Communications
scale. When lower catalyst loadings (5 mol%) were used
these reactions were much slower,although the overall yields
were similar. Somewhat surprisingly,the platinum-catalyzed
procedure appeared to be unaffected by the thiocarbamate
functionality,thus highlighting the robust nature of this
reaction.[16] A chemoselective allylic oxidation was then
required. Much experimentation established that essentially
classical conditions (SeO2,14,-dioxane,85 8C) achieved this
transformation in adequate yield.[17] Given our difficulties in
achieving this conversion in high yield,effective methods for
the allylic oxidation of complex organic structures are still
required.
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: a) H2O2, LiOH (96%); b) NaH,
HSPh; c) NaBO3·4H2O, AcOH (88%, over 2 steps); d) 1. DBU, DMF,
À408C; 2. methyl methacrylate; 3. warming to 408C (63%, over 3
steps); e) BrMgCH2CH2CCSi(CH3)3, CuBr·DMS, THF, À78 to À408C
(83%); f) (C4H9)4NF, THF (96%). Ac=acetyl, DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo-
[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide, DMS=dimethyl
sulfide.
Treatment of 9 with 1m sodium hydroxide cleanly
removed the carbamate group from the sulfur atom
(Scheme 5). As expected,the thiolate thus generated sponta-
installation of the double bond. Formation of 4 by this
procedure was more efficient than vinylogous Baylis–Hilman-
type reactions. A cuprate addition followed by desilylation
was used to produce 5 as an (ultimately inconsequential)
mixture of epimers. Importantly,the conjugate addition was
highly diastereoselective at C7 (fawcettidine numbering).[7,14]
At this point the substrate required elaboration to install
both the enamide functional group and the protected sulfide
moiety prior to annulation. To this end,amine salt 6[15] was
condensed with the epimeric mixture 5 to produce enamide 7
in 70% yield as a 10:1 mixture of enamide isomers
(Scheme 4). This mixture was carried forward without further
separation as these isomers interconvert in the next reaction.
Enamide 7 could be considered a potentially disastrous
substrate for a reaction involving platinum catalysis,consid-
ering the affinity of sulfur atoms towards platinum. Even
though the sulfur atom was protected as a thiocarbamate,this
step was approached with some trepidation. These fears
Scheme 5. Completion of the synthesis of 1. Reagents and conditions:
a) 1m NaOH (76%); b) 1. ethylene glycol, PPTS, benzene (87%);
2. mCPBA, CH2Cl2 (98%); c) CBr2F2, KOH·alumina, tBuOH, CH2Cl2
(46%); d) 1. H2, Pd/C, EtOH/THF (57%); 2. LiAlH4, THF (71%);
3. 1m HCl, THF (60%). mCPBA=meta-chloroperbenzoic acid,
PPTS=pyridinium para-toluenesulfonate.
neously added to the enone functionality in a conjugate
fashion to produce sulfide 10 in 76% yield. The protection of
the carbonyl group of 10 followed by sulfide oxidation with
mCPBA to give sulfone 11 proceeded uneventfully.
proved to be unfounded,however,as subjecting
7 to
platinum(II) chloride (10 mol%) led to smooth annulation
and formation of tricycle 8 in good yields,even on a gram
Our attempts to carry out the Ramberg–Bäcklund process
by using two-step procedure failed. The “one-step” procedure
disclosed by Chan et al. turned out to be successful.[18]
Treatment of 11 with dibromodifluoromethane in a tert-
butanol/dichloromethane solvent mixture and in the presence
of potassium hydroxide adsorbed onto alumina enabled the
isolation of alkene 12 in 46% yield. Interestingly,crystals of
12 were amenable to X-ray diffraction analysis,and a solid-
state molecular structure was obtained (Figure 1).[19] The
conversion of 12 into 1 was subsequently carried out by
hydrogenation over palladium on carbon,reduction of the
enamide to the enamine with lithium aluminum hydride,and
conversion of the ketal into its corresponding ketone with
aqueous hydrochloric acid.
As the original structural elucidation of 1 was defined by
conversion from other members of the Lycopodium family,
high-field NMR spectroscopic data are not available for
comparison. We note that 1 has spectroscopic features in
common with recently isolated hydroxylated derivatives of
1.[20] Specifically,key spectroscopic data include the 1H NMR
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: a) 6, AcOH, toluene, 1108C
(70%); b) PtCl2 (10 mol%), toluene, 908C (87%); c) SeO2, 1,4-diox-
ane, 858C (54%).
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4221 –4223