Scheme 1
.
Intended Annulation Reaction Using Cyclic
Enamides
Table 1. Yields for the Transformations Leading to
Piperidinones 5a-f
coupling
step (%)
Michael
addition (%)
cyclization
to enamide (%)
R1
R2
H
H
H
OMe
OMe
H
H
Me
CO2Me
H
OMe
OMe
2a(80)
2b(70)
2c(75)
2d(70)
2e(70)
2f (74)
4a(75)
4b(72)
4c(72)
4d(73)
4e(73)
4f (64)
5a(85)
5b(78)
5c(79)
5d(83)
5e(85)
5f (89)
substituted-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-pyridinones, which contain a
cyclic enamide function, enter into a completely different
pathway in presence of a palladium catalyst.
ously,16 the 4-formyl esters provide piperidinones by reduc-
tiveaminationwithbenzylamineandsodiumcyanoborohydride.
If the less powerful reducing agent sodium triacetoxy boro-
hydride was employed, the piperidinones were accompanied
by the cyclic enamide. If the reducing agent was omitted and
the formyl esters were simply reacted with benzylamine in
refluxing dichloroethane, the cyclic enamides 5a-f were the
sole product. The yields for the individual steps of the sequence
shown in Scheme 2 are listed in Table 1.
The required substrates were easily prepared from bro-
moiodobenzenes10–13 1a-f (Scheme 2, Table 1). Via
Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Cyclic Enamides 5a-f via Heck
Coupling, Michael Addition of the Enamines 3a-f to Ethyl
Acrylate and Cyclization of the 4-Formyl Esters 4a-f with
Benzylamine
In an attempt to perform a palladium-catalyzed ring
annulation reaction, the 5-(2-bromobenzyl)-substituted py-
ridinone 5a was stirred with Pd(OAc)2 (0.1 equiv), Ph3P (0.2
equiv), and Cs2CO3 (4 equiv) in hot DMF (Table 2, entry
1). After 24 h, some starting material was left, but two new
compounds 7a and 8a were isolated. The base K2CO3 gave
almost the same results (25% 5a, 21% 7a, 41% 8a). Longer
reaction times (entry 2) also produced some of the debro-
minated pyridinone 6a. The highest yield for the biaryl
compound 8a was obtained by running the reaction at higher
temperature for 48 h (entry 3). Comparable ratios of the three
compounds 6a-8a were obtained using HMPA as solvent
(entry 4). Using binap as ligand, and K2CO3 as base, the
amount of the simple debromination product 6a increased
at the expense of 7a and 8a (entry 5). The sterically hindered
and electronrich Buchwald phosphine ligand N-[2′-(dicyclo-
hexylphosphino)-1,1′-biphenyl-2-yl]-N,N-dimethylamine (dav-
ephos) also favored the debrominated compound 6a (entry
6). Among the dipolar solvents, DMF turned out to be the
best one. In DMSO, the formation of the biaryl compound
is suppressed with the 1,5-dibenzyl-2(1H)-pyridinone (7a)
being the major product (entry 7). The palladium source may
also be varied without significant changes in the product
ratios as illustrated with entries 8 and 9.
Jeffery-Heck coupling14 with allyl alcohol, these aryl
iodides were extended to 3-(2-bromo)phenylpropanals 2a-f.
The obtained aldehydes 2a-f were then converted to the
corresponding enamines using pyrrolidine in presence of
K2CO3. Treatment of the crude enamines with ethyl acrylate
followed by acidic workup furnished the 4-formyl esters
4a-f.15 These modified conditions are a significant improve-
ment over the previously reported ones. As shown previ-
The formation of pyridin-2(1H)-one 7a and the biphenyl-
substituted pyridinone 8a can only be explained by C-H
insertion of the arylpalladium species E into the allylic C-H
bond, yielding palladacycle F (Scheme 3). Via elimination of
(8) (a) For some intramolecular Heck reactions of enamide containing
substrates, see: Ripa, L.; Hallberg, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 595–602.
(b) Padwa, A.; Brodney, M. A.; Lynch, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
1716–1724. (c) Arthuis, M.; Pontikis, R.; Florent, J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 6397–6400.
(9) For the Heck reaction using pyrroles, see: Beck, E. M.; Grimster,
N. P.; Hatley, R.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2528–2529.
(10) (a) Compound 1b: Bard, R. R.; Bunnett, J. F.; Traber, R. P. J.
Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4918–4924. (b) van Klink, G. P. M.; de Boer, H. J. R.;
Schat, G.; Akkerman, O. S.; Bickelhaupt, F.; Spek, A. L. Organometallics
(12) Compound 1d: Kuwabe, S.-i.; Torraca, K. E.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12202–12206.
(13) Compound 1e, 1f: Orito, K.; Hatakeyama, T.; Takeo, M.; Suginome,
H. Synthesis 1995, 127, 3–1277.
(14) (a) Jeffery, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2121–2124. (b) Wolfe,
J. P.; Rennels, R. A.; Buchwald, S. L. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7525–7546.
(c) Tietze, L. F.; Kahle, K.; Raschke, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 401–407.
(d) Bruye`re, D.; Bouyssi, D.; Balme, G. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4007–4017.
(15) Padwa, A.; Brodney, M. A.; Marino, J. P., Jr.; Sheehan, S. M. J.
Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 78–87.
2002, 21, 2119–2135
.
(11) Compound 1c: Vu, C. B.; Corpuz, E. G.; Merry, T. J.; Pradeepan,
S. G.; Bartlett, C.; Bohacek, R. S.; Botfield, M. C.; Eyermann, C. J.; Lynch,
B. A.; MacNeil, I. A.; Ram, M. K.; van Schravendijk, M. R.; Violette, S.;
Sawyer, T. K. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 4088–4098.
2362
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 12, 2008