tor are highly desired,9,10 especially since CB2-selective
ligands should limit the side effects associated with CB1
receptor activation.8,11
available olivetol. A high level of regioselectivity in the
cyclotrimerization step will be induced through a sterically
demanding trimethylsilyl (TMS) group which can subse-
quently be removed in a traceless fashion.
First, the optimal structural features for an efficient and
regioselective [2 + 2 + 2] cyclotrimerization reaction toward
the cannabinoid core structure were delineated by synthesiz-
ing a series of model diynes (10-15) that differed in their
electronic and steric properties (Scheme 2; see the Supporting
Thus far, cannabinol derivatives have primarily been
modified at positions C-1, C-3, and C-9.10,12 Previous
syntheses of cannabinol and its derivatives have relied upon
two general strategies: (1) coupling 5-alkyl resorcinols with
suitably substituted arenes followed by pyran formation13
or (2) generating tetrahydro derivatives first via coupling of
5-alkylresorcinols with appropriate cyclohexane derivatives
followed by pyran formation and/or aromatization.10,12,14
Accessing broadly substituted C-ring analogues would
require more elaborate arene or cyclohexene starting materi-
als. In this paper, we present a flexible synthetic route to
the cannabinol core structure based on a [2 + 2 + 2]
cyclotrimerization reaction15 that is amenable to the synthesis
of various C-ring analogues from easily accessible alkyne
and nitrile precursors.
Scheme 2
.
Investigation of the [2 + 2 + 2] Cyclotrimerization
Key Step of the Diynes 10-15
In order to illustrate the feasibility of a [2 + 2 + 2]
cyclotrimerization approach, we synthesized several natural
cannabinoids including cannabinol (1), cannabinol methyl
ether (2), and cannabinodiol (3). Our synthetic strategy
toward 1-3 is depicted in Scheme 1. We envisioned the
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Cannabinol (1),
Cannabinol Methyl Ether (2), and Cannabinodiol (3)
Information for diyne syntheses). These molecules were
subjected to Ru-catalyzed cyclotrimerization reactions (10
mol % of Cp*Ru(cod)Cl16) with 1-hexyne (10 equiv) under
microwave irradiation17,18 (toluene, 300 W, 10 min, sealed-
vessel). The terminal diyne 1019 delivered the cyclotrimer-
ization product 16 in a 61% yield as a 70:30 regioisomeric
cannabinoids 1-3 being derived from either 6 or 7. In turn,
these tricyclic molecules would be obtained by a regiose-
lective transition-metal-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cyclotrimer-
ization reaction of an appropriately substituted diyne 8 or 9.
These diynes would be readily prepared from commercially
1
mixture of pyrans as determined by GC/MS and H NMR
analysis. The cyclotrimerization reaction of the ester analogue
1120 led to an increased regioselectivity in favor of the isomer
17a over the isomer 17b (76:24 based on 1H NMR analysis)
with a diminished yield of 31%. This result correlates well
with Yamamoto’s findings under nonmicrowave irradiation
conditions.20 The low yields in case of 10 and 11 are a result
of di- and trimerization of the diyne starting material, a
problem commonly seen in cyclotrimerization reactions of
(9) (a) Marriott, K. S.; Huffman, J. W. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8,
187. (b) Pertwee, R. G. Pharmacol. Ther. 1997, 74, 129. (c) Raitio, K. H.;
Salo, O. M.; Nevalainen, T.; Poso, A.; Jarvinen, T. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005,
12, 1217. (d) Huffman, J. W. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2000, 6, 1323
(10) Mahadevan, A.; Siegel, C.; Martin, B. R.; Abood, M. E.; Beletskaya,
I.; Razdan, R. K. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3778
(11) Malan, T. P., Jr.; Ibrahim, M. M.; Deng, H.; Liu, Q.; Mata, H. P.;
Vanderah, T.; Porreca, F.; Makriyannis, A. Pain 2001, 93, 239
(12) Rhee, M. H.; Vogel, Z.; Barg, J.; Bayewitch, M.; Levy, R.; Hanus,
L.; Breuer, A.; Mechoulam, R. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 3228
.
.
.
(16) Yamamoto, Y.; Arakawa, T.; Ogawa, R.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 12143.
.
(17) Young, D. D.; Sripada, L.; Deiters, A. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9,
(13) Hattori, T.; Suzuki, T.; Hayashizaka, N.; Koike, N.; Miyano, S.
Bull. Soc. Chem. Jpn. 1993, 66, 3034.
735.
(18) (a) Zhou, Y.; Porco, J. A.; Snyder, J. K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 393.
(b) Shanmugasundaram, M.; Aguirre, A. L.; Leyva, M.; Quan, B.; Martinez,
L. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7698. (c) Hrdina, R.; Kadlcikova, A.;
Valterova, I.; Hodacova, J.; Kotora, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17,
3185. (d) Saaby, S.; Baxendale, I. R.; Ley, S. V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005,
(14) (a) Meltzer, P. C.; Dalzell, H. C.; Razdan, R. K. Synthesis 1981,
985. (b) Ghosh, R.; Todd, A. R.; Wilkinson, S. J. Chem. Soc. 1940, 1393.
(c) Adams, R.; Baker, B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 2401
.
(15) (a) Chopade, P. R.; Louie, J. AdV. Syn. Catal. 2006, 348, 2307. (b)
Gandon, V.; Aubert, C.; Malacria, M. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2209. (c)
Yamamoto, Y. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 503. (d) Kotha, S.; Brahmachary,
E.; Lahiri, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 4741. (e) Saito, S.; Yamamoto, Y.
Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2901. (f) Schore, N. E., [2 + 2+2] Cycloadditions.
In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Paquette,
L. A., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5, pp 1129.
3, 3365. (e) Efskind, J.; Undheim, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2837
.
(19) Jones, G. B.; Wright, J. M.; Hynd, G.; Wyatt, J. K.; Warner, P. M.;
Huber, R. S.; Li, A.; Kilgore, M. W.; Sticca, R. P.; Pollenz, R. S. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 5727.
(20) Yamamoto, Y.; Kinpara, K.; Saigoku, T.; Nishiyama, H.; Itoh, K.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 1287.
2196
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008