A. Margotti et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 4784–4787
4787
Lahti, P. M., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1999; (c) Rawson, J. M.; Alberala, A.;
Whalley, A. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 2560–2575.
in the complex. In the former case, the broadening of the lines
indicates that the nitroxide could be located in a position close
to the macrocyclic receptor21 similar to that found by Cooke et
al. in their armed CBPQT4+ derivative containing a pyrrole moi-
ety.22 Reasonably, complexation displaces the radical substituent
from its original position to a new position in which the free radical
part is farther from the macrocycle, thus resulting in an improve-
ment of spectral resolution.
6. (a) Caneschi, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 392–398;
(b) Manriquez, J. M.; Yee, G. T.; McLean, R. S.; Epstein, A. J.; Miller, J. S.
Science 1991, 252, 1415–1417; (c) Inoue, K.; Hayamizu, T.; Iwamura, H.;
Hashizume, D.; Ohashi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1803–1804; (d) Ise, T.;
Ishida, T.; Hashizume, D.; Iwasaki, F.; Nogami, T. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 6106–
6113.
7. (a) Forrester, A. R.; Hay, J. M.; Thomson, R. H. Organic Chemistry of Stable Free
Radicals; Academic Press: London, 1968; (b) Rozanstev, E. G. Free Nitroxyl
Radicals; Plenum: New York, 1970; (c) Rozantsev, E. G.; Sholle, V. D. Synthesis
1971, 401; (d) Rozantsev, E. G.; Sholle, V. D. Synthesis 1971, 190; (e) Keana, J. F.
W. Chem. Rev. 1978, 78, 37–64.
8. Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1995.
9. (a) Cram, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1009–1020; (b) Cram, D. J.
Science 1983, 219, 1177–1183.
10. Rajca, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Pink, M.; Rajca, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13497–
13507.
11. (a) Ionita, G.; Chechik, V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 3096–3098; (b) Bardelang,
D.; Rockenbauer, A.; Jicsinszky, L.; Finet, J.-P.; Karoui, H.; Lambert, S.; Marque,
S. R. A.; Tordo, P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7657–7667; (c) Franchi, P.; Fanì, M.;
Mezzina, E.; Lucarini, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1901–1904.
12. The synthesis of mono- and bis-nitroxides derived from [2,2]-paracyclophane
has been already reported: Forrester, A. R.; Ramasseul, R. J. Chem. Soc. (B) 1971,
1638–1644.
Further support for the hypothesis that the heterocycle position
changes upon complexation comes from the observation of down-
field shifts for the piperidine protons when passing from the re-
duced free macrocycle 1a-OH to the corresponding diamagnetic
complex 7-OH (the NMR signals due to the heterocylic protons
are too broad to be detected in the spectrum of 1Å and 7Å).
EPR spectra of CH3CN solutions containing 1Å or 7Å were also re-
corded. The spectra show typical nitroxide EPR signals with the
high field line slightly broadened due to restricted tumbling. Quite
unexpected, the two radicals show very similar 14N hyperfine split-
tings, aN (15.82 G for 1Å and 15.75 G for 7Å), indicating that the com-
plexation does not significantly affect the spin distribution on the
nitroxide moiety.
13. Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Raymo, F. M.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3349–3391.
14. Benniston, A. C.; Harriman, A. Synlett 1993, 223–226.
Attempts to isolate the complex between the diradical CBPQT4+
(1bÅÅ) with DMN were unsuccessful, thus indicating that formation
of host–guest complex with DMN is considerably less favourable in
this case, presumably owing to the steric hindrance of the two
arms opposing to the insertion of the guest.
15. Compound 1aÅ:
A solution of 6a (0.240 g, 0.34 mmol) and 5 (0.164 g,
0.34 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (50 ml) was heated under reflux for 24 h.
More dibromide 5 (0.071 g, 0.14 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture
was refluxed for an additional 24 h. After the solution was cooled down to
room temperature, the precipitate was filtered off and washed with
acetonitrile (10 ml) and Et2O (10 ml). The solid was dissolved in water and
treated with
a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6 until no further
In conclusion, we have described the preparation of two new
receptors based on CBPQT tetracation bringing one or two substit-
uents on the paraphenylene units, whereby the arms contain per-
sistent paramagnetic centres. In particular, the monoradical
receptor 1aÅ is able to complex eletron-rich molecules. The com-
plex with DMN, isolated by flash chromatography, provides evi-
dence that replacement of the radical arm with DMN in the
complex imparts a drastic change upon the spectral proton signals
of the cavity, that appear well resolved and separated, contrary to
what happens in the free receptor which displays broad signals.
