X.-J. Wang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 24 (2013) 743–746
745
3. Results and discussion
We initially conducted the reaction using 2-aminobenzophe-
none 1a and 2-bromonitrobenzenes 2a as substrate in the presence
of PdCl2(PPh3)2, Cs2CO3 at 120 8C in DMF under an argon
atmosphere. However, a complicated mixture was observed,
which contained the desired product 3a in only 50% yield
(Table 1, entry 1). Different catalysts, ligands and solvents were
then screened for the cross-coupling of 2-bromonitrobenzene and
2-aminodibenzophenone. Reactions conducted utilizing Pd2(dba)3,
Pd(OAc)2 and PdCl2 with ligand 1,10-bis(diphenylphosphino)fer-
rocene (dppf) gave 3a in low yields (Table 1, entries 2–4). The best
result was obtained using PdCl2(PPh3)2 as catalyst, and toluene as
solvent, which gave product 3a in 95% yield (Table 1, entry 5),
whereas the same reaction in 1,4-dioxane gave 3a in 84% yield, and
in N-methylpyrrolidone gave 77% yield (Table 1, entries 6 and 7,
respectively).
These results indicated the coupling reaction proceeded
smoothly and consistently within the planned reaction sequence.
After the optimized reaction conditions were established, subse-
quent hydrogenation generated the corresponding amine com-
pound which is difficult to isolate due to its unstable properties.
We have investigated the intramolecular condensation conditions
without purification of compound 4a. To our delight, 5a could be
obtained in 93% yield after 5 min at r.t. by adding catalytic amounts
of p-TSA to the filtrate, where 10% Pd/C had been removed (Table 2
entry 3).
[15] Compound 5a: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3Cl): d 7.710 (d, 2H, J = 5.4 Hz), 7.404 (m,
3H), 7.323 (m, 2H), 7.014 (m, 3H), 6.918 (m, 1H), 6.779 (m, 1H), 6.704 (m, 1H),
4.975 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 169.49, 154.45, 142.60, 141.32,
140.85, 132.19, 131.94, 129.93, 128.67, 127.96, 127.56, 126.81, 124.17, 122.42,
119.70. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for C19H14N2: 271.123, found: 271.1233. Mp
129–131 8C. IR (KBr): 3350, 1609, 1571, 1445, 1283, 960. Compound 5b: 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CD3Cl): d 7.69 (d, 1H, J = 6.6 Hz), 7.44 (m, 3H), 7.38 (td, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz,
J = 1.5 Hz), 7.01 (m, 2H), 6.93 (m, 2H), 6.77 (d, 1H, J = 4.5 Hz), 6.72 (dd, 1H,
J = 7.8 Hz, J = 2.7 Hz), 6.63 (m, 1H), 4.97 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d
170.58, 160.97, 158.58, 154.50, 142.05 (J = 9 Hz), 140.90, 138.64, 132.15
(J = 6 Hz), 130.26, 129.64, 128.01, 127.45, 122.60, 120.08 (J = 9 Hz), 119.69,
114.58 (J = 23 Hz), 112.88 (J = 23 Hz). HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for
With optimized reaction conditions established, we examined
the scope of the method for the assembly of 1,4-diazepine
derivatives. A variety of substitutions on the o-bromonitroaro-
matic ring was tolerated, including electron-withdrawing (Table 3,
entries 3, 6, and 10) and electron-donating groups (Table 3, entries
2 and 9), as well as with fluoro substitution on the aromatic ring
(Table 3, entries 1 and 8) and with 2-bromo-3-nitropyridine
(Table 3, entries 4 and 11). It is noteworthy that the chloro
substituent and the carboxylic ester group remained intact in the
reactions and gave products in high yields (Table 3, entries 5 and
6). The two step sequence to substituted 1,4-diazepines gave yields
ranging from 82% to 95%, which corresponds to a yield of 90% to
98% over each step of the sequence. Furthermore, the reaction
could be scaled up to gram amounts without any problem [15].
