we describe the asymmetric copper-catalyzed addition of
diorganozinc reagents to ꢀ-monosubstituted vinyl sulfones.
Initially, we tested our optimized conditions for the
addition of diorganozinc reagents to phosphinoylimines.
However, treating Me and Ph vinyl sulfones 1a and 1b with
diethylzinc and a catalytic amount of copper(I) triflate and
Me-DuPHOS(O) in toluene (eq 1) gave none of the addition
product.
It has been shown, in several copper-catalyzed systems,
that reactivity may be enabled or accelerated by the presence
of a proximal Lewis basic group such as a pyridine moiety
by complexation to the catalyst.13 Furthermore, Carretero
discovered that such a substituent promoted the rhodium-
catalyzed 1,4-addition of boronic acid to vinyl sulfones.
Previously, in our research group, we found that 2-pyridyl
Figure 1. Various chiral phosphines tested.
(L2, Table 1, entry 1), and an improvement in the enanti-
oselectivity was observed compared to its hemilabile equiva-
lent Me-DuPHOS(O). We then turned our attention to
ferrocenyl-type ligands. Josiphos (L3) gave comparable
results to those obtained with Me-DuPHOS(O), whereas
Mandyphos (L4) offered 17% yield and 64% ee (entries 2
and 3). Seeing that P,N-ligands offered promising results,
we studied the impact of ligands L5 and L6 of the same
family. While iPr-PHOX provided very low activity, the
binaphthyl Quinap increased conversions and enantioselec-
tivities (entries 4 and 5). In general, the C2 symmetric
bisphosphine ligands with a binaphthyl scaffold (L7-10)
seemed to afford better yields and enantiomeric excesses.
Best results were achieved with Binap which gave 50% yield
and 89% ee (entry 6).16 The bulkier Tol-Binap ligand (L8)
led to the addition product with similar enantiocontrol but
with a much lower reactivity (entry 7).
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Fuchs, P. L.; Braish, T. F. Chem. ReV. 1986,
86, 903. (b) Simpkins, N. G. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 6951. (c) Forristal, I.
J. Sulfur Chem. 2005, 26, 163. For recent examples, see: (d) Grimaud, L.;
Rotulo, D.; Ros-Perez, R.; Guitry-Azam, L.; Prunet, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 7477. (e) Fahrat, S.; Marek, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
1410. (f) Liza Luis, A.; Krische, M. J. Synlett 2004, 2579.
(9) Yoshida, K.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2872.
(10) (a) Mauleo´n, P.; Carretero, J. C. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3195. (b)
Mauleo´n, P.; Carretero, J. C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4961. (c) Mauleo´n,
P.; Alonso, I.; Rivero, M. R.; Carretero, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
9924.
(11) (a) Boezio, A. A.; Pytkowicz, J.; Coˆte´, A.; Charette, A. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14260. (b) Coˆte´, A.; Boezio, A. A.; Charette, A. B.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5405. (c) Desrosiers, J.-N.; Coˆte´,
A.; Charette, A. B. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6186. (d) Charette, A. B.; Boezio,
A. A.; Coˆte´, A.; Moreau, E.; Pytkowicz, J.; Desrosiers, J.-N.; Legault, C.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1259. (e) Desrosiers, J.-N.; Coˆte´, A.; Boezio,
A. A.; Charette, A. B. Org. Synth. 2006, 83, 5.
(12) Coˆte´, A.; Lindsay, V. N. G.; Charette, A. B. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
85.
(13) (a) Han, H.; Bae, I.; Yoo, E. J.; Lee, J.; Do, Y.; Chang, S. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 4109. (b) Kamei, T.; Fujita, K.; Itami, K.; Yoshida, J.-I. Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 4725. (c) Nakamura, S.; Sano, H.; Nakashima, H.; Kubo, K.;
Shibata, N.; Toru, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5565. For a 2-pyridyl
directed radical addition to vinyl sulfoxides, see: (d) Mase, N.; Watanabe,
Y.; Higuchi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2002, 2134.
(14) Charette, A. B.; Berthelette, C.; St-Martin, D. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 5149.
(15) Carbophos, BDPP, Phanephos, Segphos, Diop, and Chiraphos
ligands all gave e10% conversion.
(16) For a review on Binap, see: Berthod, M.; Mignani, G.; Woodward,
G.; Lemaire, M. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1801.
2316
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008