Therefore, the radical arm becomes a probe to detect inclusion
complex formation. We believe that the reported radical-armed
macrocycles may represent promising hosts for the preparation
of more complexed paramagnetic supramolecular architectures,
that is, rotaxanes or catenanes, which can be employed as mole-
cular magnetic devices.
precipitation was observed. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with
water, MeOH, Et2O and dried, affording
a reddish powder (0.058 g,
0.044 mmol) in 13% yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K): d = 8.80–9.20
(m, 8H, H , H0 , H ), 8.30–8.50 (m, 8H, Hb, H , H Þ, 7.40–7.80 (m, 7H, HAr
,
0
0
0
a
a
b
C6H4), 5.75–6.10 (m, 8H, a, a0, b, b0), 5.20–5.35b(br s, 2H, CH2O); positive ESI-
MS: m/z 1167.7 [MꢀPF6]+, 511.2 [Mꢀ2PF6]2+. Compound 1bÅÅ: A solution of 6b
(0.140 g, 0.15 mmol) and 5 (0.071 g, 0.15 mmol) in dry acetonitrile (23 ml) was
heated under reflux for 24 h. After the solution was cooled down to room
temperature, the precipitate was filtered off and washed with acetonitrile
(10 ml) and Et2O (10 ml). The solid was dissolved in water and treated with a
saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6 until no further precipitation was
observed. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with water, MeOH, Et2O
and dried, affording a brown powder (0.036 g, 0.023 mmol) in 15% yield. 1H
NMR (600 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K): d = 8.98 (br s, 4H, H ), 8.90 (br s, 4H, H0 ), 8.43
a
a
a
(br s, 8H, Hb, H0bÞ, 7.20–7.80 (m, 6H, HAr), 5.75–6.10 (m, 8H, a, a0), 5.10–5.40 (br
s, 4H, CH2O), 2.92–3.20 (m, 1H, 4-H), 2.02–2.12 (m, 2H, Heq), 1.64–1.76 (m, 2H,
Hax), 1.44 (s, 12H, Me).
16. Mezzina, E.; Fanì, M.; Ferroni, F.; Franchi, P.; Menna, M.; Lucarini, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 3773–3777.
17. From the spectral data it is not possible to gain information on the possible
isomers, which can be formed in the biradical respect to the relative
orientation of the radical arms both in the paraphenylene portions (pseudo-
meta, o pseudo-para) and in the macrocycle (sin or anti). For a discussion on the
possible isomers in disubstituted paracyclophanes see Ref. 12.
Acknowledgements
18. (a) Odell, B.; Reddington, M. V.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.;
Williams, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1547–1550; (b) Ashton, P.
R.; Odell, B.; Reddington, M. V.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Stoddart, J. F.; Williams, D. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 1550–1553.
Financial support from MUR (Contract 2006033539) and from
the University of Bologna is gratefully acknowledged. We also like
to thank Fiammetta Ferroni for technical assistance, Dr. Andrea
Zattoni and Dr. Paolo Nanni for helpful discussion.
19. Compound 7aÅ:
A solution containing 2a (0.1 g, 0.14 mmol), 5 (0.066 g,
0.14 mmol), DMN (0.079 g, 0.42 mmol) and NaI (0.007 g) in dry DMF (10 ml)
was stirred at room temperature for 5 days under nitrogen. The solvent was
removed under vacuum and the residue was chromatographed over a silica gel
column (length 6 cm, i.d. 1.5 cm) using a mixture of MeOH/NH4Cl (2 M)/
CH3NO2 (4:4:2) as eluent. The fractions containing the complex, indicated by
purple spots of TLC analysis (Rf 0.40), were combined together and
concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in water and a saturated
aqueous solution of NH4PF6 was added to afford 7aÅ. The precipitate was
washed with water and dried, furnishing the complex as a purple solid in 33%
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (spectroscopic characterization of all new
compounds) associated with this article can be found, in the online
yield. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3CN, 298 K): d = 8.88 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2H, H0 ), 8.86 (d,
a
0
J = 4.8 Hz, 2H, H0 ), 8.83 (s, 2H, H ), 8.75 (s, 2H, H ), 7.99 (s, 6H, Hb, H ), 7.93 (s,
0
References and notes
a
a
a
b
0
2H, Hb ), 7.78 (br s, 1H, Ho) 7.67 (s, 4H, C6H4), 7.48 (br s, 2H, Hm, Hp), 6.86 (m,
2H, H-30), 6.67 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, H-20), 5.88–5.98 (m, 2H, a0), 5.80 (s, 2H, a), 5.77
(s, 2H, b) 5.76 (s, 2H, b), 5.50–5.65 (m, 2H, H-40), 5.37 (br s, 2H, CH2O), 3.98 (s,
6H, OMe).
1. For a recent review see: Hicks, R. G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1321–1338.
2. Berliner, L. J. Spin Labelling; Academic Press: New York, 1979.
3. (a) Perkins, M. J. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1980, 17, 1; (b) Rehorek, D. Chem. Soc. Rev.
1991, 20, 341–353; (c) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Bowry, V. W.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 4983–4992; (d) Bowry, V. W.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 4992–4996.
4. Zweier, J. L.; Kuppusamy, P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85, 5703–5707.
5. (a) Amabilino, D. B.; Veciana, J. In Magnetism, Molecules to Materials II; Miller, J.
S., Drillon, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 2, pp 1–60; (b) Magnetic
20. Ref. 2, pp 339–372.
21. The formation of a self-complexing system having the radical inside the cavity
cannot be proved by NMR because of the lack of the nitroxide heterocyclic
signals in the spectrum.
22. Cooke, G.; Woisel, P.; Bria, M.; Delattre, F.; Garety, J. F.; Hewage, S. G.; Rabani,
G.; Rosair, G. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1423–1426.