S. Ito et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 1194–1197
1197
Table 2
References and notes
The CRTH2 inhibitory activities of the benzamide derivatives 13a–b
1. Peters, S. P.; MacGlashan, D. W., Jr.; Schulman, E. S.; Schleimer, R. P.; Hayes, E.
C.; Rokach, J.; Adkinson, N. F., Jr.; Lichtenstein, L. M. J. Immunol. 1984, 132, 1972.
2. Murray, J. J.; Tonnel, A. B.; Brash, A. R.; Roberts, L. J.; Gosset, P.; Workman, R.;
Capron, A.; Oates, J. A. N. Eng. J. Med. 1986, 315, 800.
3. Fujitani, Y.; Kanaoka, Y.; Aritake, K.; Uodome, N.; Okazaki-Hatake, K.; Urade, Y.
J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 443.
O
N
R
HO2
C
O
4. Woodward, D. F.; Hawley, S. B.; Williams, L. S.; Ralston, T. R.; Protzman, C. E.;
Spada, C. S.; Nieves, A. L. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1990, 31, 138.
5. Monneret, G.; Gravel, S.; Diamond, M.; Rokach, J.; Powell, W. S. Blood 2001, 98,
1942.
13a-b
a
a
6. Nagata, K.; Tanaka, K.; Ogawa, K.; Kemmotsu, K.; Imai, T.; Yoshie, O.; Abe, H.;
Tada, K.; Nakamura, M.; Sugamura, K.; Takano, S. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 162, 1278.
7. Hirai, H.; Tanaka, K.; Yoshie, O.; Ogawa, K.; Kenmotsu, K.; Takamori, Y.;
Ichimasa, M.; Sugamura, K.; Nakamura, M.; Takano, S.; Nagata, K. J. Exp. Med.
2001, 193, 255.
Compound
R
Human CRTH2 IC50
(nM)
Guinea pig CRTH2 IC50
(nM)
13a
13b
H
9.7
18
17
OMe 5.5
8. Xue, L.; Gyles, S. L.; Wettey, F. R.; Gazi, L.; Townsend, E.; Hunter, M. G.;
Pettipher, R. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 6531.
a
See Ref. 11 for assay protocol. All values are mean of at least two experiments.
9. Gervais, F. G.; Cruz, R. P. G.; Chateauneuf, A.; Gale, S.; Sawyer, N.; Nantel, F.;
Metters, K. M.; O’Neill, G. P. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001, 108, 982.
10. Pettipher, R.; Hansel, T. T.; Armer, R. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 313.
11. The human or guinea pig CRTH2 stable transfectants were generated by
transfecting the pcDNA3.1 expression vector containing human or guinea pig
CRTH2 gene into HEK293 cells (purchased from ATCC). They were suspended in
binding assay buffer (10 mM BES, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MnCl2, pH 7.0) and
Table 3
Pharmacokinetic parameters of CRTH2 antagonists after p.o. administration to guinea
pigs (10 mg/kg)
Compound
Pharmacokinetic parameters in guinea pigsa
disrupted by strong mixing using the injection needle. Cell suspension (10
protein/well for human CRTH2 assay or 20 g protein/well for guinea pig
CRTH2 assay) and [3H]PGD2 were mixed in
96-well round bottom
lg
l
Cmax
(lg/mL)
AUC (lgꢀh/mL)
a
1a
1b
13b
16d
17
0.84
0.73
0.04
0.50
2.86
5.95
2.40
0.27
1.02
4.85
polypropylene plate (Nunc) and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C in the absence or
the presence of increasing concentrations of the tested compounds. After
incubation, the cell suspension was transferred to a glass-filter plate (GF/B,
Perkin–Elmer). Scintillant was added to the filtration plate, and radioactivity
remaining on the filter was measured with a scintillation counter, TopCount
(Packard Bioscience). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of
a
10 lM DK-PGD2. The concentration of compounds causing a 50% decrease in
See Ref. 13 for assay protocol. All values are mean of n = 3 measurements.
the binding of [3H]PGD2 to the receptor was calculated as [IC50]value.
