published for the natural compound relied on an X-ray
diffraction analysis2 and was thus unambiguous, the reported
NMR data2a were actually those of the epimer at C-1. These
inconsistencies were resolved in later publications as a
consequence of accurate NMR studies9 and stereoselective
syntheses.7
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Australine 1
The published synthetic strategies for pyrrolizidine deriva-
tives vary widely.10 Considering only the total synthesis of
australine, five different approaches have been reported.
Denmark’s synthesis was based on an asymmetric tandem
[4 + 2]/[3 + 2] cycloaddition methodology,7b whereas
Pearson’s synthesis started from a sugar precursor7c and
Wong and Romero made use of a chemoenzymatic strategy.7d
In all three cases, one C-N bond was created first and the
other two in a subsequent, one-pot process. In contrast with
these methodologies, White’s and Madsen’s syntheses of
australine relied upon the ruthenium-catalyzed ring-closing
metathesis (RCM).7e,f This reaction was used to generate
hexahydroazocine epoxides, which underwent transannular
cyclizations to the desired pyrrolizidine system. RCM played
also an important role in Pyne’s attempted synthesis,11 in
which it was employed to create one of the two five-
membered rings. The strategy, however, proved suitable for
the preparation of 1-epiaustraline but failed in the case of
australine itself.
stereoselectively to (S)-R-alkoxyaldehydes to yield adducts
of general structure A (Scheme 2).12 The retrosynthetic
Scheme 2. Aldol Reaction of Ketones III with
R-Alkoxyaldehydes
Our own retrosynthetic concept is depicted in Scheme 1.
As compared with the aforementioned syntheses, a distinctive
feature is the simultaneous disconnection of all C-N bonds
by means of three consecutive SN2 reactions with a nitrogen
nucleophile in a single precursor. This unveils the polyhy-
droxylated chain of I (OX ) leaving group), in which the
stereogenic centers of C-2 and C-7a carbons show a
configuration opposite to the corresponding carbons in
australine. Intermediate I could be derived from ketone II
which in turn can be disconnected, via retroaldol cleavage
of the C1-C7a bond, to ketone III and chiral aldehyde IV.
This represents a very convergent strategy in which the eight
carbon atoms of the target molecule are joined from two
four-carbon precursors.
scheme proposed for australine relied upon this finding. Thus,
after a careful choice of appropriate protecting groups, III
and IV (Scheme 1) became 3 (III, P2 ) TES) and 4 (IV, P3
) Bn, P5 ) TPS), respectively (Scheme 3).
The aldol addition of ketone 313 to aldehyde 414 was
accomplished under the described conditions.12 After oxida-
tive workup, the polyoxygenated ketone 5 was obtained as
a single stereoisomer in 72% yield (Scheme 3). In order to
achieve a stereoselective reduction of the ketone carbonyl
(12) Marco, J. A.; Carda, M.; D´ıaz-Oltra, S.; Murga, J.; Falomir, E.;
Ro¨per, H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8577-8582.
We have recently demonstrated that Z boron enolates
derived from L-erythrulose derivatives such as III add
(13) For the preparation of variously protected D- and L-erythrulose
derivatives using chiral precursors other than erythrulose itself, see: Marco,
J. A.; Carda, M.; Gonza´lez, F.; Rodr´ıguez, S.; Murga, J. Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1996, 1801-1810. For an improved preparation of silylated L-erythrulose
acetonides III (P2 ) TES, TBS, TPS) from L-erythrulose hydrate, see: Carda,
M.; Rodr´ıguez, S.; Murga, J.; Falomir, E.; Marco, J. A.; Ro¨per, H. Synth.
Commun. 1999, 29, 2601-2610.
(7) Previous syntheses of australine: (a) Furneaux, R. H.; Gainsford, G.
J.; Mason, J. M., Tyler, P. C. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2131-2160. (b)
Denmark, S. E.; Martinborough, E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3046-
3056. (c) Pearson, W. H.; Hines, J. V. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5785-
5793. (d) Romero, A.; Wong, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8264-8268.(e)
White, J. D.; Hrnciar, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9129-9142. (f) Lauritsen,
A.; Madsen, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2898-2905.
(8) For recent reviews on syntheses of this compound class, see: (a)
Yoda, H. Curr. Org. Chem. 2002, 6, 223-243. (b) Ayad, T.; Genisson, Y.;
Baltas, M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 1211-1233.
(9) (a) Wormald, M. R.; Nash, R. J.; Hrnciar, P.; White, J. D.; Molyneux,
R. J.; Fleet, G. W. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 2549-2558. (b)
Kato, A.; Kano, E.; Adachi, I.; Molyneux, R. J.; Watson, A. A.; Nash, R.
J.; Fleet, G. W. J.; Wormald, M. R.; Kizu, H.; Ikeda, K.; Asano, N.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 325-331.
(10) (a) Hanzawa, Y.; Ito, H.; Taguchi, T. Synlett 1995, 299-305. (b)
Oppolzer, W. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1995, 125, 207-213. (c) Broggini, G.;
Zecchi, G. Synthesis 1999, 905-917. (d) Pandit, U. K.; Overkleeft, H. S.;
Borer, B. C.; Biera¨ugel, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 959-968. (e) Bowman,
W. R.; Fletcher, A. J.; Potts, G. B. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I 2002,
2747-2762. (f) Pyne, S. G.; Davis, A. S.; Gates, N. J.; Hartley, J. P.;
Lindsay, K. B.; Machan, T.; Tang, M. Synlett 2004, 2670-2680.
(11) Tang, M.; Pyne, S. G. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 5759-5767.
(14) Aldehyde 4 was prepared through modification of a previously
published method for the synthesis of a closely related product (TES instead
of Bn: Hayashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, J.; Shoji, M. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9839-
9846). See details of the preparation in the Supporting Information.
(15) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. ProtectiVe Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1999; pp 45-48.
(16) The SEM group was selected for its ability to allow control of the
carbonyl reduction of 6 by means of a chelation mechanism. When other
protecting groups with the same property, such as MOM or a MEM, were
assayed, cyclic methylenedioxy derivatives (formaldehyde acetals) were
formed in the reduction process with LiBH4. Precedents of such side
reactions are known: (a) Herbert, J. M.; Knight, J. G.; Sexton, B.
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 15257-15266. (b) Kiyooka, S.; Shahid, K. A.; Goto,
F.; Okazaki, M.; Shuto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7967-7978. (c)
Ramachandran, P. V.; Prabhudas, B.; Chandra, J. S.; Reddy, M. V. R. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6294-6304. In some cases, however, formation of
formaldehyde acetals may be the desired reaction: Durham, T. B.;
Blanchard, N.; Savall, B. M.; Powell, N. A.; Roush, W. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 9307-9317.
78
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 1, 2007