C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Asymmetric Petasis Reaction with Dibenzylamine 7a
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
entry
R1
R2
product
% yieldb
erc
1
2
3
4
5
6
Ph
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
15a
15b
15c
15d
15e
15f
15g
15h
15i
81
84
82
80
82
87
76
73
74
78
71
95.5:4.5
96:4
95:5
95:5
95:5
95:5
97:3
95:5
95.5:4.5
95:5
p-CH3O-C6H4
p-Br-C6H4
m-F-C6H4
m-CF3-C6H4
3-C4H3S
C6H11
n-Bu
BnOCH2
Ph
7d
8d
9d
10
11d
H
CH3
CH3
15j
15k
n-Bu
93:7
were also good coupling partners for the reaction. The reaction of
diamine 18 with boronate 6d and ethyl glyoxylate generated
piperazinone 19 in good yield and er (Scheme 1).8
a Reactions were run with 0.25 mmol 14, 0.25 mmol amine, 0.25 mmol
glyoxylate, 0.0375 mmol (S)-5j, and 3 Å molecular sieves in toluene for 36 h
under Ar, followed by flash chromatography on silica gel. b Isolated yield.
c Determined by chiral HPLC analysis. d Reactions were run at 0 °C.
Mechanistic studies using NMR and ESI-MS analysis of reaction
mixtures at room temperature indicated single ligand exchange
consistent with our previous observations.6d Monitoring the reaction
by 11B NMR demonstrated conversion of a trivalent vinyl boronate
to a tetravalent boronate species at 5.4 ppm consistent with previous
observations.9 Also congruous with observations made by Petasis,2a
aminals 20 and 21 were found to be equally reactive in the reaction
to afford 9 in comparable yield and er’s, whereas the use of
(dibenzylamino)methanol 22 resulted in little product formation
(Scheme 2). These observations highlight the possible intermediacy
of an aminal and the importance of the glyoxylate ester functionality.
In summary, we have developed an enantioselective Petasis
reaction catalyzed by chiral biphenols. Mechanistic studies are
ongoing to facilitate expansion of the scope and utility.
Table 3. Asymmetric Petasis Reaction with Boronate 6da
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by a gift from
Amgen Inc. and the NIH (P50 GM067041 and R01 GM078240).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
HPLC analysis for compounds 15a-15k, 17a-17j, and 19. This
References
(1) (a) Multicomponent Reactions; Zhu, J., Bienayme´, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2005. (b) Yus, M.; Ramo´n, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1602–1634. (c) Do¨mling, A. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 17–89. (d)
Guillena, G.; Ramo´n, D. J.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18,
693–700.
(2) (a) Petasis, N. A.; Akritopoulou, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 583–586.
(b) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 445–446.
(c) Petasis, N. A.; Goodman, A.; Zavialov, I. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53,
16463–16470. (d) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 11798–11799. (e) Petasis, N. A. Aust. J. Chem. 2007, 60, 795–798.
(3) (a) Maruoka, K.; Ooi, T. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 3013–3028. (b) Ma, J.-A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4290–4299. (c) Najera, C.; Sansano, J. M.
Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 4584–4671.
a Reactions were run with 0.25 mmol 6d, 0.25 mmol amine, and 15
mol % of catalyst and 3 Å molecular sieves in toluene for 36 h under
Ar, followed by flash chromatography on silica gel. b Isolated yield.
c Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
(4) (a) Harwood, L. M.; Currie, G. S.; Drew, M. G. B.; Luke, R. W. A. Chem.
Commun. 1996, 1953–1954. (b) Koolmeister, T.; So¨dergren, M.; Scobie,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5969–5970. (c) Nanda, K. K.; Trotter, B. W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2025–2028. (d) Southwood, T. J.; Curry, M. C.;
Hutton, C. A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 236–242.
(5) Yamaoka, Y.; Miyabe, H.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6686–
6687.
(6) (a) Wu, T. R.; Chong, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3244–3245. (b)
Lou, S.; Moquist, P. N.; Schaus, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12660–
12661. (c) Wu, T. R.; Chong, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4908–
4909. (d) Lou, S.; Moquist, P. N.; Schaus, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 15398–15404.
(7) (a) Bao, J.; Wulff, W. D.; Dominy, J. B.; Fumo, M. J.; Grant, E. B.; Rob,
A. C.; Whitcomb, M. C.; Yeung, S.-M.; Ostrander, R. L.; Rheingold, A. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3392–3405. (b) Mitchell, W. D.; Wulff, W. D.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 367–369.
proved equally effective in the reaction (entries 10 and 11). We next
evaluated the scope of secondary amines using the general reaction
conditions (Table 3). Secondary benzyl amines afforded the corre-
sponding R-amino esters in good yield and enantioselectivities (entries
1-6).
Good functional group tolerance was observed with more
complex amines (entries 4-6). The less nucleophilic ethyl aniline
(entry 7) resulted in slightly lower yield and selectivity. Dially-
lamine proved effective in the reaction (entry 8). Both enantiomers
of allyl R-methylbenzylamine were subjected to the (S)-5j-catalyzed
reaction. The R-derived amine resulted in 9:1 dr with (R,R)-17i as
major product (entry 9). With the (S)-amine, the catalyst still
appeared to control the selectivity (84:16 dr, entry 10). Diamines
(8) Petasis, N. A.; Patel, Z. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9607–9611.
(9) (a) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 567–570. (b)
Schlienger, N.; Bryce, M. R.; Hansen, K. T. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 10023–
10030. (c) Wang, Q.; Finn, M. G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4063–4065.
JA8018934
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 22, 2008 6923