C
19H13FN2: 289.1136, found: 289.1142. Mp 103–105 8C. IR (KBr): 3352, 1613,
1466, 1216, 1107, 866. Compound 5c: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3Cl): d 7.70 (d, 2H,
J = 7.8 Hz), 7.43 (m, 3H), 7.37 (m, 1H), 6.99 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.89 (m, 2H), 6.74 (d,
1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.60 (s, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 170.00,
156.61, 155.03, 141.67, 141.29, 135.77, 132.15, 131.94, 129.97, 129.58, 127.94,
127.44, 122.28, 120.24, 119.51, 113.13, 112.55, 55.59. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd.
for C20H16N2O: 301.1335, found: 301.1339. Mp 149–152 8C. IR (KBr): 3349, 2400,
1666, 1501, 1328, 1243, 1117, 960. Compound 5d: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3Cl): d
7.70 (d, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 7.56 (s, 1H), 7.41 (m, 3H), 7.27 (m, 2H), 6.97 (m, 2H), 6.74
(t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.12 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 170.85, 153.40,
145.85, 140.77, 140.72, 132.38, 132.36, 130.41, 129.62, 128.07, 127.50, 126.01,
125.98, 123.51, 123.47, 122.93, 119.99, 119.85. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed an efficient and convenient
synthesis of 1,4-diazepine derivatives via Pd-catalyzed amination,
hydrogenation and intramolecular condensation sequences. The
conditions of the coupling and cyclization have been fully
investigated. The efficiency and substituent tolerance of these
procedures have been demonstrated by synthesizing a number of
functionalized 1,4-diazepine derivatives. Considering the short
steps and mild conditions for the synthesis, together with the
inexpensive starting material and catalytic system, this method
provides an expansion on the substrate scope of Buchward’s
strategy, as well as an alternative route for the synthesis of 1,4-
diazepine derivatives.
C
20H13F3N2: 339.1104, found: 339.1105. Mp 129–131 8C. IR (KBr): 3267, 2400,
1607, 1445, 1325, 1123, 1074, 960, 751. Compound 5e: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CD3Cl): 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 4.8 Hz), 7.68 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.56 (d, 1H,
d
J = 7.8 Hz), 7.38 (m, 3H), 7.29 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.01 (m, 2H), 6.92 (m, 1H),
6.83 (d, 1H, J = 5.1 Hz Hz), 6.19 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 171.06,
153.39, 152.01, 145.05, 140.80, 136.52, 135.24, 132.51, 132.30, 130.27, 129.64,
128.01, 127.13, 122.32, 120.40, 119.98. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for C18H13N3:
272.1182, found: 272.1187. Mp 183–186 8C. IR (KBr): 3277, 2380, 1703, 1454,
1227, 1021, 960. Compound 5f: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3Cl): d 7.67 (d, 2H,
J = 6.9 Hz), 7.42 (m, 3H), 7.30 (m, 2H), 6.95 (m, 3H), 6.76 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz),
6.61 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 170.78, 154.18, 119.84,
141.75, 141.40, 140.71, 132.30, 130.39, 129.67, 129.09, 128.13, 128.04, 127.34,
126.40, 122.71, 120.58. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for C19H14ClN2: 305.0840,
found: 305.0845. Mp 191–193 8C. IR (KBr): 3274, 2336, 1601, 1423, 1255, 1064,
960. Compound 5g: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3Cl): d 7.98 (s, 1H), 7,60 (m, 3H), 7.42–
7.52 (m, 3H), 7,35 (t, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz), 7.03 (m, 1H), 7.01 (m, 1H), 6.79 (d, 1H,
J = 7.6 Hz), 6.73 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 5.21 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d
166.552, 153.289, 147.334, 140.777, 132.660, 132.477, 132.344, 130.495,
130.320, 130.045, 129.641, 128.398, 128.036, 127.399, 126.095, 122.809,
Acknowledgment
This work was financially supported by National Natural
Science Foundation of China (No. 81102322).
120.019, 119.592, 51.968. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for
C21H17O2N2,
329.1284, found 329.1286. Mp 159–162 8C. IR (KBr): 3285, 1238, 1078, 1054,
975, 730. Compound 5h: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3Cl): d 7.60 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz), 7.29
(m, 2H), 7.19 (m, 2H), 7.02 (m, 3H), 6.91 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 6.77 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz),
6.69 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.97 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 169.36, 154.39,
142.62, 140.95, 140.12, 138.49, 132.18, 131.82, 129.54, 128.64, 127.59, 126.57,
124.10, 122.32, 119.67, 119.66, 21.38. HRMS (m/z) (M+H): Calcd. for C20H16N2:
References