C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The strong tendency for 2,1-insertion of methyl acrylate into the
Pd-C bond, leading to the head-to-tail structure, was consistent
with density functional theory (DFT) calculations11,13c and experi-
mental observations7a using an R-diimine ligand or 1a. However,
the origin of the difference in regioregularity between methyl
acrylate/CO and vinyl acetate/CO copolymerization is still unclear.
According to the DFT calculation on the R-diimine Pd system by
Goddard and co-workers,11 the preference for 2,1-insertion into a
Pd-C bond over 1,2-insertion is greater for methyl acrylate by 1.2
kcal/mol than for vinyl acetate. Although the energy difference may
suggest a disparity in regioregularity, further studies are necessary
to clarify the difference.
In summary, the first highly regiocontrolled copolymerization
of a polar vinyl monomer with CO is reported, using methyl acrylate
as a comonomer. Further mechanistic investigations by experimental
and computational methods are currently in progress.
Figure 2. Synthesis and molecular structure of 2a. Hydrogen atoms are
omitted. Selected bond distances (Å): Pd(1)-C(21) 2.042(6), Pd(1)-O(8)
2.137(4), Pd(1)-O(3) 2.106(4), Pd(1)-P(1) 2.2163(17).
Acknowledgment. The authors are grateful to Assoc. Prof. Y.
Nishibayashi and Dr. Y. Miyake at the University of Tokyo for
high-resolution FAB-MS analysis of 4a.We also thank Rigaku for
the X-ray crystal analysis of 2a
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization (PDF, CIF). This material is available free of charge
References
(1) Boffa, L. S.; Novak, B. M. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 1479.
(2) Patil, A. O., Schulz, D. N., Novak, B. M., Eds.; Functional Polymers:
Modern Synthetic Methods and NoVel Structures; ACS Symposium Series
704; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1998.
(3) (a) Drent, E.; Budzelaar, P. H. M. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 663. (b) Bianchini,
C.; Meli, A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2002, 225, 35.
(4) Catalytic Synthesis of Alkene-Carbon Monoxide Copolymers and Cooli-
gomers; Sen, A., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The
Netherlands, 2003.
Figure 3. Plausible mechanism of copolymerization of methyl acrylate
with CO catalyzed by (a) 1 and Pd(dba)2 or (b) 2a.
(5) (a) Kacker, S.; Jiang, Z. Z.; Sen, A. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 5852. (b)
Lee, J. T.; Alper, H. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2189.
(6) Kochi, T.; Nakamura, A.; Ida, H.; Nozaki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 7770.
(7) (a) Mecking, S.; Johnson, L. K.; Wang, L.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 888. (b) Sen, A.; Borkar, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007,
692, 3291. See also refs 12a, 13a–c.
To investigate the mechanism of the copolymerization, a five-
membered chelate species (2a) corresponding to C in Scheme 1
was isolated using 1a (Figure 2). Exposure of 3a13b to ambient
CO pressure quantitatively provided acetylpalladium complex 4a.13d
2,1-Inseriton of methyl acrylate into the Pd-C bond of 4a
proceeded in the presence of AgOTf to yield γ-ketoalkylpalladium
complex 2a in 60% yield. No formation of the 1,2-insertion product
was observed. The structure of 2a was determined by NMR and
X-ray crystallography. The Pd-C (2.042(6) Å) and Pd-O (2.137(4)
Å) bond lengths in the five-membered chelate are similar to those
of reported examples of C bearing neutral bidentate ligands (Pd-C,
2.046-2.059 Å; Pd-O, 2.112-2.161 Å).8f,g Copolymerization of
methyl acrylate with CO was also successfully initiated and
catalyzed by 2a (Table 1, entries 6, 7).
(8) (a) Ozawa, F.; Hayashi, T.; Koide, H.; Yamamoto, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1991, 1469. (b) Dekker, G. P. C. M.; Elsevier, C. J.; Vrieze, K.;
Vanleeuwen, P. W. N. M.; Roobeek, C. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1992,
430, 357. (c) Rix, F. C.; Brookhart, M.; White, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 4746. (d) Braunstein, P.; Frison, C.; Morise, X. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2867. (e) Braunstein, P.; Durand, J.; Knorr, M.;
Strohmann, C. Chem. Commun. 2001, 211. (f) Reddy, K. R.; Surekha, K.;
Lee, G. H.; Peng, S. M.; Chen, J. T.; Liu, S. T. Organometallics 2001, 20,
1292. (g) Agostinho, M.; Braunstein, P. Chem. Commun. 2007, 58.
(9) Shen, H.; Jordan, R. F. Organometallics 2003, 22, 1878.
(10) Kang, M. S.; Sen, A.; Zakharov, L.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 12080.
(11) Philipp, D. M.; Muller, R. P.; Goddard, W. A.; Storer, J.; McAdon, M.;
Mullins, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10198.
A plausible mechanism for the regiocontrolled alternating
copolymerization is shown in Figure 3.16 When a mixture of 1 and
Pd(dba)2 was used, the reaction was initiated by formation of a
Pd-H bond via protonation of the Pd(0) species, followed by
insertion of methyl acrylate. Further insertion of CO and 2,1-
insertion of methyl acrylate in an alternating fashion leads to the
formation of the alternating copolymer. In fact, a 1-methoxycar-
(12) Phosphine-sulfonic acid ligand 1a was originally reported by the group
of Shell for the copolymerization of ethylene with methyl acrylate to afford
linear copolymer12a12a and the non-perfectly alternating copolymerization
of ethylene with CO.12b (a) Drent, E.; van Dijk, R.; van Ginkel, R.; van
Oort, B.; Pugh, R. I. Chem. Commun. 2002, 744. (b) Drent, E.; van Dijk,
R.; van Ginkel, R.; van Oort, B.; Pugh, R. I. Chem. Commun. 2002, 964.
(13) Several groups have investigated the chemistry of 1a: (a) Hearley, A. K.;
Nowack, R. A. J.; Rieger, B. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2755. (b) Kochi,
T.; Yoshimura, K.; Nozaki, K. Dalton Trans. 2006, 25. (c) Haras, A.;
Anderson, G. D. W.; Michalak, A.; Rieger, B.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics
2006, 25, 4491. (d) Newsham, D. K.; Borkar, S.; Sen, A.; Conner, D. M.;
Goodall, B. L. Organometallics 2007, 26, 3636. (e) Luo, S.; Vela, J.; Lief,
G. R.; Jordan, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8946. (f) Kochi, T.;
Noda, S.; Yoshimura, K.; Nozaki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8948.
(g) Weng, W.; Shen, Z.; Jordan, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15450.
See also ref 6.
1
bonylethyl group was detected at the initiating end by H NMR
for relatively low molecular weight copolymers (Table 1, entry 3),
as a result of the 2,1-insertion of methyl acrylate into the Pd-H
bond.15 In contrast, copolymers formed with 2a (entry 7) showed
the signal for an acetyl initiating end group, instead of the
1-methoxycarbonylethyl group. It is noteworthy that this system
conquered the difficulties in coordination and insertion of CO to
the five-membered chelate of C, which had never been ac-
complished using other ligands.8
(14) Less than 1% of poly(methyl acrylate) units compared to the methyl acrylate
units in the alternating copolymers were also observed.
(15) See Supporting Information.
(16) Copolymerization via a radical process seems to be denied. See Supporting
Information.
JA802161N
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 26, 2008 8129