C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. NHC Borane Reduction of Xanthates unitiated with
Et3B/O2
These early results show that NHC boranes are competent radical
hydrogen atom donors. By changing the NHC ligand and the borane
substituents, there is promise to modulate both the BDE of the B-H
bond (see Figure 1) and the steric environment about the B-H
bond. In the immediate future, an increased understanding of these
preliminary results will expedite development of the class. For
example, what is the rate constant for hydrogen transfer from NHC
boranes? And what is the fate of the NHC boryl radical that is
presumably produced? Open questions aside, the promise is clear.
To fashion a new tin or silicon hydride, especially a chiral one,
can be an arduous process. In contrast, NHCs can be ligated to
boranes to make new complexes in one step. Many achiral and
chiral NHCs are already available, and the class is growing rapidly
thanks to applications in metal and organocatalysis.11
Acknowledgment. We thank UPMC, CNRS, IUF, and ANR
(grant BLAN0309 “Radicaux verts”) for funding. DPC thanks l’e´tat
et la re´gion Ile-de-France for a Chaire Blaise Pascal and NSF for
funding. We thank Drs. Julien Coulomb and Jason Clyburne for
helpful discussions. We thank Dr. Lise-Marie Chamoreau for
solving the X-ray structure.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization of all new compounds. This material is available free
References
a Run using 2 equiv of NHC/borane complex. b Recovered SM, 21%
(1) For reviews, see: (a) Baguley, P. A.; Walton, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 3072. (b) Studer, A.; Amrein, S. Synthesis 2002, 835. (c) Gilbert,
B. C.; Parsons, A. F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2 2002, 367.
(2) For selected recent reports, see: (a) Schoenebeck, F.; Murphy, J. A.; Zhou,
S.-Z.; Uenoyama, Y.; Miclo, Y.; Tuttle, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
13368. (b) Ryu, I.; Uehara, S.; Hirao, H.; Fukuyama, T. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 1005. (c) Smith, D. M.; Pulling, M. E.; Norton, J. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 770. (d) Postigo, A.; Kopsov, S.; Ferreri, C.; Chatgilialoglu,
C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5159. (e) Guin, J.; Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld, C.; Grimme,
S.; Studer, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4498. (f) Sibi, M. P.; Hasegawa,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4124. (g) Beeson, T. D.; Mastracchio,
A.; Hong, J.-B.; Ashton, K.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Science 2007, 316, 582.
(h) Cohen, T.; Gibney, H.; Ivanov, R.; Yeh, E. A.-H.; Marek, I.; Curran,
D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15405. (i) Biechy, A.; Hachisu, S.;
Quiclet-Sire, B.; Ricard, L.; Zard, S. Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
1436. (j) Goddard, J.-P.; Gomez, C.; Brebion, F.; Beauvie`re, S.; Fensterbank,
L.; Malacria, M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2929. (k) Crich, D.; Grant, D.;
Bowers, A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12106. (l) Godineau, E.;
Landais, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12662. (m) Feray, L.; Bertrand,
M. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 3164. (n) Gansa¨uer, A.; Fan, C.-A.; Piestert,
F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6916.
c Run using 0.5 equiv of NHC/borane complex. d E/Z ratio was ∼3:1.
hexenyl radical precursor 4d provided the closed product 5d (entry
7). In aggregate, these results support the intermediacy of radicals.
The data from a second set of reactions under popular Et3B/O2
conditions9 are summarized in Table 2. These reactions were
conducted in benzene at room temperature. Septa were pierced with
a needle to admit ambient air. The isolated yields of products from
these experiments were generally higher than those with AIBN
initiation, ranging from 71-84% (except for entry 10, 60%). Again,
the cyclopropyl radical precursor 4c gave an opened product (entry
6). In contrast, the benzyl radical precursor 8 gave not a reduced
but a dimerized product 9 (80%, entry 9). We also reduced 4b with
50% (0.5 equiv) of both 3 and Et3B (entry 4). Interestingly, while
21% starting 4d was recovered, the yield of 5b was 71%. This
raises the possibility that the complexes can donate more than one
H atom.
Because both Et3B and Et3B-OH2 are known to be modest
radical hydrogen atom donors,10 we conducted control experiments
with 4b to assess whether either was intervening, in other words,
whether the NHC borane was superfluous. The amount of Et3B
was reduced to 20% without detriment (entry 3). The use of
rigorously dry solvents and dry oxygen instead of air did not
decrease the yield either. No reaction occurred when the oxygen
was omitted, and only traces of product (13%) were formed when
the NHC borane was omitted. This low yield is not surprising since
reductions with Et3B and Et3B-OH2 are usually conducted with
large excesses of reagents.10 The results of these control experiments
support the proposition that the NHC borane is the primary
hydrogen donor under these conditions.
(3) (a) Rablen, P. R.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4648. (b)
Calculated at the G-2 level.
(4) Rablen, P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8350.
(5) Amine boranes: Roberts, B. P. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1999, 28, 25.
(6) Phosphine boranes: (a) Barton, D. H. R.; Jacob, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 1331. (b) Lucarini, M.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 1161. (c) Baban, J. A.; Roberts, B. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans 2 1988, 1195.
(7) Chatgilialoglu, C.; Newcomb, M. In AdVances In Organometallic Chemistry;
West, R., Hill, A. F., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1999; Vol. 44, p
67-112..
(8) (a) Kuhn, N.; Henkel, G.; Kratz, T.; Kreutzberg, J.; Boese, R.; Maulitz,
A. H. Chem. Ber. 1993, 126, 2041. (b) Ramnial, T.; Jong, H.; McKenzie,
I. D.; Jennings, M.; Clyburne, J. A. C. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1722. (c)
Wang, Y.; Quillian, B.; Wei, P.; Wannere, C. S.; Xie, Y.; King, R. B.;
Schaefer, H. F., III; v. R. Schleyer, P.; Robinson, G. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 12412. (d) Yamaguchi, Y.; Kashiwabara, T.; Ogata, K.; Miura,
Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Kobayashi, K.; Ito, T. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2160.
(9) Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P.,
Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 1, pp 11-27.
(10) (a) Boivin, J.; Nguyen, V. T. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3,No. 45, 46,
47. (b) Jin, J.; Newcomb, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5098. (c) Spiegel,
D. A.; Wiberg, K. B.; Schacherer, L. N.; Medeiros, M. R.; Wood, J. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12513. (d) Medeiros, M. R.; Schacherer,
L. N.; Spiegel, D. A.; Wood, J. L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4427. (e) Pozzi, D.;
Scanlan, E. M.; Renaud, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14204.
(11) (a) Hahn, F. E.; Jahnke, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3122. (b)
Marion, N.; Diez-Gonzalez, S.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 2988.
Finally, the BD3 analogue of 2 was prepared and used to reduce
6 under the conditions of Table 2, entry 10. The isolated yield of
7 was only 27%, but it contained 70% deuterium at the deoxy
1
position as assessed by integration of its H NMR spectrum. This
result (reduced yield, substantial but incomplete labeling) presages
a substantial isotope effect.
JA804150K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 31, 2008 10083