12. The human DP1 stable transfectants were generated by transfecting the
pcDNA3.1 expression vector containing human DP1 gene into HEK293 cells
(purchased from ATCC). They were suspended in binding assay buffer (10 mM
BES, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MnCl2, pH 7.0) and disrupted by strong mixing using
min/kg) than 1a (120 mL/min/kg). The chain elongated compound
16d showed poorer oral availability than the corresponding lead
1a. In contrast, pyridazinone 17 displayed excellent oral availabil-
ity, and dosing (10 mg/kg) to guinea pigs led to an approximately
the injection needle. Cell suspension (10 lg protein/well for human DP1 assay)
and [3H]PGD2 were mixed in a 96-well round bottom polypropylene plate
(Nunc) and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C in the absence or the presence of
increasing concentrations of the tested compounds. After incubation, the cell
threefold increase in Cmax (2.86
(4.85
gꢀh/mL) to 1a.
lg/mL) and comparable AUC
l
suspension was transferred to
Scintillant was added to the filtration plate, and radioactivity remaining on
the filter was measured with scintillation counter, TopCount (Packard
Bioscience). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10
a glass-filter plate (GF/B, Perkin–Elmer).
Evaluating the inhibitory activity of 17 against human DP1
proved that this compound was a selective CRTH2 antagonist
(IC50 = 5200 nM to human DP1). We next evaluated the in vivo
anti-asthmatic activity of compounds 1a and 17 in a guinea pig
model, and found that both showed in vivo efficacy orally in a gui-
nea pig model of airway hyperresponsiveness,18 with ED50 values
of 4.7 and 0.05 mg/kg u.i.d., respectively. The in vivo efficacy of
17 was thus drastically improved than that of 1a.
a
lM
PGD2. The concentration of compounds causing a 50% decrease in the binding
of [3H]PGD2 to the receptor was calculated as [IC50]value.
13. Male Hartley guinea pigs (6 weeks) were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc.,
(Shizuoka, Japan). Guinea Pigs were fasted overnight prior to dosing. Dosing
solution were prepared as
a 10 mg/mL suspending solution in 0.5% MC
(methylcellulose, COSMO BIO, Tokyo, Japan) in water. Guinea Pigs received
10 mg/kg dose by oral administration. Samples were analyzed in Astellas
Analysis & Pharmacokinetics Research Labs.
In summary, we discovered a novel and selective CRTH2 antag-
onist 1a from HTS of our chemical library. Initial optimization
based on 1a resulted in the discovery of the novel, potent and or-
ally bioavailable CRTH2 antagonist 17. We achieved not only a
improvement in in vitro CRTH2 antagonistic activity against both
human and guinea pig but also a drastic improvement in in vivo
efficacy compared to that of 1a. Further optimization of this series
aimed at improving activities and pharmacokinetic properties will
be reported later.
14. Robarge, M. J.; Bom, D. C.; Tumey, L. N.; Varga, N.; Gleason, E.; Silver, D.; Song,
J.; Murphy, S. M.; Ekema, G.; Doucette, C.; Hanniford, D.; Palmer, M.;
Pawlowski, G.; Danzig, J.; Loftus, M.; Hunady, K.; Sherf, B. A.; Mays, R. W.;
Stricker-Krongrad, A.; Brunden, K. R.; Harrington, J. J.; Bennani, Y. L. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1749.
15. Middlemiss, D.; Ashton, M. R.; Boyd, E. A.; Brookfield, F. A. PCT Int. Appl. WO
044260, 2005.
16. Marriott, J. H.; Barber, A. M. M.; Hardcastle, R.; Rowlands, M. G.; Grimshaw, R.
M.; Neidle, S.; Jarman, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 4265.
17. Smith, D. A.; Jones, B. C.; Walker, D. K. Med. Res. Rev. 1996, 16, 243.
18. Male Hartley guinea pigs were actively sensitized to ovalbumin (OVA) by i.p.
injection of 20 mg in 0.9% saline at day 0, and of 1 mg at day 2. Animals were
exposed for 10 min on days 14–21 to an aerosol of 0.5% OVA solution in 0.9%
saline or saline alone generated from a nebulizer. All animals were treated with
compound by po administration 60 min prior to the aerosol, and with 1 mg/kg
pyrilamine by ip injection 30 min prior to the aerosol. On day 22, animals were
anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg). The trachea was cannulated and the
animal was mechanically ventilated (60 strokes/minutes; 1 mL/100 g body
weight) with a small animal respirator. Pulmonary inflation pressure (PIP) was
monitored with a pressure transducer. Doses of methacholine (0–14 mg/kg)
were administered sequentially at 3-minute intervals to each animal via the
right jugular vein. The area under the peak inflation pressure versus
methacholine dose curve (AUC) was calculated for each animal. The doses of
compounds causing 50% inhibition of the increase in the AUC were calculated
as [ED50] values.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Mr. Yasuhiro Miyao for evaluat-
ing in vivo PK, Dr. David Barrett and Dr. Masaya Orita for their
valuable comments and help in the preparation of the manuscript,
and Mr. Mamoru Tasaki for his preparation of the manuscript con-
cerning the in vitro and in vivo assay method.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in