is great as the natural product itself elicits off target effects that
limit or preclude clinical applications.
kinome, but its functional role could be significant because
many of these kinases are implicated in major diseases
including cancer, cardiovascular, and cognitive indications.15
Ligands for the selective regulation (activation or inhibition)
of C1 domain proteins are not available, adding further
importance to the search for new high-affinity, selective
agents. Related to the search for ligand structural features
that could influence potency, selectivity, and function, it is
noteworthy that no systematic studies on the role of C7
functional variations on biological activity have been reported
(Figure 1). Significantly, docking studies using PKC sub-
domain crystal structures and homology models suggest that
the C7 functionality of bryostatin is proximate to a conserved
tryptophan residue in the novel class of PKC isozymes and
a conserved tyrosine residue in the conventional class of PKC
isoforms (Figure 2).16 The biorelevancy of such models has
Total synthesis offers a means to address this problem,
but current syntheses, while impressive in content, are as
yet too long (>70 steps) to impact immediate supply needs.11
Engineered biosynthesis is another notable and promising
source under investigation.12 In 1986, we initiated a third
approach to addressing this problem based on function-
oriented synthesis.13 In this approach, the structural features
of the complex bryostatin target that putatively influence
function (activity) are recapitulated on a simplified scaffold
to produce a functional analog that is designed for rapid,
step-economical, and practical synthesis.13a Illustrative of this
approach, designed analog 1 (Figure 1) is found to be more
potent than bryostatin and can be readily synthesized in a
highly convergent fashion (<30 steps, 19 LL) that can be
scaled to meet clinical needs.14
The current study is directed at a hitherto unexplored but
fundamentally and clinically significant issue, namely the
role of A-ring C7 functionality in the activities of bryostatin
and analogs related to 1. Bryostatin 1’s activity is mediated
through its potent binding to the C1 domain of various
proteins, including kinases such as protein kinase C (PKC).
This domain is found in only a small subset of the human
(5) Oz, H. S.; Hughes, W. T.; Rehg, J. E.; Thomas, E. K. Microb.
Pathog. 2000, 29, 187–190.
(6) For a recent clinical trial, see: Ajani, J. A.; Jiang, Y.; Faust, J.; Chang,
B. B.; Ho, L.; Yao, J. C.; Rousey, S.; Dakhil, S.; Cherny, R. C.; Craig, C.;
Bleyer, A InVest. New Drugs 2006, 24, 353–357.
Figure 2. Docking of bryostatin 1 to the C1b domain of novel
(7) Hongpaisan, J.; Alkon, D. L Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007,
104, 19571–19576.
PKCδ. The distance between the C7 acetate carbonyl and tryp-
tophan hydrogen is 1.9 Å, and the bond angle is O-H-N )
152°.
(8) Etcheberrigaray, R.; Tan, M.; Dewachter, I.; Kuiperi, C.; Van der
Auwera, I.; Wera, S.; Qiao, L. X.; Bank, B.; Nelson, T. J.; Kozikowski,
A. P.; Van Leuven, F.; Alkon, D. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004,
101, 11141–11146.
(9) Schaufelberger, D. E.; Koleck, M. P.; Beutler, J. A.; Vatakis, A. M.;
Alvarado, A. B.; Andrews, P.; Marzo, L. V.; Muschik, G. M.; Roacch, J.;
Ross, J. T.; Lebherz, W. B.; Reeves, M. P.; Eberwein, R. M.; Rodgers,
L. L.; Testerman, R. P.; Snader, K. M.; Forenza, S. J. Nat. Prod. 1991, 54,
1265–1270.
not been tested, but such differences in binding selectivity
could have profound therapeutic ramifications. It is note-
worthy that these residues of PKC have recently been found
to be critical for selective isozyme activation by the endog-
enous ligand, diacylglycerol.17 We report herein the efficient
and convergent synthesis of 12 members of the first class of
C7-functionalized bryostatin analogs and their initial biologi-
cal evaluation.
