Soteras et al.
Gas phase calculations were carried out using Gaussian03.28
MST calculations were performed using a locally modified
version of Gaussian-03.
provide useful guidelines to tune the selective preparation
of enantiopure derivatives, which is a crucial aspect in the
design of bioorganic and pharmaceutical compounds.
Experimental Procedures. The generation of the enolate of
2a was carried out at low temperature (-78 °C) for 1 h using
lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (1 M in THF, 1.5 equiv) as the
base, followed by addition of the alkylating reagent (2.5 equiv).
The reaction mixture was then stirred at -78 °C for 2 h and
quenched by addition of a saturated aqueous solution of sodium
chloride. Reactions were performed using THF as the solvent.
Additional experiments were carried out upon lactam 2a to
evaluate the effect that the solvent (THF, toluene), the cation of
the base (Li+, K+), and cosolvent (HMPA, 2 equiv) could have
on the diastereomeric endo:exo ratio.
Experimental Section
Computational Details. The computational protocol used here
follows the main trends adopted in our previous study about
the origin of the π-facial stereoselectivity in the methyl alkylation
of the enolates of oxazolopiperidones 1 and 2.10a On the basis
of previous studies,10a,20 which showed that single point MP2
energies at the B3LYP geometries provide a reasonable estimate
of the lithium enolate activation barrier, full geometry optimiza-
tions were performed with the B3LYP21 density functional
method using the 6-31+G(d) basis set, and single-point MP2/
6-31+G(d) and MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ calculations were subse-
quently performed to determine the relative energies of the endo
and exo transition states. Higher-order electron correlation effects
were estimated from CCSD/6-31G(d) calculations, and the best
estimate of the energy difference between transition states was
determined by combining the relative energies computed at the
MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level and the energy correction obtained from
CCSD and MP2 calculations performed with the 6-31G(d) basis
set [denoted in the following as MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ + (CCSD-
MP2)/6-31G(d)]. The nature of the stationary points was verified
by inspection of the vibrational frequencies, which were used
to calculate zero point, thermal and entropic corrections within
the framework of the harmonic oscillator-rigid rotor at 1 atm
and 298 K. These corrections were added to the electronic
energies to estimate the free energy differences in the gas phase.
[3R,6R(and 6S),8aR]-6-Benzyl-8a-methyl-5-oxo-3-phenyl-
2,3,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-5H-oxazolo[3,2-a]pyridine (3a and 3b)
and (3R,8aR)-6,6-Dibenzyl-8a-methyl-5-oxo-3-phenyl-2,3,6,7,8,8a-
hexahydro-5H-oxazolo[3,2-a]pyridine (3c). A solution of the
lactam 329 (200 mg, 0.87 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added to
a cooled (-78 °C) solution of LiHMDS (1 M in THF, 1.0 mL,
1.0 mmol) in THF (10 mL). After the solution stirred at -78
°C for 1 h, benzyl bromide (0.15 mL, 1.31 mmol) was added,
and stirring was continued for 2 h. The reaction was quenched
by the addition of saturated aqueous NaCl, and the resulting
mixture was extracted with EtOAc and CH2Cl2. The combined
organic extracts were dried and concentrated, and the resulting
residue was chromatographed (1:1 hexane-EtOAc) to afford a
mixture of epimers 3a and 3b [165 mg, 59%; (70:30 calculated
by GC/MS)], dialkylated product 3c (50 mg, 14%), and starting
lactam 3 (34 mg, 17%). 3a: IR (film) 1654 cm-1; 1H NMR (300
MHz) δ 1.34 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.56 (m, 1H, H-7), 1.72 (m, 1H,
H-7), 1.90-1.97 (m, 2H, H-8), 2.39 (m, 1H, H-6), 2.46 (dap, J
) 9.6 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 2.99 (dap, J ) 9.6 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph),
3.83 (dd, J ) 9.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H, H-2), 4.33 (dd, J ) 9.0, 7.0 Hz,
1H, H-2), 4.81 (dd, J ) 7.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H, H-3), 6.96-7.22 (m,
10H, ArH); 13C NMR (75.4 MHz) δ 21.7 (C-7), 23.8 (CH3),
32.5 (C-8), 37.1 (CH2Ph), 40.7 (C-6), 58.8 (C-3), 71.5 (C-2),
93.1 (C-8a), 126.0 (CH), 126.3 (2CH), 127.3 (CH), 128.2 (2CH),
128.4 (2CH), 129.1 (2CH), 139.7 (C i), 141.7 (C i), 169.4 (NCO);
[R]22D +43 (c 0.9, MeOH); MS-EI m/z 321 (M+, 43), 306 (100),
187 (12), 162 (39), 120 (92), 91 (89); HMRS calcd for
C21H23NO2 (M+ + 1) 322.1801, found 322.1804. 3b: IR (film)
The relative stabilities in solution were estimated by com-
bining the free energy difference in the gas phase and the
differences in solvation free energy determined from MST
