Published on Web 07/19/2008
Total Synthesis and Biological Mode of Action of Largazole: A
Potent Class I Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor
Albert Bowers,† Nathan West,§ Jack Taunton,| Stuart L. Schreiber,
James E. Bradner,§ and Robert M. Williams*,†,‡
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State UniVersity, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, UniVersity
of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado 80045, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney
Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology,
UniVersity of CaliforniasSan Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, Chemistry & Chemical Biology, HarVard UniVersity, Broad Institute of
HarVard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Received May 6, 2008; E-mail: rmw@lamar.colostate.edu
Abstract: The efficient total synthesis of the recently described natural substance largazole (1) and its
active metabolite largazole thiol (2) is described. The synthesis required eight linear steps and proceeded
in 37% overall yield. It is demonstrated that largazole is a pro-drug that is activated by removal of the
octanoyl residue from the 3-hydroxy-7-mercaptohept-4-enoic acid moiety to generate the active metabolite
2, which is an extraordinarily potent Class I histone deacetylase inhibitor. Synthetic largazole and 2 have
been evaluated side-by-side with FK228 and SAHA for inhibition of HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 6. Largazole and
largazole thiol were further assayed for cytotoxic activity against a panel of chemoresistant melanoma cell
lines, and it was found that largazole is substantially more cytotoxic than largazole thiol; this difference is
attributed to differences in the cell permeability of the two substances.
Introduction
have been identified, which are generally divided into four
classes on the basis of their sequence homology to yeast
Largazole (1) is a densely functionalized macrocyclic dep-
sipeptide, recently isolated from the cyanobacterium Symploca
sp. by Luesch and co-workers.1 This natural product exhibits
exceptionally potent and selective biological activity, with 2-
to 10-fold differential growth inhibition in a number of
transformed and non-transformed human- and murine-derived
cell lines. The remarkable selectivity of this agent against cancer
cells prompts particular interest in its mode of action and its
value as a potential cancer chemotherapeutic.
counterparts.9 With respect to cancer therapy, there is an
emerging consensus that Class I HDACs are clinically relevant
and that the undesirable toxicity associated with the first
generation of HDAC inhibitors may be related to class indis-
criminancy. As a result, our laboratories have recently initiated
programs aimed at the synthesis and modification of peptide-
and depsipeptide-based HDACi with the objective of optimizing
structures for class- and even isoform-specific inhibition.
In their isolation paper, Luesch, et al. stated that “the
3-hydroxy-7-mercaptohept-4-enoic acid unit in 1 is unprec-
edented in natural products.” 1 In contrast to this assertion, the
(S)-3-hydroxy-7-mercaptohept-4-enoic acid is in fact an essential
motif in several cytotoxic natural products, including FK228
(FR901228),2 FR901375,2 and spiruchostatin3 (Figure 1), all
of which are known histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi).4,5
The histone deacetylase enzymes are zinc metalloenzymes
that catalyze the hydrolysis of acetylated lysine residues in
chromatin, and thereby regulate transcription in eukaryotic
cells.6,7 Their selective inhibition has recently become a major
area of research in cancer chemotherapy.8 To date, 18 HDACs
(2) (a) Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho
JP,03141296, 1991. (b) Ueda, H.; Nakajima, H.; Hori, Y.; Fujita, T.;
Nishimura, M.; Goto, T.; Okuhara, M. J. Antibiot. 1994, 47, 301. (c)
Shigematsu, N.; Ueda, H.; Takase, S.; Tanaka, H. J. Antibiot. 1994,
47, 311. (d) Ueda, H.; Manda, T.; Matsumoto, S.; Mukumoto, S.;
Nishigaki, F.; Kawamura, I.; Shimomura, K. J. Antibiot. 1994, 47,
315.
(3) Masuoka, Y.; Nagai, A.; Shin-ya, K.; Furihata, K.; Nagai, K.; Suzuki,
K.; Hayakawa, Y.; Seto, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 41.
(4) Townsend, P. A.; Crabb, S. J.; Davidson, S. M.; Johnson, P. W. M.;
Packham, G.; Ganesan, A. The bicyclic depsipeptide family of histone
deacetylase inhibitors. In Chemical Biology; Schreiber, S. L., Kapoor,
T. M., Wess, G., Eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.: Weinheim,
Germany, 2007; Vol. 69, pp 3-720..
(5) Reference 1b substantially corrected the error in ref 1awith respect to
the novelty of the (S)-3-hydroxy-7-mercaptohept-4-enoic acid moiety
and also reported IC50 HDAC inhibitory data for largazole.
(6) Somech, R.; Israeli, S.; Simon, A. Cancer Treat. ReV. 2004, 30, 461.
(7) (a) Miller, T. A.; Witter, D. J.; Belvedere, S. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
5097. (b) Moradei, O.; Maroun, C. R.; Paquin, I.; Vaisburg, A. Curr.
Med. Chem.; Anti-Cancer Agents 2005, 5, 529. (c) Bolden, J. E.; Peart,
M. J.; Johnstone, R. W. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2006, 5, 769.
(8) Minucci, S.; Pelicci, P. G. Nature ReV. Cancer 2006, 6, 38.
(9) (a) Taunton, J.; Hassig, C. A.; Schreiber, S. L. Science 1996, 272,
408. (b) Grozinger, C. M.; Hassig, C. A.; Schreiber, S. L. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 4868. (c) Johnstone, R. W. Nature ReV.
Drug DiscoVery 2002, 1, 287.
† Colorado State University.
§ Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
| University of CaliforniasSan Francisco.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
‡ University of Colorado Cancer Center.
(1) (a) Taori, K.; Paul, V. J.; Luesch, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
1806–1807. (b) Subsequent to the submission of the present manuscript
on May 6, 2008, Luesch et al. independently published a distinct
synthesis of largazole: Ying, Y.; Taori, K.; Kim, H.; Homg, J.; Luesch,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8455–8459.
9
10.1021/ja8033763 CCC: $40.75
2008 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2008, 130, 11219–11222 11219