nucleotide sugar via exposure to a nucleoside phosphoro-
morpholidate, phosphoimidazolide, or another appro-
priate electrophilic phosphorus(V) source.7,10 Although
these methods can provide access to a desired depro-
tected glycosyl 1-phosphate, the number of steps re-
quired and difficult purifications limit their efficiency.
These synthetic issues culminate in limited commercial
availability and prohibitive prices for many glycosyl
1-phosphates.
Table 1. Acid-Catalyzed Condensation of p-Toluenesulfonyl-
hydrazide with Various Carbohydrates
Hanessian et al. have elegantly circumvented the use
of protecting groups in glycosyl 1-phosphate syn-
thesis by exploiting methoxypyridine (MOP) glycosyl
donors.11 Although the phosphorylation step in this
methodology is protecting-group-free, synthesis of each
MOP donor from free sugar requires a multistep pro-
tocol that involves protecting groups. We herein report
the first example of a two-step, protecting-group-free
protocol for the synthesis of glycosyl 1-phosphates from
hemiacetals.
We have previously reported the use of N0-glycosylto-
luenesulfonohydrazides (GSHs) as glycosyl donors for the
protecting-group-free synthesis of O-glycosides and glyco-
syl azides of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc).12 These
GSH donors are easily prepared under mild conditions in
one step from free sugars and can be activated using a
source of electrophilic halogen such as N-bromosuccinimide
(NBS). Due to the robustness of O-glycosylation using
these donors, we speculated that they could be used to
synthesize glycosyl 1-phosphates, if anhydrous phosphoric
acid was used as the acceptor.
a Isolated yields.
A range of GSH donors were easily accessed via acid-
catalyzed condensation of free hemiacetals with p-tolue-
nesulfonyl hydrazide (Table 1). This protocol does not
require chromatographic purification; the donors were
isolated by precipitation in high purity and excellent yield.
Additionally, only β-anomers of GSH donors were formed
under these conditions, further simplifying isolation and
chacterization. The exclusive formation of the β-manno-
sylsulfonohydrazide (4) was confirmed by NOE experi-
ments which showed similar enhancements between H1,
H3, and H5.
Initial investigation into the phosphorylation of
GSH donor 1 employed the conditions that were successful
for O-glycosidations: NBS in DMF and anhydrous phos-
phoric acid as the acceptor.12 No conversion of donor 1 to
the corresponding glycosyl phosphate 7 was observed
under these conditions (Table 2). We hypothesized that
the poor nucleophilicity of triprotic phosphoric acid was
preventing formation of the glycosyl 1-phosphate. At-
tempts to improve the nucleophilicity of the phosphate
using less acidic conditions failed to improve the reaction
conversion (Table 2).
Next, Lewis acidic metal ion oxidants, which may
coordinate the phosphoric acid and activate the GSH
donor, were explored. Several transition metal salts were
screened as oxidizing agents of GSHs, by qualitatively
monitoring the reaction for gas evolution (N2) (Table 2).
Of the metal salts screened only cupric chloride (CuCl2)
was an effective oxidant. This is consistent with previous
reports of Cu(II)-mediated oxidation of anomeric
hydrazines.13
(8) (a) Plante, O. J.; Palmacci, E. R.; Andrade, R. B.; Seeberger, P. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9545–9554. (b) Schmidt, R. R.; Wegmann,
B.; Jung, K. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1991, 121–124. (c) Schmidt, R. R.;
Stumpp, M.; Michel, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 405–408. (d) Veeneman,
G. H.; Broxterman, H. J. G.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6175–6178. (e) MacDonald, D. L. J. Org. Chem.
ꢀ
1962, 27, 1107–1109. (f) Ravida, A.; Liu, X.; Kovacs, L.; Seeberger, P. H.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1815–1818. (g) Cori, C. F.; Colowick, S. P.; Cori,
G. T. J. Biol. Chem. 1937, 465–477. (h) Gokhale, U. B.; Hindsgaul, O.;
Palcic, M. M. Can. J. Chem. 1990, 68, 1063–1071. (i) Pale, P.; Whitesides,
G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4547–4549. (j) Garcia, B. A.; Gin, D. Y.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2135–2138.
(9) (a) Nunez, H. A.; O’Connor, J. V.; Rosevear, P. R.; Barker, R.
Can. J. Chem. 1981, 59, 2086–2095. (b) Westerduin, P.; Veeneman,
G. H.; Marugg, J. E.; van der Marel, G. A.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 1211–1214.
(10) (a) Roseman, S.; Distler, J. J.; Moffatt, J. G.; Khorana, H. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 659–663. (b) Baisch, G.; Oehrlein, R. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 1997, 5, 383–391.
(11) Hanessian, S.; Lu, P.; Ishida, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
13296–13300.
Although the desired glycosyl phosphate 7 was formed
in the presence of CuCl2, the conversion was low and a
substantial amount of the hydrolysis product (GlcNAc)
was observed. Since all glycosylations were performed
(12) Gudmundsdottir, A. V.; Nitz, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3461–
3463.
(13) Hann, R. M.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 957–
958.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX