Aggregates of Azobenzene Phospholipids
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 39, 1997 9145
Melting points were taken on an El-Temp II melting point apparatus
and are uncorrected. The pH values were measured with an Orien
Research digital ionalyzer/501 pH meter. Proton NMR spectra were
recorded on a General Electric QE300 MHz spectrometer using
deuterated solvent locks or on a 500 MHz Varian VXR-500S
spectrometer. FAB mass spectra were measured at the Midwest Center
for Mass Spectrometry. Absorption spectra were obtained on a Hewlett-
Packard 8452A diode array spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra
were recorded on a SPEX Fluorolog-2 spectrofluorometer and were
not corrected. The circular dichroism (CD) study was carried out on
a JASCO J-710 spectropolarimeter. Differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) measurements were carried out on a Mc-2 Ultrasensitive
Scanning Calorimeter from MicroCal, Inc. Size extrusion experiments
for vesicles were performed with an extruder through CoStar Nucle-
opore Polycarbonate Filters. Dynamic light-scattering measurements
were carried out at the Eastman Kodak Research Laboratories.25 All
samples were routinely filtered through a 1.2 µm nylon syringe filter
before data acquisition. Cryo-transmission electron microscope mea-
surements (Cryo-TEM) were made either at the Eastman Kodak
Research Laboratories26 or at the laboratory of NSF Center for
Interfacial Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Uni-
versity of Minnesota.26 A 200 W Mercury lamp (Oriel) was used for
irradiation. The 365 nm line was separated through an interference
filter (365 BP 10, T ) 217). An Oriel tungsten lamp (Model 6130)
was used to produce intense visible light.
into monolayer films at the air-water interface. Although it
was initially thought that these aggregates were formed as a
consequence of self-organization of the functionalized am-
phiphiles into a relatively ordered structure, more extensive
investigations have shown that the aggregates are stabilized by
strong noncovalent aromatic-aromatic interactions and tend to
form readily in the presence of water, even before major
amphiphile organization has occurred.21 For several aromatics
and dyes the key species in forming these aggregates is a “unit
aggregate” which is in many cases a trimer or tetramer, which
has been proposed to be a chiral “pinwheel” structure based
both on simulations and experimental evidence.1,17,21 Our
studies suggest that the extended aggregates in several as-
semblies are probably best described as a mosaic or lattice of
the small “unit” aggregates. Aggregation has been found
especially prominent when the functionalized amphiphiles are
incorporated into phospholipid bilayers, either as “guests”
solubilized within the bilayer generated by a “host” phospholipid
or when modified phospholipids containing the chromophore
are themselves dispersed in aqueous media. Since saturated
phospholipids and structurally related amphiphiles form small
unilamellar closed spherical vesicles upon dispersion and probe
sonication in aqueous solution which can entrap reagents, a
number of investigations22-24 have sought to prepare vesicles
containing a photoreactive component which can be used to
promote a controlled release of entrapped reagents in various
applications including drug delivery.
In the present paper we report a study of the assemblies
formed from several synthetic azobenzene derivatized phos-
pholipids (APL’s) in aqueous media, their structures, physical
properties, and photochemical behavior. Results of the study
of these compounds provide some insights into the importance
of aggregation in controlling both the microstructure as well as
the macroscopic properties of the assemblies. Some of the key
findings include the observation that the trans-APL’s do not
form closed spherical bilayer vesicles upon dispersion in water
but rather form a variety of different structures, including large
plates or sheets in some cases, presumably due to resistance to
cuvature in the extended bilayer. We find that closed vesicles
capable of entrapping reagents can be formed when mixtures
of trans-APL’s are codispersed with saturated and unsaturated
phospholipids and that, depending upon the state of the
incorporated azobenzene as well as the host, controlled release
of entrapped reagents may be promoted by photolysis.
The general methods used for preparing Langmuir-Blodgett films
and self-assemblies are based on techniques described by Kuhn et al.27
Monolayers of chromophore-derivatized fatty acids or phospholipids
were prepared by spreading a chloroform solution of material to be
studied onto an aqueous surface containing cadmium chloride (2.5 ×
10-4 M) and sodium bicarbonate (3 × 10-5 M, pH ) 6.6-6.8) on a
KSV 5000 automatic film balance at room temperature (23 °C). The
monolayers were then transferred onto quartz substrates. Reflectance
spectra for monolayers at the air-water interface were recorded with
a SD1000 fiber optics spectrometer (Ocean Optics, Inc.) equipped with
optical fibers, an LS-1 minature tungsten halogen lamp and a CCD
detector.
Bilayer vesicles were prepared according to established protocols.28
A Cell Disrupter W220F from Heat Systems Ultrasonics, Inc. (setting
6.5, 35 W) was used for probe sonication. The vesicles trapping CF
were prepared as following:29 Depending on the specific vesicle systems,
an appropriate amount of DPPC or POPC, and/or APL stock solution
and/or cholesterol was dissolved in a small amount of CHCl3. The
CHCl3 was removed by a nitrogen stream to form a thin film on the
wall of vial, which was then dried under vacuum overnight. An
appropriate amount (usually 1-3 mL) of 0.1 M CF aqueous solution
(pH ) 7.0) was added to the vial and the sample was incubated in a
water bath at 65 °C for 20 min. The mixture was vortexed for 20 min
followed by a 10-15 min sonication until a clear, transparent solution
was obtained. To remove nonentrapped CF, the resulted vesicles were
purified via gel filtration on a Sephedex G-50 column, using Milli-Q
water as the eluent. The vesicle fraction was collected and stored at 4
°C for DPPC vesicles and at room temperature for POPC vesicles.
Experimental Section
Materials and General Techniques. Synthetic reagents were
purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company and used as received unless
otherwise stated. Cholesterol (99%); R-, â-, and γ-cyclodextrins
(99+%); and Triton-X-100 were purchased from Aldrich. Rattlesnake
venom, L-R-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine as the cadmium chloride
complex, Sephedex-50G, L-R-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC,
99+%), D- and L-R-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC, 99%), and
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) were ob-
tained from Sigma. All solvents for spectroscopic studies were
spectroscopic grade from Fisher or Aldrich. Milli-Q water was obtained
by passing in-house distilled water through a Millipore -RO/UF water
purification system. Deuterated solvents were purchased from MSD
Isotopes or Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. 5(6)-Carboxyfluorescein
(CF) was obtained from Eastman Chemical.
The vesicles containing CF from gel filtration were diluted with water
to a specific concentration by monitoring the absorption spectra of the
samples. Release of CF was monitored by scanning spectrofluorometer
at 518 nm with excitation at 492 nm. The irradiation of the sample in
a quartz cuvette was made with a mercury lamp with a 365 nm filter.
Once the irradiation was complete, the sample was transferred quickly
(25) The authors thank Dr. Thomas Whitesides at the Eastman Kodak
Research Laboratories for light scattering measurements.
(26) The authors thank Dr. John Minter at the Eastman Kodak Research
Laboratories and Dr. Michael Bench in the Department of Chemical
Engineering, University of Minnesota, for the help with Cryo-TEM studies.
(27) Kuhn, H.; Mo¨bius, D.; Bu¨cher, H. In Physical Methods of Chemistry;
Weissberger, A., Rossiter, B. W., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1972; Vol. 1,
P577.
(28) (a) Hope, M. J.; Bally, M. B.; Webb, G.; Cullis, P. R. Biophys.
Acta 1985, 55, 812. (b) Saunders, L.; Perrin, J.; Gammock, D. B. J. Pharm.
Pharmacol. 1962, 14, 567.
(29) (a) Weinstein, J. N.; Yoshikami, S.; Henkart, P.; Blumenthal, R.;
Hagins, W. A. Science 1977, 195, 489. (b) Liu, Y.; Regen, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 708. (c) Nagawa, Y.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 1668.
(21) Chen, H.; Liang, K.; Song, X.; Samha, H.; Law, K. Y.; Perlstein,
J.; Whitten, D. G. In Micelles, Microemulsions and Monolayers: Science
and Technology; Shah, D., Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc: New York, 1995; in
press
(22) Pidgeon, C.; Hunt, C. A. Photochem. Photobiol. 1983, 37, 491.
(23) Morgan, C. G.; Thomas, E. W.; Sanhdu, S. S.; Yianni, Y. P.;
Mitchell, A. C. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1987, 504.
(24) Kano, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Shimomura, M.; Kunitake, T.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1981, 34, 323.