predict severe attacks of acute pancreatitis.10-14 By using radio-
immunoassay tests, serum trypsin levels have been estimated for
healthy patients (248 ( 94.9 µg/L), for patients with chronic renal
failure (1100 ( 548 µg/L), and for patients with acute pancreatitis
(1399 ( 618 µg/L).15
Figure 1. Structure of pyrrole-alkylammonium monomer.
The degradation of gelatin film has been used as a semiquan-
titative screening test for pancreatic disorders. However, such a
test cannot easily be calibrated to give an absolute measurement
of trypsin concentration. Therefore, other sensitive tests such as
affinity-based reactions, Bragg reflector devices that measure the
change of temperature, pressure,16 and humidity17 on gelatin-based
films were developed. Since all these techniques are time-
consuming and require specific laboratory-based instrumentation,
plus trained personal, a more rapid and precise tool is needed to
overcome such drawbacks.
One of the most promising areas in the development of precise
analytical techniques for the detection of various biological com-
pounds is based on the development of biosensors. Such biosen-
sors have been reported for protease (trypsin) detection. For
instance, hologram trypsin sensors18,19 and biosensors for collagen-
ase detection20,21 were developed. Unfortunately, these biosensors
are not sufficiently sensitive for the lowest trypsin detection limits
and have reached to date just below the nanomolar range.
The present paper reports on a successful quantitative test for
a protease (trypsin) picomolar detection by measuring the current
increase recorded from glucose oxidase (GOX)-poly(pyrrole-
alkylammonium)-modified platinum electrodes coated with a
gelatin film that was subjected to a proteolytic enzymatic action.
reacted with tosyl chloride (2.85 g, 15 mmol) in anhydrous
pyridine (3 mL). The mixture was stirred at 20 °C for 15 h, washed
with water, and extracted with dichloromethane. After evaporation,
the crude product was purified by chromatography (3.05 g, yield
74%). 11-Pyrrol-1-ylundecyl p-toluenesulfonate (1.5 g) was refluxed
for 15 h at 90 °C in ethanol (15 mL) with an excess of triethylamine
(11 mL). The solvent and excess of triethylamine were removed
under vacuum. Tosylate anions were then replaced by tetrafluoro-
borate anions on an ion-exchange column (Amberlite IRA 93)
leading to a brown oil (1.44 g, yield 65%). H1 NMR (250 MHz/
CD3Cl3): δ (ppm) 6.62 (s, 2H), 6.09 (s, 2H), 3.83 (t, 2H), 3.24 (m,
6H), 3.07 (m, 2H), 1.58 (m, 2H), 1.35-1.23 (m, 25H). LiClO4
(194711000) was obtained from Acros Organics. The 8% (w/v)
gelatin was dissolved in distilled water and heated to 50 °C, until
it became completely molten. The gelatin solution was prepared
anew for each experiment.
Apparatus. Cyclic voltammogram and electropolymerization
were performed with EG&G PAR, model 173 potentiostat equipped
with a model 175 universal programmer, and a model 179 digital
coulometer in conjunction with
a
Kipp and Zonen
BD 91 XY/t recorder. An electrochemical three-electrode cell
(Metrohm) was used. The amperometric measurements were
performed using a Tacussel PRG-DL potentiostat in conjunction
with a thermostated electrochemical cell at 20 °C. The work-
ing electrodes were platinum electrodes (i.d. ) 5 mm) systemat-
ically polished with 2-µm diamond paste (Mecaprex Press PM).
The reference electrode used was a saturated Ag-AgCl-KCl
electrode (Ag/AgCl) while a Pt wire was used as a counter
electrode.
Biosensor Preparation. The polymer-enzyme electrodes
were prepared according to a two-step procedure previously re-
ported by Cosnier.23 The 6 mM pyrrole-alkylammonium mono-
mer (brownish, oily suspension) was suspended in pure distilled
water and sonicated for 3 h to facilitate a total monomer solu-
bilization. The working electrodes (platinum disk) were modified
at room temperature by spreading over their surface an aqueous
mixture based on 15 µL of monomer solution and 200 µg of GOX
and then dried under vacuum atmosphere for 15 min. The
resulting “dry” modified electrodes were transferred into a cell
containing an aqueous 0.1 M LiClO4 solution. Electrochemical
polymerization of the adsorbed coating (GOX + pyrrole monomer)
was carried out by controlled potential electrolysis at 0.85 V versus
Ag/AgCl. Further, the enzyme-modified electrodes were coated
with 20 µL of 8% (w/v) gelatin solution and dried under vacuum
atmosphere for 20 min.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Chemicals. Gelatin (type A, porcine skin, analytical grade,
G-2500), trypsin (from bovine pancreas, 9380 units/mg, T-4665),
GOX (from Aspergillus niger, type VII-S, 181 units/mg, G-7016),
and glucose (G-7528) were obtained from Sigma. (11-Pyrrol-1-
ylundecyl) triethylammonium tetrafluoroborate (Figure 1) was
synthesized in the following manner according to a previously
described protocol.22 11-Pyrrol-1-ylundecanol (2.6 g, 11 mmol) was
(10) Segal, I.; Chaloner, C.; Douglas, J.; John, K. D.; Zaidi, A.; Cotter, L.; Appelros,
S.; Borgstrosm, A.; Braganza, J. M. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 883-
92.
(11) Appelros, S.; Lindgren, S.; Borgstrom, A. Eur. J. Surg. 2001, 167: 281-6.
(12) Yadav, D.; Agarwal, N.; Pitchumoni, C. S. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97,
1309-18.
(13) Lempinen, M.; Kyl¨anpa¨a¨-Ba¨ck, M. L.; Stenman, U. H.; Puolakkainen, P.;
Haapiainen, R.; Finne, P.; Korvuo A.; Kemppainen, E. Clin. Chem. 2001,
47, 2103-7.
(14) Kyla¨np¨a¨a-Ba¨ck, M. L.; Kemppainen, E.; Puolakkainen, P. J. Pancreas 2002,
3, 34-48.
(15) Artigas, J. M.; Garcia, M. E.; Faure, M. R.; Gimeno, A. M. Postgrad. Med. J.
1981, 57, 219-22.
(16) Kersey, A. D.; Berkoff, T. A.; Morey, W. W. Opt. Lett. 1993, 18, 1370-2.
(17) Spoocer, R. C.; Al-Ramadhan, F. A.; Jones. B. E. Int. J. Optoelectron. 1992,
7, 449-52.
(18) Millington, R. B.; Mayes, A. G.; Blyth, J.; Lowe, C. R. Anal. Chem. 1995,
67, 4229-33.
(19) Millington, R. B.; Mayes, A. G.; Blyth J.; Lowe, C. R. Sens. Actuators, B:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Electrochemical Characterization of Poly(pyrrole-alkyl-
ammonium)-GOX-Modified Electrodes. As reported previ-
ously,23 an original strategy of enzyme entrapment into electro-
generated polymers involved the immobilization of amphiphilic
Chem. 1996, 33, 55-5.
(20) Saum, A. G. E.; Cumming, R. H.; Rowell, F. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1998,
13, 511-8.
(21) Saum, A. G. E.;. Cumming, R. H.; Rowell, F. J. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000,
15, 305-31.
(22) Coche-Guerente, L.; Deronzier, A.; Galland, B.; Labbe, P.; Moutet J. C.;
Reverdy, G. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1991, 381-6.
(23) Cosnier, S. Electroanalysis 1997, 9, 894-902.
6328 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 78, No. 18, September 15, 2006