(10) (a) Wender, P. A.; DeBrabander, J.; Harran, P. G.; Jimenez, J. M.;
Koehler, M. F. T.; Lippa, B.; Park, C. M.; Siedenbiedel, C.; Pettit, G. R
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 6624–6629. (b) Kortmansky, J.;
Schwartz, G. K. Cancer InVest. 2003, 21, 924–936.
(11) (a) Evans, D. A.; Carter, P. H.; Carreira, E. M.; Charette, A. B.;
Prunet, J. A.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7540–7552. (b)
Kageyama, M.; Tamura, T.; Nantz, M. H.; Roberts, J. C.; Somfai, P.;
Whritenour, D. C.; Masamune, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7407–
7408. (c) Ohmori, K.; Ogawa, Y.; Obitsu, T.; Ishikawa, Y.; Nishiyama, S.;
Yamamura, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2290–2294.
(12) (a) Lopanik, N.; Lindquist, N.; Targett, N. Oecologia 2004, 139,
131–139. (b) Sudek, S.; Lopanik, N. B.; Waggoner, L. E.; Hildebrand, M.;
Anderson, C.; Liu, H. B.; Patel, A.; Sherman, D. H.; Haygood, M. G. J.
Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 67–74.
Our overall strategy employs a Yamaguchi esterification
followed by a macroacetalization to convergently couple the
target recognition (10) and spacer domains generated from
intermediates 8 or 9. The synthesis of C7 diversifiable spacer
domains draws in turn on a stereospecific Prins cyclization18
to convergently generate the syn-pyran A-ring from bis-
nucleophile 4 and 2 equiv of aldehyde 3, a strategy that
exploits the pseudosymmetry of the designed spacer domain.
The synthesis of spacer domain intermediate 8 began with
(13) (a) Wender, P. A.; Verma, V. A.; Paxton, T. J.; Pillow, T. H. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 40–49. (b) Wender, P. A.; Koehler, K. F.; Sharkey,
N. A.; Dellaquila, M. L.; Blumberg, P. M Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1986, 83, 4214–4218.
(14) (a) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Bennett, C. E.; Bi, F. C.; Brenner,
S. E.; Clarke, M. O.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; Lacoˆte, E.; Lippa, B. S.; Nell,
P. G.; Turner, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13648–13649. For other
recent analog work, see: (b) Wender, P. A.; DeChristopher, B. A.; Schrier,
A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6658–6659. (c) Keck, G. E.; Kraft,
M. B.; Truong, A. P.; Li, W.; Sanchez, C. C.; Kedei, N.; Lewin, N. E.;
Blumberg, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6660–6661. (d) Wender,
P. A.; Horan, J. C.; Verma, V. A Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5299–5302, and
references therein. (e) For a review of our bryostatin analog program, see:
Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Hilinski, M. K.; Horan, J. C.; Kan, C.; Verma,
V. A. Beyond Natural Products: Synthetic Analogues of Bryostatin 1 In
Drug DiscoVery Research: New Frontiers in the Post-Genomic Era; Huang,
Z., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp 127-162.
(15) Manning, G.; Whyte, D. B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam,
S Science 2002, 298, 1912–1934.
(16) Wender, P. A.; Baryza, J. L.; Brenner, S. E.; Clarke, M. O.; Craske,
M. L.; Horan, J. C.; Meyer, T. Curr. Drug DiscoV. Tech. 2004, 1, 1–11.
(17) Dries, D. R.; Gallegos, L. L.; Newton, A. C. J. Biol. Chem. 2007,
282, 826–830.
(18) (a) Keck, G. R.; Covel, J. A.; Schiff, T.; Yu, T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
1189–1192. (b) Mekhalfia, A.; Marko´, I. E.; Adams, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1991, 32, 4783–4786.
3332
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 15, 2008