calculations.22 QM SCRF continuum calculations were per-
formed by using the B3LYP/6-31G(d) optimized version of the
MST(IEF) model,23 which relies on the integral equation
formalism (IEF)24 of the polarizable continuum model.25 The
MST model determines the solvation free energy by three terms,
which account for electrostatic, cavitation, and van der Waals
contributions associated with the transfer of the solute from the
gas phase to solution. Since the MST model has not been
parametrized to treat solvation in tetrahydrofuran (i.e., the solvent
used in experimental assays; see below),26 calculations were
performed for the solvation in water, octanol, chloroform and
carbon tetrachloride in order to explore the effect of varying
the polarity of the solvent.23,27
1
1647 cm-1; H NMR (300 MHz) δ 1.12 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.57 (m,
1H, H-7), 1.77-1.91 (m, 2H, H-7, H-8), 2.09 (dt, J ) 13.0, 4.0
Hz, 1H, H-8), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-6), 2.79 (dd, J ) 13.5, 8.0 Hz,
1H, CH2Ph), 3.07 (dd, J ) 13.5, 4.0 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 3.86 (dd,
J ) 9.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H, H-2), 4.37 (dd, J ) 9.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H, H-2),
4.85 (dd, J ) 7.5, 2.0 Hz, 1H, H-3), 7.09-7.26 (m, 10H,
ArH);13C NMR (75.4 MHz) δ 23.1 (CH3), 23.3 (C-7), 34.3 (C-
8), 37.3 (CH2Ph), 42.8 (C-6), 59.2 (C-3), 71.4 (C-2), 93.1 (C-
8a), 126.2 (3CH), 127.3 (CH), 128.2 (2CH), 128.5 (2CH), 129.4
(20) Pratt, L. M.; Van Nguyen, N.; Ramachandran, B. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 4279.
(21) (a) Becke, A. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Becke, A. B. Phys.
ReV. A 1998, 38, 3098. (c) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988,
37, 785.
(22) Since the MST model was parametrized from experimental free energies
of solvation at 298 K, the gas phase free energy difference was also determined
at this temperature for the sake of internal consistency.
(23) (a) Bachs, M.; Luque, F. J.; Orozco, M. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15,
446. (b) Curutchet, C.; Orozco, M.; Luque, F. J. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22,
1180. (c) Soteras, I.; Curutchet, C.; Bidon-Chanal, A.; Orozco, M.; Luque, F. J.
J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2005, 727, 29.
(24) (a) Cance`s, E.; Mennucci, B. J. Math. Chem. 1998, 23, 309. (b) Cance`s,
E.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032. (c) Mennucci, B.;
Cance`s, E.; Tomasi, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10506.
(25) (a) Miertus, S.; Scrocco, E.; Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 55, 117. (b)
Miertus, S.; Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 65, 239.
(26) The dielectric permittivity is 7.5 at 295 K. Data taken from Handbook
of Chemistry and Physics, 80th ed.; Lide, D. R., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, 1999.
(27) (a) Orozco, M.; Bachs, M.; Luque, F. J. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16,
563. (c) Luque, F. J.; Zhang, Y.; Aleman, C.; Bachs, M.; Gao, J.; Orozco, M. J.
Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 4269. (d) Luque, F. J.; Alema´n, C.; Bachs, M.; Orozco,
M. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 806.
(2CH), 139.3 (C i), 141.8 (C i), 168.6 (NCO); [R]22 -129 (c
D
0.58, MeOH); MS-EI m/z 321 (M+, 34), 306 (100), 187 (12),
162 (30), 120 (82), 91 (84); HMRS calcd for C21H23NO2 (M+
1
+ 1) 322.1801, found 322.1797. 3c: IR (film) 1642 cm-1; H
NMR (300 MHz) δ 0.63 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.77-1.92 (m, 4H, H-7,
H-8), 2.23 (d, J ) 12.5 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 2.67 (d, J ) 13.5 Hz,
1H, CH2Ph), 2.94 (d, J ) 13.5 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 3.42 (d, J )
12.5 Hz, 1H, CH2Ph), 3.92 (dd, J ) 9.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H, H-2), 4.35
(dd, J ) 9.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H, H-2), 4.83 (dd, J ) 7.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H,
H-3), 6.99-7.02 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.16-7.41 (m, 12H, ArH); 13C
NMR (75.4 MHz) δ 22.0 (CH3), 23.7 (C-7), 31.9 (C-8), 42.8
(CH2Ph), 44.9 (CH2Ph), 47.8 (C-6), 59.1 (C-3), 71.4 (C-2), 93.1
(C-8a), 126.3 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 126.9 (2CH), 127.3 (CH), 128.0
(4CH), 128.3 (2CH), 131.0 (2CH), 131.0 (2CH), 137.0 (C i),
(28) Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 03, ReVision B.04; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh
PA, 2003.
(29) Munchhorf, M. J.; Meyers, A. I. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7084.
7762 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 19, 2008